Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎


Acid_Haze

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 37.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • FloorFiller

    1190

  • Rose-Colored Boy

    1060

  • Matt42

    1040

  • eFestivals

    1008

they had bloody Chase & Status up against the Stones - it's clearly not that big of an issue to them

Wouldn't surprise me if that was a Jagger "put us on the same time as someone shit. Just enough to completely fill the Pyramid Field" type demand.

Much like Roger Waters "we're not going on before the Spice Girls, nudge them off the bill" demand at Live 8.

Edited by The Nal
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If it were, it would suggest a major name on the Pyramid with Flo being a device to split the crowds/manage the volumes (or it might not, but that was my initial thought)

I said this yesterday but it's a myth you need two massive acts to balance out crowds.

2013 proved that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I said this yesterday but it's a myth you need two massive acts to balance out crowds.

2013 proved that.

Between Chase and Status and Public Enemy it was enough.

Like Dolly and Sam Smith?

People were going to Dolly regardless. Out of pure morbid curiosity. Imagine missing that sax solo?!

Edited by The Nal
Link to comment
Share on other sites

GFL office this morning - 'We anticipate they'll be nothing revealed in the next 24 hours'. Mate emailed them.

That's good enough for me. They're holding out until after midnight tonight, and I think it's because they want to measure the Kanye effect. After that, I don't see anything stopping them. If it's P****e, releasing a line-up with TBC might actually demonstrate to him that they're not using his name to sell the event like he stupidly thinks they did last year.

I'm saying 7pm tomorrow night.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So - if Prince bails, they do a switcheroo and punt Machinery onto Pyramid and promote some sort of Jake Bugg-a-like into the topsot on the Other Stage....(?)

Yeah that was what I was thinking too... Just out of interest as well (hypothetically of course) After the Prince issue last year, and then maybe he bails out this year... how would Prince fans feel about that? would that be it do we reckon, no more chances? or third times a charm?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So - if Prince bails, they do a switcheroo and punt Machinery onto Pyramid and promote some sort of Jake Bugg-a-like into the topsot on the Other Stage....(?)

I'm not even sure the Eavii know what to do yet, but we're still on here waiting for the line-up that'll surely not be out for a good few weeks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

that would be a pretty odd turn of events - she may not be as huge as she was when she left off, but that's a pretty sizeable step down. subbing somebody like Prince, though not headlining, isn't something you can complain about. headlining the second stage is admitting 'well my chances of ever headlining are gone'

if Flo headlined the other on Saturday, that would please many who don't want to see kanye, I reckon.

But as I said, I've no idea if it's true.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In all fairness it wouldn't have mattered one iota who they put up against The Stones. The crowd would have still been mega.

Exactly, and the pyramid field can hold 100,000+ punters. Glasto rarely pulls dangerous crowds either, it may be a bit tight but it's rare you're gonna be subject to pushing and shoving.

There was a bit during Arctic monkeys in 2013 but that was because I was surrounded by genuine dickheads.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

someone has told me today that Flo is headlining the other stage.

I've no idea if it's true, tho.

Feels very deja vu to last year this.

Metallica on the other stage, big headliner falls through, band bumped to pyramid headliner.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's good enough for me. They're holding out until after midnight tonight, and I think it's because they want to measure the Kanye effect. After that, I don't see anything stopping them. If it's P****e, releasing a line-up with TBC might actually demonstrate to him that they're not using his name to sell the event like he stupidly thinks they did last year.

I'm saying 7pm tomorrow night.

Decent shout mate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Probably alt-J or Ben Howard or something. Although I doubt Flo is actually booked for the Other Stage.

If the guy who's claiming to know is right the other headliners this year are Rudimental, The Chemical Brothers and Alt -J

If he is right of course

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the guy who's claiming to know is right the other headliners this year are Rudimental, The Chemical Brothers and Alt -J

If he is right of course

I'm pretty sure the guy only claimed that he'd found out that Rudimental were headlining Friday night. Anything else is separate.

Not that I'm giving any thought to Florence playing the Other Stage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Feels very deja vu to last year this.
Metallica on the other stage, big headliner falls through, band bumped to pyramid headliner.

Was thinking this too.

That 'nothing expected in the next 24 hours' e-mail above is so annoying, why couldn't they have said 72 hours or even 48, meant I could have got some work done over the next couple of days :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...