Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Headliners 2023


Crazyfool01

Recommended Posts

I see Neil has come back into the thread to completely derail the conversation again around his dislike for a band. To the random point that we're now talking about if tickets will sell during the resale. Hilarious. 

 

You're right, you are old and jaded.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I appreciate this is the headliners thread but it looks like we’ve got:

Elton John, Arctic Monkeys, Guns N Roses, Lizzo, Queens of the Stone Age, Sam Smith, Lewis Capaldi, Pulp and The Prodigy as pretty much guarantees.   I know not all will suit people but I’d say it’s a fairly good start 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, sisco said:

I appreciate this is the headliners thread but it looks like we’ve got:

Elton John, Arctic Monkeys, Guns N Roses, Lizzo, Queens of the Stone Age, Sam Smith, Lewis Capaldi, Pulp and The Prodigy as pretty much guarantees.   I know not all will suit people but I’d say it’s a fairly good start 

Still don't think Pulp. Wishful thinking and a GSH doesn't a slot make.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Neil said:

glastonbury sells out without an act being announced because up to now, punters can realistically expect three top-notch headliners and a top notch line-up across the rest.  looks like they've spoilt that this year.

Are you sure Neil? Most people buy into the Glastonbury experience as a whole (whether they're old timers or newbie's). The headliners help but aren't essential IMO. The rest of the lineup hasn't been announced yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Neil said:

glastonbury sells out without an act being announced because up to now, punters can realistically expect three top-notch headliners and a top notch line-up across the rest.  looks like they've spoilt that this year.

I disagree, I think most festivals since it started selling out have had one poor headliner. Mumfords, The Verve, Kasabian, etc. Its only been the last few fests it's been consistently solid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, DeanoL said:

I disagree, I think most festivals since it started selling out have had one poor headliner. Mumfords, The Verve, Kasabian, etc. Its only been the last few fests it's been consistently solid.

Since 2010 it's sold out on the day, it's sold out under 2 hours since 2013. That's 10 festivals. 

https://theglastonburythingy.weebly.com/when-does.html

Edited by chazwwe
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, gigpusher said:

There are a huge number of people who could learn from her [Lizzo] although it amazes me how many people bring that very tiny incident up and yet people who have had kids take out restraining orders against them people hope are headlining the Other Stage. 

Because it went against her whole brand, that's why. People don't like hypocrites.

IDGAF if she plays Glasto or not, but this whole "you either stand with her or you're with the far right" narrative on the internet is insufferable AF.

Edited by SwallowOrSleepOnTheWetSpot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, sisco said:

I appreciate this is the headliners thread but it looks like we’ve got:

Elton John, Arctic Monkeys, Guns N Roses, Lizzo, Queens of the Stone Age, Sam Smith, Lewis Capaldi, Pulp and The Prodigy as pretty much guarantees.   I know not all will suit people but I’d say it’s a fairly good start 

I can appreciate how good that is for many, but of those acts there are only two I'd see, and they could easily clash with each other. I'd probably turn up for Pulp as well, if they're there.

Edited by kalifire
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Ommadawn said:

Are you sure Neil? Most people buy into the Glastonbury experience as a whole (whether they're old timers or newbie's). The headliners help but aren't essential IMO. The rest of the lineup hasn't been announced yet.

Headliners are an indication of where things are at with the bookings, if the headliners are less applealing then thats reflected for the rest. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But AM were always expected, and Elton John is a great booking.

So you're pinning all of that comment basically on GnR. What you're saying is that the entire lineup of the festival will be worse based entirely on the fact that GnR are playing.

Which makes absolutely no sense whatsoever.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/3/2023 at 4:27 PM, Matt42 said:

Think we are only talking about them in contention to 2024 because they are not touring in 2023. The main rumours are that the tour was looked at for 2023 but isn’t happening, and is happening in 2024 instead.

For whatever it's worth (and even if this is true I doubt it has any relevance to either Glastonbury or PP), there now seems to be a lot of chatter about FF headlining at Bonnaroo this year. Guess we'll find out next week.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, SwallowOrSleepOnTheWetSpot said:

Whole lotta people here need to touch grass and log back on once the lineup drops

so they can moan the same moans all over again then? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Neil said:

Headliners are an indication of where things are at with the bookings, if the headliners are less applealing then thats reflected for the rest. 

Again, that's just not true. 

If they were shit headliners, which they are not, that's only the indicator of who's available and big enough to headline the Pyramid. It has no reflection on who else is touring that could play the 5 main stages, who's available in the house/techno/dnb scene or anywhere else. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guns N Roses headline stadiums and huge venues all over the world

They're doing a date at BST this year which has shared Headers with Glastonbury for years.

This whole…. They’re not suitable to headline Glastonbury/loads of tickets are going to be returned because of them business is very very weird and boring. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Coldplay, Stereophonics and Rod Stewart headlined in the same year at one point and this years trio is seen as weak?!

Again, we’ve been massively spoiled in the past, especially over the last decade or so where they really upped the anti on securing as many big hitters as possible, so every once in a while we’re gonna get a trio that looks a little less special, and the argument could be made that this year’s is just that, but… they’re also three huge acts who play and often sell out stadiums, so it’s certainly more a matter of personal opinion, but alas, I’m sure Neil will be back on the next page to regurgitate his same old talking points once again as if they’re fact, and then again every day until lineup day, resale day, festival day etc…

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, CaledonianGonzo said:

Elton is a special booking. At this specific point in time there's noone better that they could have booked.

Yeah I agree. I think the fact that he’s toured non stop for two years straight might’ve taken the shine off a little in a lot of peoples eyes, but him doing his last ever U.K. show at Glastonbury is massive and I can’t think of a better way to close off Glastonbury ‘23 than his set of wall to wall hits. Gonna be a proper euphoric tearjerker, and Christ do I hope I get to be there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...