Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Liam Gallagher


plaskins

Recommended Posts

9 hours ago, squirrelarmy said:

The right thing to do. Leave bubblegum pop for the masses and watch Liam G and hope the other ex Oasis members on site also join in.

You're nuttier than squirrel turd if you think Oasis are getting back together at 5pm on the other stage 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, swede said:

http://www.nme.com/news/music/liam-gallagher-wall-of-glass-interview-2082053 

Hell of a tune, couldn't care less if he's drafted in song writers if the songs are that quality. 

Can't say I agree. Seems like he is still stuck in the 90's. So simple and boring, song sounds like a tune you would always skip on a mediocre Oasis album.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Anarion said:

Can't say I agree. Seems like he is still stuck in the 90's. So simple and boring, song sounds like a tune you would always skip on a mediocre Oasis album.

There's certainly some interesting stuff going on in the music at times that I picked up on that you wouldn't hear on oasis tracks, I had it turned up mighty loud though so I could give it a really good listen 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, jonodillieono said:

The fuck is this thread?

'Beady eye where too good musically'

Whatever youre smoking I want some

I'm referring to their musicianship. They had crap material but they played it very well from a technical perspective and that same talent sucked most of the soul from latter day Oasis shows. Early Oasis with Bonehead and Guigs playing rudimentary power chords and root bass notes was much better.

Edited by Monkismo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Heads up for anyone looking on eBay for London LG tix. I bid on a pair earlier but they were taken down an hour before auction ends. Then I got message off the guy saying eBay mysteriously took them down, and did i still want them. Could be legit, might not be. He also said he couldn't get name changed and there would be no problem getting in. I'm swerving that! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Bonaneas said:

Heads up for anyone looking on eBay for London LG tix. I bid on a pair earlier but they were taken down an hour before auction ends. Then I got message off the guy saying eBay mysteriously took them down, and did i still want them. Could be legit, might not be. He also said he couldn't get name changed and there would be no problem getting in. I'm swerving that! 

You can't sell tickets on Ebay, that's why. All listings get removed. Ebay own Stubhub (and made this move in about 2012??)

I wouldn't touch them without Paypal protection. That name change stuff... yeah jog on!

Edited by briddj
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Bonaneas said:

Heads up for anyone looking on eBay for London LG tix. I bid on a pair earlier but they were taken down an hour before auction ends. Then I got message off the guy saying eBay mysteriously took them down, and did i still want them. Could be legit, might not be. He also said he couldn't get name changed and there would be no problem getting in. I'm swerving that! 

Couldn't say whether that guy is legit or not, but eBay have been stopping people selling gig tickets on there for years now. They do take down ticket listings, they've got StubHub to rip people off instead.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Bonaneas said:

I thought that too, that it all migrated to stubhub. All the other auctions on eBay  I've watched last day or so went through to the end though. Bizarre. 

Another reason to steer clear! 

It think it depends when they are spotted - some on Buy It Now will still get through etc. Some might get away with a one day listing perhaps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, addicted2noise said:

Yeah it starts good but there's no real chorus. His vocals sound good though, be interesting to see how it does. 

I could not agree more with you mate.

As I said last night though, his solo stuff only has to be half decent with the promise of Oasis tunes being played as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think its pretty good mind. As long as that's not the best song, and there is better to come anyway. Nobody is expecting Definitely Maybe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, addicted2noise said:

Yeah it starts good but there's no real chorus. His vocals sound good though, be interesting to see how it does. 

Spot on; he has such a great voice and I get the feeling he needs his brother back on board to make it truly soar again with a killer chorus or bridge

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Padgey said:

No giveaway from him on Radio X this morning, we got the standard "if they ask me I'd like to"!

Wasn't a no though was it either - he's clearly playing, as you'd think he'd know he's supposed to be a festival exlusive. If he'd have said no, then we could have been thrown right off kilter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, briddj said:

Wasn't a no though was it either - he's clearly playing, as you'd think he'd know he's supposed to be a festival exlusive. If he'd have said no, then we could have been thrown right off kilter.

Defo, I got the impression it was a yes but he just couldn't say yet.

I'm not sure if he's sold all the tickets for his gigs but I think it may get officially announced after he's done them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really like it, more than I expected to

Interested to hear to the rest, the slower ones sounded very good live

He's one funny fucker. Funny on Radio X this morning 

Edited by mufcok
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...