Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Headliners 2023


Crazyfool01

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, FloorFiller said:

Yeah I agree. I think the fact that he’s toured non stop for two years straight might’ve taken the shine off a little in a lot of peoples eyes, but him doing his last ever U.K. show at Glastonbury is massive and I can’t think of a better way to close off Glastonbury ‘23 than his set of wall to wall hits. Gonna be a proper euphoric tearjerker, and Christ do I hope I get to be there.

When the time comes more than happy to help. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, FloorFiller said:

Yeah I agree. I think the fact that he’s toured non stop for two years straight might’ve taken the shine off a little in a lot of peoples eyes, but him doing his last ever U.K. show at Glastonbury is massive and I can’t think of a better way to close off Glastonbury ‘23 than his set of wall to wall hits. Gonna be a proper euphoric tearjerker, and Christ do I hope I get to be there.

Happy to pitch in on T-Day to help 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, FloorFiller said:

Yeah I agree. I think the fact that he’s toured non stop for two years straight might’ve taken the shine off a little in a lot of peoples eyes, but him doing his last ever U.K. show at Glastonbury is massive and I can’t think of a better way to close off Glastonbury ‘23 than his set of wall to wall hits. Gonna be a proper euphoric tearjerker, and Christ do I hope I get to be there.

Absolutely with you... i need to be there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CaledonianGonzo said:

The Stereophonics, Kasabian and Moby have all been booked to headline the G without the sky coming crashing down. This year's choices are what they are, but they're not indicative of any sort of wider malaise or downward spiral.

Should have booked Kings of Leon again 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Hugh Jass II said:

Haven’t watched the Disney thing so can’t comment.

I am seeing him at the O2 in April so will report back.

Cheers! Will be good to hear your review.

I'm not too fussed either way really as will be seeing him as a bit of a novelty act. I think, as others have said, the crowd will carry a performance like that.

Edited by Zoo Music Girl
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Hugh Jass II said:

I expect them in a billed slot, but if they’re not on the lineup then I reckon that’s where they’ll be.

I agree with this. Will be amazed if they're not billed, though.

I have tickets for Finsbury week after but would love to see them at the farm too. And I have mates going to G who aren't going to Finsbury so keeping everything crossed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The 1975 accepting a billed non headline slot is them tacitly admitting that their moment has been and gone. Foals and Biffy have faced up to it, but who knows whether her that guy in the The 1975 will.

 

Edit: Crossed wires. Didn't realise people were discussing Pulp.

Edited by CaledonianGonzo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Zoo Music Girl said:

I agree with this. Will be amazed if they're not billed, though.

I have tickets for Finsbury week after but would love to see them at the farm too. And I have mates going to G who aren't going to Finsbury so keeping everything crossed.

Yeah I’m going to Finsbury too, easily the gig I’m most looking forward to in 2023.

Taking the kids to GF this year which means I have to be a lot more realistic in terms of how much I’m actually going to see. Won’t be cramming into the JP secret sets or anything like that. Which is why I’m not taking any chances on acts I’d want to see at Glastonbury who are also playing elsewhere.

Imagine most of the weekend will be spent between the Pyramid and Kids Field.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, CaledonianGonzo said:

The 1975 accepting a billed non headline slot is them tacitly admitting that their moment has been and gone. Foals and Biffy have faced up to it, but who knows whether her that guy in the The 1975 will.

 

Edit: Crossed wires. Didn't realise people were discussing Pulp.

To be fair The 1975 are most definitely in the Foals/Biffy corridor of uncertainty.

It’s a bit like going bald, eventually you just have to accept it and suddenly life becomes much happier.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Hugh Jass II said:

Yeah I’m going to Finsbury too, easily the gig I’m most looking forward to in 2023.

Taking the kids to GF this year which means I have to be a lot more realistic in terms of how much I’m actually going to see. Won’t be cramming into the JP secret sets or anything like that. Which is why I’m not taking any chances on acts I’d want to see at Glastonbury who are also playing elsewhere.

Imagine most of the weekend will be spent between the Pyramid and Kids Field.

Makes sense.

To be honest, the idea of squashing into JP doesn't massively appeal to me either!

In some ways I'm expecting to go at a more relaxed pace as going with a friend who's quite ill but determined to get there. If we only see two or three main stage acts a day and spend a lot of time in the less busy areas I'll be happy, though. And then hopefully have a bit more energy for the late night stuff for once.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Zoo Music Girl said:

Makes sense.

To be honest, the idea of squashing into JP doesn't massively appeal to me either!

In some ways I'm expecting to go at a more relaxed pace as going with a friend who's quite ill but determined to get there. If we only see two or three main stage acts a day and spend a lot of time in the less busy areas I'll be happy, though. And then hopefully have a bit more energy for the late night stuff for once.

Mrs J has already said she doesn’t fancy AM and will happily take the kids to bed early that night so hoping for something big on another stage. Prodigy or YYY’s would do nicely.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just thinking back to Emily’s “we have to get GnR” comments, can’t remember exactly when she said it but I do wonder at what stage in discussions they were at when she made those comments. Seems unlikely that she’d be bigging up acts with no intention of playing so you’d expect there to have at least been some contact. Was an agreement already in place by then?

Reminds me of her similar comments around Fleetwood Mac in 2019, who I remain convinced would have headlined by now had Covid not scuppered everything for a couple of years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Hugh Jass II said:

Just thinking back to Emily’s “we have to get GnR” comments, can’t remember exactly when she said it but I do wonder at what stage in discussions they were at when she made those comments. Seems unlikely that she’d be bigging up acts with no intention of playing so you’d expect there to have at least been some contact. Was an agreement already in place by then?

Reminds me of her similar comments around Fleetwood Mac in 2019, who I remain convinced would have headlined by now had Covid not scuppered everything for a couple of years.

Yeah I think the theory I saw here the other day (can’t remember from who…) that it’s actually Elton who was Taylor’s replacement rather than GnR, who have been booked all along, is probably accurate. Would make a lot of sense if Taylor deciding to tour the States coincided with Elton moving that Paris date to make room for Glastonbury. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, FloorFiller said:

Yeah I think the theory I saw here the other day (can’t remember from who…) that it’s actually Elton who was Taylor’s replacement rather than GnR, who have been booked all along, is probably accurate. Would make a lot of sense if Taylor deciding to tour the States coincided with Elton moving that Paris date to make room for Glastonbury. 

Makes sense, Elton shifting that Paris date definitely suggests he was a late call up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Matt42 said:

Elton put that Paris date in absolutely yonks ago though. I think it was in way before the 2022 festival. Perhaps as early as late 2021…

Yep - looking at it, mid September 2021.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/6/2023 at 8:32 PM, roughbloke said:

Glasto headliners this year

reading headliners this year 

Glasto headliners last year 

reading last year 

APE headliners the year before that (I think - the where massive attack had a day and The Kooks)

LCD doing 6 brixtons 

Phoebe bridgers 

the prodigy coming back 

but Neil gets stuck on a prediction of Madonna headlining 

Got anything on APE this year may i ask? Was it you who said the strokes (if not can you confirm?)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, SwallowOrSleepOnTheWetSpot said:

IDGAF if she plays Glasto or not, but this whole "you either stand with her or you're with the far right" narrative on the internet is insufferable AF.

You need to go and read some of Ozannes' posts in the Discussion forum. Very similar (only political rather than musical) 🙂

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, CaledonianGonzo said:

Elton is a special booking. At this specific point in time there's noone better that they could have booked.

100%. It’s amazing anyone is suggesting he’s anything less than an iconic booking. Better than Macca, for me. It’ll be an all timer for sure. What G23 will be remembered for.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Hugh Jass II said:

To be fair The 1975 are most definitely in the Foals/Biffy corridor of uncertainty.

It’s a bit like going bald, eventually you just have to accept it and suddenly life becomes much happier.

Not sure tbh, I think 1975 are much bigger than both of those? Foals are dull as dishwater for me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, FloorFiller said:

Yeah I think the theory I saw here the other day (can’t remember from who…) that it’s actually Elton who was Taylor’s replacement rather than GnR, who have been booked all along, is probably accurate. Would make a lot of sense if Taylor deciding to tour the States coincided with Elton moving that Paris date to make room for Glastonbury. 

Yeah I suggested that the other day. While Elton obviously had the Paris date planned for a while, Emily talking up GnR ages ago makes me think they’ve been lined up in some form for a while. We never really know how early the headliners are booked but going for Elton John last spring/summer after it became clear that Taylor wouldn’t be touring Europe seems sensible to me. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...