Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

2019 Headliners


rzwodezwo

Recommended Posts

  • Admin
1 hour ago, Hugh Jass said:

Macca is playing Wednesday night (Thursday morning our time) in the States, so even if he leaves straight after he'll be touching down here Thursday night/Friday morning. You'd think they'd grant him as much time as possible to recover and get himself fit to play. 

yeah, Macca on Sunday would seem to make the most sense against that.

Which would put The Cure on Saturday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, eFestivals said:

yeah, Macca on Sunday would seem to make the most sense against that.

Which would put The Cure on Saturday.

Make AM less likely, given it would be a Friday slot for the 3rd time based on that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CaledonianGonzo said:

If you judge it by 2013 Michael and Emily don't seem to like the locals all that much.

If you judge it by 14 as well they seem to be in outright warfare with the locals.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Doug85 said:

True but they were slightly big in 2013 (not that they warranted to headline IMO). Plus they probably thought that they had given them more than enough with Beyonce' at the last one 

"Sorry Mr Mumford, we were going to book you for this year, but we don't think you're big enough to appease the locals, so we'll pull another bigger band out of our arse instead.... Sorry, what's that Michael?... OK Marcus,my dad's just pointed out that they did get Beyonce 2 years ago so they'll understand having to settle for you. See you in June".

2 minutes ago, mufcok said:

Make AM less likely, given it would be a Friday slot for the 3rd time based on that?

"We'd like to book you this year, lads, we really would. But the only thing that stands in the way is that it'd be the third time you've played a Friday and we really can't have that. I'm sure you'll understand".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, mufcok said:

Make AM less likely, given it would be a Friday slot for the 3rd time based on that?

I don't think that makes much of a difference really. They won't turn down AM because they can only fit them on Friday and they've already headlined the Friday twice before. 

I don't think the days, generally speaking, make much of a difference at all. I don't think you're likely to see a young up and comer given the Sunday headline slot (if that's not the case, surely they would have just moved Flo to Sunday and not asked the Who to cancel the Paris date a few yars back?), but other than that I think anyone can slot anywhere really.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, GETOFFAMYLAWN said:

"Sorry Mr Mumford, we were going to book you for this year, but we don't think you're big enough to appease the locals, so we'll pull another bigger band out of our arse instead.... Sorry, what's that Michael?... OK Marcus,my dad's just pointed out that they did get Beyonce 2 years ago so they'll understand having to settle for you. See you in June".

If I remember it right a few people on here suggested that Milverton & Sons were specially chosen for the locals as they sit on haystacks playing banjos and the residents of Somerset are presumably all farmers / bumpkins.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, dentalplan said:

 

Why doesn’t his time on a top-of-the-range private jet constitute rest? Does he fly the plane himself, singing Hey Jude all the way?

"Does he fly the plane himself"

No

" singing Hey Jude all the way?"

Yes

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin
5 minutes ago, The All Round Ball :| said:

Does anyone think we will get an act announcement this month like how Radiohead got announced 2 weeks after ticket sales for Glasto 2017? 

can only be guessed at.

Early announcements are normally driven by what the particular band wants to do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, eFestivals said:

what recent bruce rumours?

Just a few rags reporting that "a source close to the festival’s organisers has said that Bruce Springsteen will be one of the three headliners". Also, Paddy Power slashed their odds

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Bovla said:

Just a few rags reporting that "a source close to the festival’s organisers has said that Bruce Springsteen will be one of the three headliners". Also, Paddy Power slashed their odds

Didn’t ‘Little’ Steven call the rumours ‘bullshit’ recently?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...