Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

So are Fleetwood Mac lying about Glasto?


Justiceforcedave

Fleetwood Mac for Glasto? Yay or nay?  

241 members have voted

  1. 1. Are Fleetwood Mac Playing Glasto?



Recommended Posts

I think it would be short sighted for any band to just look at the fee alone when it comes to Glastonbury, and I would assume Fleetwood Mac's management wouldn't be that short sighted.

Yes purely looking at the cash side of it, the fee Glastonbury would pay vs the cash they would get from their own Tour would be miniscule in comparison, but however big you are as a band everybody knows that Headlining Glastonbury elevates you to a new level in terms of awareness.

The amount of younger people that would see them at the Festival or on the BBC for the first time, the amount of people that would have forgotten about them and have a new found love for them, the amount of free publicity they would get from the newspapers around the build up and during the festival would all lead to huge indirect benefit to their pockets from headlining it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it would be short sighted for any band to just look at the fee alone when it comes to Glastonbury, and I would assume Fleetwood Mac's management wouldn't be that short sighted.

Yes purely looking at the cash side of it, the fee Glastonbury would pay vs the cash they would get from their own Tour would be miniscule in comparison, but however big you are as a band everybody knows that Headlining Glastonbury elevates you to a new level in terms of awareness.

The amount of younger people that would see them at the Festival or on the BBC for the first time, the amount of people that would have forgotten about them and have a new found love for them, the amount of free publicity they would get from the newspapers around the build up and during the festival would all lead to huge indirect benefit to their pockets from headlining it.

very true, im sure their management have done the sums...it may be that the exposure actually makes little differenece to their profits? who knows..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

very true, im sure their management have done the sums...it may be that the exposure actually makes little differenece to their profits? who knows..

I wondered that,a newish band would have a lot to gain from the exposure but a band that has been around for fifty years and the fact that you can pick up their albums in charity shops.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it would be short sighted for any band to just look at the fee alone when it comes to Glastonbury, and I would assume Fleetwood Mac's management wouldn't be that short sighted.

Yes purely looking at the cash side of it, the fee Glastonbury would pay vs the cash they would get from their own Tour would be miniscule in comparison, but however big you are as a band everybody knows that Headlining Glastonbury elevates you to a new level in terms of awareness.

The amount of younger people that would see them at the Festival or on the BBC for the first time, the amount of people that would have forgotten about them and have a new found love for them, the amount of free publicity they would get from the newspapers around the build up and during the festival would all lead to huge indirect benefit to their pockets from headlining it.

Assuming money/ exposure are the sole drivers for accepting the booking. They are in their 50's/60's. They will be in the middle a long tour. With their money - couldn't they just be thinking "can't be arsed - we'll be shagged after the O2."

That's where the already booked Friday night comes in - they might be plain old knackered.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

management often don't get a cut of catalogue sales, so while it might be good for the band it might not be for the management - and so the management would be likely to try and divert a band away from Glasto towards big fees for other shows, to maximise their own income (and it would difficult to criticise a manger for getting the maximum guaranteed money).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Assuming money/ exposure are the sole drivers for accepting the booking. They are in their 50's/60's. They will be in the middle a long tour. With their money - couldn't they just be thinking "can't be arsed - we'll be shagged after the O2."

That's where the already booked Friday night comes in - they might be plain old knackered.

well they could be thinking that.

or they could be thinking "after we play the O2 on Friday, we've nothing to do until Leeds on Tuesday, why not make 750k by playing Glastonbury on Saturday/Sunday".

if they were that knackered they wouldn't be touring across the States for months on end and doing 2 nights back-to-back for a lot of it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The biggest benefit they would get out of playing glastonbury would (with the increased exposure) surely be a rise in tickets sales after the event (as album sales would surely struggle to raise the sort of cash they get on tour). If, as some headliners have done, they announced or were due to play multiple dates after glastonbury it would help but they're doing enough uk dates to suggest they won't be back for a while (if at all at their age).

I think i'm going to switch from a yay to nay prediction (hope i'm wrong)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Changed my vote to a nay after the 26th date was announced

Really can't see this happening now, weren't they lined up for the friday?

Neil heard they were lined up for the Friday last year, and so had guessed they'd probably be Friday this year if they were to play. I think that's correct, and I think that's all there was to the Friday thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Tonight was a disgrace. There wasn't *that* much rain, and it wasn’t *that* windy. A festival of this size should be able to withstand some adverse weather without it bringing the whole circus to a standstill. And if it is true that part of a speaker on the Revolut stage fell…   As for the communication - announcing Massive Attack were playing at 12:30 and then nothing for over an hour while people waited in the rain. It’s laughable it really is.   If I said I’ll never come back again I’d be lying. The shambles of Barcelona 2022 and the disgrace of Madrid 2023 didn’t stop me, so this probably won’t either.   This festival gets so much wrong, but it is always saved by having such killer line-ups. It’s just a shame it treats the fans/customers/consumers like animals. Compare it to somewhere like Glastonbury and it’s worlds apart.
    • Yeah, I admit that a small part of me felt relieved when they announced that MA are canceled.. But on the positive side- got to see Florence Road afterall, and they were great
    • Glad I could take the €3 bus to Playa Catalunya! Hope y'all warm and dry up.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...