Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

2025 Headliners


Guest

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, NorthernSoul52 said:

Robbie Williams one of those who could headline right now, but after the fallow year, likely falls into pure legends territory.

 

Not sure why, just feels like that.

I think he'd have gone down better had he been booked a few years ago.

 

Though he'd still draw a crowd tbf.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, fraybentos1 said:

I think Robbie would draw one of the biggest ever crowds if he did the Legends slot. Would be as big as Kylie 

Yeah I think he's basically perfect right now to get as a legend act. If Celine and Cher were a no go then he would absolutely fit the bill. Robbie, SS, Charli Xcx or C&S, Stevie.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, charlierc said:

I think he'd have gone down better had he been booked a few years ago.

 

Though he'd still draw a crowd tbf.

 

I'd actually say the exact opposite to that tbh.

 

While he was much more of a ticket shifter in the 00s than he is now, capable of selling out multiple nights at Knebworth back when it still had a huge capacity, the Glastonbury crowd of the time was much more of your NME reading "anyone that isn't Radiohead is sh*t" type affair. I think a much higher percentage of people (compared to now) would have turned their noses up at the big pop superstar and gone to something they perceived as "credible" instead.

 

Then in the 2010s both aspects lessened slightly - the Glastonbury crowd gradually became less pretentious, but RW wasn't shifting as many tickets so overall the "draw" of him at the festival broadly stayed the same.

 

I think it's only recently, where he's now seen as a more sympathetic figure and something of a self-aware national treasure, where the two could realistically meet. Even 10 years ago if they'd booked him there'd have been a lot of "That arrogant prick? No chance, I'm going to see the Chemical Brothers for the sixth time instead".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can't stand Robbie Williams in terms of his persona and his music - i'd happily avoid him headlining or legending, whatever is the plan. Take That or solo, all dreadful for me. Just no. 

 

HOWEVER i am absolutely fascinated by the idea of his biopic being filmed with a CGI monkey as the starring role - who's idea was that? Why have people agreed to it? Why hasnt someone stopped it? Is it actually genius and a comment on how pop singers under management are performing monkeys, or was it as simple as someone going 'why not make him a monkey, LOL'? its the most interesting bit of his career by a bloody mile, as far as im concerned. Might even watch it ffs! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, balti-pie said:

Can't stand Robbie Williams in terms of his persona and his music - i'd happily avoid him headlining or legending, whatever is the plan. Take That or solo, all dreadful for me. Just no. 

 

HOWEVER i am absolutely fascinated by the idea of his biopic being filmed with a CGI monkey as the starring role - who's idea was that? Why have people agreed to it? Why hasnt someone stopped it? Is it actually genius and a comment on how pop singers under management are performing monkeys, or was it as simple as someone going 'why not make him a monkey, LOL'? its the most interesting bit of his career by a bloody mile, as far as im concerned. Might even watch it ffs! 

The movie industry is embracing weird sh*t. Pharrell Williams' biopic that come out today that has his life depicted in Lego has a really odd feel to it as a concept.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, incident said:

 

I'd actually say the exact opposite to that tbh.

 

While he was much more of a ticket shifter in the 00s than he is now, capable of selling out multiple nights at Knebworth back when it still had a huge capacity, the Glastonbury crowd of the time was much more of your NME reading "anyone that isn't Radiohead is sh*t" type affair. I think a much higher percentage of people (compared to now) would have turned their noses up at the big pop superstar and gone to something they perceived as "credible" instead.

 

Then in the 2010s both aspects lessened slightly - the Glastonbury crowd gradually became less pretentious, but RW wasn't shifting as many tickets so overall the "draw" of him at the festival broadly stayed the same.

 

I think it's only recently, where he's now seen as a more sympathetic figure and something of a self-aware national treasure, where the two could realistically meet. Even 10 years ago if they'd booked him there'd have been a lot of "That arrogant prick? No chance, I'm going to see the Chemical Brothers for the sixth time instead".

Tbf I wasn't going so far back as to when Robbie was at his peak so much as a couple of years back.

 

Still, he headlined Isle of Wight last year and was positively received. And as noted, Glastonbury has moved on from a more indie-focused feel so is more amiable to pop headliners. We're certainly a long way from Jay-Z headlining Glastonbury being treated as like it was some grand offence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, charlierc said:

The movie industry is embracing weird sh*t. Pharrell Williams' biopic that come out today that has his life depicted in Lego has a really odd feel to it as a concept.

 

I'm in favour of this kind of nonsense. More of this kind of nonsense! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, nikkic said:

Robbie f**king Williams is not headlining Glastonbury. 
 

Jesus wept. 

 

Thank you!  I was reading these posts, scratching my head, thinking I'd missed a chapter!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, nikkic said:

Robbie f**king Williams is not headlining Glastonbury. 
 

Jesus wept. 

 

 

This time last year, people 100% would've said the same thing about SZA (or S f**king ZA, if you like 😄) Sometimes weird stuff comes from out of the blue. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Ben7amin_ said:

While I do not think he would headline -  

 

Robbie Williams would get an absolute massive sized crowd and simultaneously generate a mega amount of moaning.  

 

So just easier on everyone to give the man the Legend Slot like he wants cos he knows he's better suited for it 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Supernintendo Chalmers said:

Williams would get a bigger crowd in the Sunday teatime slot than he would as headliner 

 

I mean.. Yeah?

 

Struggling to think of any act that you couldn't say that for.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...