Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎


Acid_Haze

Recommended Posts

what is that statement based on exactly?

The fact that Neil refrains that Glastonbury doesn't offer as much for their headliners as (lets say) reading and leeds would?

I can't see any of that trio being pissed at the fee, therefore Glastonbury wouldn't have to shell out a greater portion of money for one act, meaning that they have more money to spend on acts that aren't headliners.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 37.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • FloorFiller

    1190

  • Rose-Colored Boy

    1060

  • Matt42

    1040

  • eFestivals

    1008

i'm assuming Coldplay and Flo's love of the festival. don';t see why Grohl would take a lower fee

Yeh why would flo take a lower fee? Coldplay only made that offer due to having extreme wealth thanks to being the Biggest Band In The World.

Flo is nothing like in their position (although admittedly her massively posh and wealthy family probably have a higher net worth than coldplay)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The fact that Neil refrains that Glastonbury doesn't offer as much for their headliners as (lets say) reading and leeds would?

I can't see any of that trio being pissed at the fee, therefore Glastonbury wouldn't have to shell out a greater portion of money for one act, meaning that they have more money to spend on acts that aren't headliners.

Make anote of the day and time - I agree with this other Matt!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The fact that Neil refrains that Glastonbury doesn't offer as much for their headliners as (lets say) reading and leeds would?

I can't see any of that trio being pissed at the fee, therefore Glastonbury wouldn't have to shell out a greater portion of money for one act, meaning that they have more money to spend on acts that aren't headliners.

so you mean they will be offered the same amount of money as any other headliners ever are (the stones excepted), meaning the undercard will in fact be exactly the same as any other year.

I see.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeh why would flo take a lower fee?

I can imagine flo being more of an act that's desperate to say she's headlining glastonbury.

I don't think she's big enough, or has enough autonomy to only chase the big paycheques... I can't see her ever turning down the offer to headline glastonbury... ever.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

so you mean they will be offered the same amount of money as any other headliners ever are (the stones excepted), meaning the undercard will in fact be exactly the same as any other year.

I see.

It's conjecture but I doubt the stones are the only headliner that glastonbury has shelled out for, too many acts have headlined glastonbury that would probably want a bit more than the standard fee.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No one else raised an eyebrow at the NME caning their article about why she should headline? Worthy HQ buttering people up.

I'd like to think Worthy HQ would be rather embarrassed if they asked the NME to put that out there!

It's only a matter of time before the likes of george michael are yearned for.

They did that last year didn't they? When Neil had Wham as a rumour!

It's conjecture but I doubt the stones are the only headliner that glastonbury has shelled out for, too many acts have headlined glastonbury that would probably want a bit more than the standard fee.

Except the only real fact we have around what the Stones were payed is that Michael said they got the same fee as every other headliner gets at Glastonbury?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It doesn't offer as much. So it would be the same whoever headlines. That's the point.

Coldplay once reportedly did it for free. Thats an exception

well no, it wouldn't, because it's not a standard headliner fee.

fees will be negotiated and bands will have their own standard fee, and that will budge based on a variety of factors.

in some cases Glastonbury will be able to match that relatively easily, or in other cases may have to work to a compromise.

as such there are probably plenty of headline level acts who were approached/had talks but subsequently didn't play.

if it was just "here's the headliner fee", then booking headliners would be a piece of piss.

Edited by ghostdancer1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Basement Jaxx 120 Billy Bragg 90 Chase & Status 150 MAX CMAT 150 MAX  Confidence Man 150 MAX David Byrne 150 MAX Everything Everything 130  Faithless 105 Fatboy Slim 100 Four Tet 120 Garbage 125  GOAT 10 (-5) Greentea Peng 125  Joy Crookes 110  Kneecap 120 Lorde 150 MAX The Maccabees 135  Nile Rodgers & Chic 150 MAX The Prodigy 150 MAX Pulp 150 MAX RAYE 65 Richard Ashcroft 110  Scissor Sisters 110  Self Esteem 150 MAX  The Streets 100  Super Furry Animals 95 (+5) Underworld 150 MAX Wolf Alice 150 MAX
    • My wife works for a music company, they have an allocation already.  They run a ballot for it early next year. 
    • This is my guess too.    2028 festival breaks the £400 barrier. 
    • Yeah I did spot that AXS had more available for the O2 shows Muse are doing, though I think that comes with the territory of AXS now being the venue's primary ticket selling platform.    My instinct remains they'll probably still play to a big crowd on the night - sales were similarly slow in 2023 but videos of those gigs showed the venue looking pretty much full. Equally it probably would be sold out if the pricing was even just slightly less ridiculous. Shave up to £50 off some of these categories and I think that would've got people to go with it. 
    • Some are definitely already there with that and with another round of inflation looking like it's on the way, it certainly locks that in. And I say that as someone who also isn't willing to break the £100 marker. 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...