Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

2019 Headliners


rzwodezwo

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Mr.Tease said:

Just console yourself by imagining how much more control we'll have over being able to do much less! 

I'm more concerned about my status and whether I will have any assurances to stay in the country. :( 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, H.M.V said:

I'm more concerned about my status and whether I will have any assurances to stay in the country. :( 

Similar issues here. Wife has just been given dual UK / Dutch nationality / passport. & Woffling. Was fuckin hard work as she (wife) was born in SAfrica. Apparently if we move there - which we can - I can have one...if I can speak decent Dutch. Visiting her relatives 2-4 times a year is gonna be hard work (for me) though. My mother in law (Dutch, no UK passport, lived / worked here 20+ years) is...concerned. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Woffy said:

Similar issues here. Wife has just been given dual UK / Dutch nationality / passport. & Woffling. Was fuckin hard work as she (wife) was born in SAfrica. Apparently if we move there - which we can - I can have one...if I can speak decent Dutch. Visiting her relatives 2-4 times a year is gonna be hard work (for me) though. My mother in law (Dutch, no UK passport, lived / worked here 20+ years) is...concerned. 

It's a real shit show. Nobody can make any plans and lives are essentially on hold till some clarity is given. I know we've been told that if we're in the country we can stay but the amount of flip flopping and lies means sleepless nights. Anyway, sorry for derailing with the misery of you know what. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, H.M.V said:

I'm more concerned about my status and whether I will have any assurances to stay in the country. :( 

I'm pretty sure you will regardless, although she lies she has said a few times that they'll guarantee the rights of all EU citizens even in the event of a no deal Brexit. The system they'll set up to do that will be a disaster though. I've got a few friends in the same boat as you, horrible not knowing for sure. 

Edited by Mr.Tease
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, billum said:

Talking to a bass player in a high profile band recently he said that basically Brexit will make European tours unfeasible for UK artists (unless arrangements are made that keep everything like they are now). With all the gear having to be checked at every border after we leave it just wouldn't be worth their while doing a tour of Europe

That would be similar for bands coming over here, although I guess they'd only need to be checked at the one border coming into the UK, but the extra hassle and admin could put some of the smaller EU bands off

Let's keep our fingers crossed for Christine and the Queens for 2019 then!

It’ll only be an issue if we end up with a no-deal Brexit, which is a possibility obviously, but I don’t think it’ll happen. But even if it did, I don’t see why UK acts couldn’t tour the EU like any other third country act. They’d be checked at the border when they arrive, but they’d then have free movement within the Schengen area. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, H.M.V said:

It's a real shit show. Nobody can make any plans and lives are essentially on hold till some clarity is given. I know we've been told that if we're in the country we can stay but the amount of flip flopping and lies means sleepless nights. Anyway, sorry for derailing with the misery of you know what. 

im not going to let it happen ... no other reason than you share/ shared  the same surname I believe :) not relevant I know :) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, crazyfool1 said:

im not going to let it happen ... no other reason than you share/ shared  the same surname I believe :) not relevant I know :) 

Aw bless ya. I'm sure I personally will hopefully be ok but it affects so many people with uncertainty. (curious to your surname now :D ) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, Matt - Ed Banger Records said:

Have heard from a source that The Cure are headlining the Other Stage and they have a female headliner on the pyramid. 

Pleaseeeeeee be true...I just can't see The Cure headlining anything other than Pyramid after playing main stages at every other fest in 2019.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, henry bear said:

They’re doing Southside the same day as the Foos, so won’t be main headliners there.

That does seem like an unusual arrangement. I wonder if they are seen as joint headliners or perhaps, The Cure are headlining one day and the Foos the other. I wonder if both bands will do 2 hour slots with a weak undercard. The Cure's logo has been shoved up the top as if they are headliners on the poster...

Either way, I'll be astounded if they do the Other Stage at Glastonbury.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No idea as to whether the female is playing opposite The Cure, also heard that Stormzy is practically playing for free, have no reason to think the info is incorrect as it’s someone in the biz, but also unsure how/why they would have the info this early in the year. 

Edited by Matt - Ed Banger Records
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...