Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎


Acid_Haze

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 37.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • FloorFiller

    1190

  • Rose-Colored Boy

    1060

  • Matt42

    1040

  • eFestivals

    1008

I will find it very funny, especially for all the Stone Roses fans, when they announce Kylie as the Sunday headliner.

BTW, no info that this is happening. Just 10 years after she was meant to do it, in the UK doing a big gig the week before (or is it after?) and there was mention about getting more female acts - as much evidence as for any other rumour on this thread!

There's nothing funny about Kylie headlining Glastonbury

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Indeed but £170 or whatever, even though i am on a pretty decent salary, is no drop in the ocean

If i pay tomorrow, then line up is released and its crap, and there is no Prince, then that would be 4 days just getting pissed, with very little music

you knew the deal when you signed up, like everybody else.

your view of the festival, as expressed in your second paragraph, is so endearingly naive that i can't help but smile.

go, Bon. you can afford it. if it's not for you, then at least you'll have found out. though i offer you a wager of a pint that should you attend, we'll be seeing you here again next year.

and it'll be you trying to convince the newbies that, honestly, the line up is only a part of it.

but you probably know all this.

all the best,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd love to hear Elephant Stone live, they did it at Finsbury Park but not Heaton Park. It'd be bittersweet if they played it while I was having religious-like experiences watching Patti Smith on WH.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

More cos turns into stone wasn't down to them. The Roses never wanted that released. Same as the complete.....

true, though at least on Turns the tunes are left untouched. Complete is a fucking abomination of 're-engineered' 7 inch version awfulness that should never have been heard never mind released.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fully agree.

Nobody loved their debut more than me but it amazes me how a band can hold onto such 'legendary' status. It's been 20 years since they released an average album and nothing since.

The roses are a nostalgia act, a reason for people to reminisce whilst dusting off the old flares and bucket hats.

Fair play to them for being savvy enough to keep the hype going whilst doing zero I suppose.

Great music is great music, doesn't matter when you heard it or when they recorded it, don't be so tied down to time fella.

Some of the best music happened a feck of a long time ago, Robert Johnson, Beatles, Bob Marley, Stones, Who, Hendrix, Clash, Stone Roses, Nirvana etc etc etc , some happened 5 minutes ago, PABH, Royal Blood, Drenge, Temples etc etc ...... Just get it, love it ...... deal with it.

F T L.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Someone on Twitter bumped into Reni in Manchester the other night, and when asked if the Roses were playing he said that the line up was being posted all over Twitter and Facebook:

http://2raw4fm.com/thezone/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/GOTJ-13.jpg

King Krimson?

I hope they pop up playing In the Kourt of the Krimzon Klown in full somewhere.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agree with all of this. And even though I wish I didn't I love turns and play it on vinyl shit loads. If they wanted me to follow their principles they should have released shit b sides.

As an aside, I dunno why but I was shocked when I found out you liked the roses.

ha! as a general rule of thumb, indie isn't my bag. but i'm from East Lancs, just up the M66 from Mancunia so i guess that had some effect.. and i'm just about old enough to remember Madchester.

though when it comes down to it, i'd take the Mondays over the Roses any day of the week. and i really like the Roses!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Someone on Twitter bumped into Reni in Manchester the other night, and when asked if the Roses were playing he said that the line up was being posted all over Twitter and Facebook:

http://2raw4fm.com/thezone/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/GOTJ-13.jpg

An infinite number of monkeys bumped into an infinite number of Renis ........ and tehy invented a load of bullshit

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...