Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Sale Date Change


CaledonianGonzo

Recommended Posts

Why is it whenever Glastonbury try to do anything technical, its a massive screw up

  • Last year payments not going through and people getting tickets 30 minutes after sold out tweeted 
  • Year before that when everyone had access to the special Glastonbury COVID live event which people paid for
  • This year is not realising till 4hours before tickets that there maybe be an issue with registrations 

 

Honestly - pretty miffed and I can still get tickets on the 16th and the 19th (horrifically hungover and my friends trying from their hotels)

There are people out there who literally moved schedules and used holidays who have been screwed as they now cant get tickets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, 09matthewsw said:

Ridiculous that’s there people on here who still make out that the festival is 10x / 20x oversubscribed when they’ve been able to get tickets year after year after year. The festival demand is a lot lower than people believe and it’s not outside the realm of possibility that the festival were slightly concerned it might not sale out immediately. 

well out of the last 8 sales / resales I have been able to secure a ticket in one of them. This is with a group of 6 people trying. It will 100% sell out, this has nothing to do with any worries about it not selling out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, stuie said:

people who have a confirmation email for their reg update now can’t access them using the lookup. See have f**ked up, nothing to do with influencers. 

This was Glastonbury's last tweet before today - from Monday this week. 

I confirmed my reg, and got a confirmation email for that.  But I also knew they were going to delete a load of registrations in early October, so anybody could/should have checked that they still had a registration on the other side of that.

People suddenly finding they have no registration, have had a month to have checked this, and ignored multiple reminders to do exactly that!

image.png.ee8071a7396420c36b3ce2fc9c7208e1.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, goonerben said:

This was Glastonbury's last tweet before today - from Monday this week. 

I confirmed my reg, and got a confirmation email for that.  But I also knew they were going to delete a load of registrations in early October, so anybody could/should have checked that they still had a registration on the other side of that.

People suddenly finding they have no registration, have had a month to have checked this, and ignored multiple reminders to do exactly that!

image.png.ee8071a7396420c36b3ce2fc9c7208e1.png

So it is the thickos fault?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

People saying this is because they’re scared it won’t sell out are out of their minds. Glastonbury is more popular than ever with last year selling out just as fast as it has the previous decade. I’m sure it’s got a lot more to do with some technical issue, most likely regarding this whole registration check business, than them worrying they’re gonna have tickets left over which obviously won’t be the case. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, goonerben said:

People suddenly finding they have no registration, have had a month to have checked this, and ignored multiple reminders to do exactly that!

Lots of stories of people who didn’t ignore it, and jumped through all the hoops, only to find they didn’t have a valid registration. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, BBC7BBCHEAVEN said:

Why do you care? No offence but you just try in two weeks instead. It's a minor inconvenience at most

Because people have made plans and they may not be available on the new date. Our group has the date in the diary from the moment it's announced. As it is we all have other plans for that weekend. If you're going to delay it, give more than two weeks notice. Why not have the sale in January?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, The Nal said:

So it is the thickos fault?

I'm not calling anybody a thicko.  But everybody has had a month to check they still have a registration.  Not having done so until this week, displays an enormous amount of faith in See Tickets not to f**k up, which is (evidently) misplaced!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, glimmers_of_hope said:

I don't think it's got anything to do with being worried about selling enough tickets.  It will always be oversubscribed now unless there is a massive change, like it not being televised on BBC or not having massive headliners. Even then I think it would continue to sell out on reputation alone. 

It looks like some genuine issues with registration for some people. 

Massively frustrating for those of us who haven't had issues and got sorted for today/ Sunday especially as it feels like we will be worse off (I.e. more people trying for tickets).

However, in the spirit of the festival I think it is the right thing to do. 

Glasto would get slated whatever they did in this scenario at least they are trying to let people access tickets who wouldn't be able to. 

They deserve to be slated though as they created this situation themselves 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, kalifire said:

Lots of stories of people who didn’t ignore it, and jumped through all the hoops, only to find they didn’t have a valid registration. 

They may not have ignored the need to confirm registration by 30th September.  But have certainly ignored messages saying to check your registration during October.  Plenty did that, found they didn't have one, and re-registered.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, goonerben said:

I'm not calling anybody a thicko.  But everybody has had a month to check they still have a registration.  Not having done so until this week, displays an enormous amount of faith in See Tickets not to f**k up, which is (evidently) misplaced!

You’re not accounting for technical failure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, rwhitehouse13 said:

Like others it messes me up as I will be in a meeting for the coach sale and away for the general sale. Meh.

I'd booked this weekend off work for the sale, am due in on the rescheduled date.  Honestly I'll take the minor irritation if it stops others losing out unfairly due to an administrative cock-up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Absolutely fuming. Most of our group have organised work, holiday and family schedules around being available this weekend. I'm sure almost everybody else has too.  And its now for nothing because a relatively small handful of people cant get themselves organised in good time. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Has everyone commented on their post? I hope thousands do. Im sick of all this fairness excuse for everything? Its blooming unfair for my nurse friends who booked the time off and havent got a hope in hell of getting it off now. Same for all shift workers . Its grossly unfair. Ive had to take my blood pressure tablets early Im so annoyed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, aj6658 said:

Because everything was sorted for today - groups sorted, plan of action all ready for today.  Now people might want to change groups because more people have got their act together. 

Also Im celebrating my birthday on the 18th - now all gonna be hungover for the 9am sale

 

Why do you have more of an issue with me than Glastonbury deciding to postpone 4 hours before because people who were lazy are given a chance 

 

That's my issue too, all of my group are staying at my house on the 18th to celebrate my birthday, so rather than being spread around the country with access to different routers, we're all going to be on one. I don't fancy our chances.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Ayrshire Chris said:

I’d love to know how many registrations are affected by this and how many folk are actually properly registered for tickets. Actual number always seems to be shrouded in secrecy. 

I thought about this too. My solution would have been to put about 80% of tickets on sale for those with active registrations now, put the final 20% on sale in Jan after a new registration period.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • In August 2009, in his Spectator blog he wrote about Harriet Harman, deputy leader of the Labour Party, in unflattering terms. Liddle began the article by asking: "So — Harriet Harman, then. Would you? I mean after a few beers obviously, not while you were sober."[27] Tanya Gold wrote in The Guardian that Liddle had delivered a "tissue-thin polemic." Pointing out that it was The Spectator's cover story that week.[28] Rachel Cooke in The Observer nearly two months later recalled finding Liddle's piece "disgusting"[29] Cooke went on to say: "I would still like to do something really unpleasant to the man who wrote [the article]." Liddle said two months later that the Harman column "was supposed to be a parody of guttural, base sexism", a joke he assumed readers would understand. After the negative response from Gold (and then Cooke, among other female journalists) he continued: "And then I suppose I came to the conclusion – gradually – that I must have got it wrong."[30] In June 2014, he said that of those he had offended, Harman was the one person to whom he would apologise.[31] In November 2009, again for The Spectator website, he offered "a quick update on what the Muslim savages are up to," a brief article about the stoning to death of a 20-year-old woman in Somalia after she was accused of adultery, and the similar death of a 13-year-old the year before. He made remarks, considered sarcastic, that read: "Incidentally, many Somalis have come to Britain as immigrants recently, where they are widely admired for their strong work ethic, respect for the law and keen, piercing, intelligence."[32][33] In December 2009, on his Spectator blog, Liddle referred to two black music producers, Brandon Jolie and Kingsley Ogundele, who had plotted to kill Jolie's 15-year-old pregnant girlfriend, as "human filth" and said the incident was not an anomaly. He continued: When he was accused of racism, Liddle said he was instead engaging in a debate about multiculturalism.[35][36] In March 2010 the Press Complaints Commission (PCC) upheld a complaint against Liddle, who became the first journalist to be censured over the contents of a blog, because he had not been able to prove his claim about the crime statistics.[37] After the publication of London crime figures in June 2010, The Sunday Telegraph suggested Liddle was largely right on some of his claims, but that he was probably wrong on his claims about knife crimes and violent sex crimes.[38] In October 2010, Liddle called for the abolition of the Welsh language TV channel S4C as a result of the 2010 Comprehensive Spending Review. In his article for The Spectator, he described Welsh nationalists as "miserable, seaweed munching, sheep-bothering pinch-faced hill-tribes".[39] On 23 May 2013, Liddle wrote about the murder of soldier Lee Rigby near the Royal Artillery Barracks in Woolwich, London. In the original version of a blog article for The Spectator, he referred to the perpetrators as "two black savages".[40] After many objections to his language use,[41] this phrase was modified.[42] Liddle apologised.[40][43] Giving a speech at Durham University in December 2021, Liddle said: "It is fairly easily proven that colonialism is not remotely the major cause of Africa's problems, just as it is very easy to prove that the educational underachievement of British people of Caribbean descent or African Americans is nothing to do with institutional or structural racism."[44] Independent editor rumour and Millwall supporters' website The Guardian reported on 8 January 2010 that the expected purchase of The Independent by Alexander Lebedev, a Russian billionaire, would be followed by the appointment of Liddle as editor.[45] Roy Greenslade wrote on 11 January that the reports were provoking a "major internal and external revolt" by The Independent's staff and readers.[46] The stories about Liddle's posts on Millwall Online apparently further reduced the likelihood of his being offered the job.[47] Finally, on 19 February, Stephen Brook of The Guardian reported that Liddle was no longer in the running for the post.[48] Tim Luckhurst, professor of journalism at the University of Kent, argued that Liddle's prospects of editing The Independent were nullified "by the people behind a viciously intolerant campaign of liberal bigotry".[49] In January 2010, the press drew attention to allegedly racist and misogynist comments posted under the username "monkeymfc"—a name Liddle has used—on Millwall Online, a fan club web forum with no official connection to Millwall Football Club. Liddle attributed some of the comments to opposition fans logging in under his name to embarrass him. He later said he had written some of the posts that were being criticised, including one in support of the BNP excluding Black and Asian people from the party.[50] Another post, in which he joked about not being able to smoke at Auschwitz,[51] led to his being asked to explain what he meant in The Jewish Chronicle.[47] While he said in June 2014 that his comments were taken out of context, he said that he did not regret making them. "No. Never. Absolutely not. I thought about my mates at Millwall Online, God I respect them so much more than these other people, these ghastly f**king people."[31] Stephen Lawrence, disabled and transgender people In November 2011, an article by Liddle for The Spectator suggested the trial of two men accused (and later convicted) of murdering Stephen Lawrence would not be fair.[52] It was referred to the Attorney General Dominic Grieve by the judge for possible contempt of court,[53] and he ordered the jurors not to read it. Having decided that it might have breached a court order, Grieve passed the case on to the Crown Prosecution Service and the Director of Public Prosecutions.[54] The decision that The Spectator was to be prosecuted by the CPS for breaching reporting restrictions was announced on 9 May 2012, with a court hearing scheduled for 7 June, although Liddle as the author was not himself liable for prosecution. Fraser Nelson, the magazine's editor, announced that the prosecution would not be contested,[55] and the magazine pleaded guilty at the hearing. The fine was £3,000, plus £2,000 compensation to Stephen Lawrence's parents and £625 costs.[56] In January 2012, Liddle wrote that many people in the UK were "pretending to be disabled" in his column for The Sun,[57] an opinion defended by James Delingpole.[58] Frances Ryan in The Guardian accused him of "belittling something that on a daily basis affects real people" who can be "a huge benefit to society. Maybe for a month Liddle would like to try that."[59] In May 2015, the Independent Press Standards Organisation (IPSO) upheld a complaint from Trans Media Watch that Liddle had been discriminatory towards Emily Brothers, a blind and transgender Labour candidate at the 2015 general election, in two Sun columns published in December 2014 and January 2015. In commenting in the way he had Liddle had breached two sections of the editors' code.[60][61] Column on poppers and gay sex During a parliamentary debate on the Psychoactive Substances Bill – which "makes it an offence to produce, supply, offer to supply, possess with intent to supply, possess on custodial premises, import or export psychoactive substances"[65] the Conservative politician Crispin Blunt admitted he used poppers: Liddle responded in his Spectator blog: The satirical and current affairs magazine Private Eye described this as hypocritical, pointing out Liddle's account in The Sunday Times of using Viagra in July 2004.[68][69] A spokesperson from the LGBT rights charity Stonewall said of Liddle's remarks: "Comments like this are shocking and damaging, but we wouldn't expect anything less from repeat offending bigots like Rod Liddle."[70] Column on Muslim voters In October 2019, Liddle penned a column in The Spectator commenting on the forthcoming December 2019 UK general election, which suggested that the election should be held on a Muslim holy day to reduce the Labour vote. The column was criticised by senior political figures including Chancellor of the Exchequer Sajid Javid and former Conservative Deputy Prime Minister David Lidington. Liddle defended the content as being humorous. The article also criticised the Labour MP Rosie Duffield's recent speech about her experience of trying to exit an abusive relationship; Duffield described the article as "racist and misogynistic".[74]
    • A true social democrat
    • I thought the same thing I thought when Baresi went which is there sure is a hell of alot of people who don't make the new pension age.
    • 1, The Menzingers- Everything I Ever Saw 2, Quicksand- Bring On The Psychics 3, Radkey- Bedroom Sand  
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...