Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Headliners 2023


Crazyfool01

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, gfa said:

Don't disagree, just completely forgot what the original point even was now (i don't think you even made it!)

They suggested that for those of us who may not know many of an artists songs we should pencil in a weekend to listen to all 6 albums in readiness for their set. 

I'm happy that some people are so enthused, however my issue isn't that I don't know more than those handful of tunes I did like - I've heard more and didn't enjoy them. 

There'll be 99 other stages I can enjoy 😊

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Pr0paneNightm4re said:

Guessing she’s way too big for legend slot? 

Won't do it for the fee regardless

18 minutes ago, FloorFiller said:

100% not gonna be reasonable. Can’t remember what her pricing was last time she toured but I’m guessing it wasn’t cheap, and this being billed as a greatest hits tour is sure to add an extra couple of quid on top of that. 

Don't forget ticketmaster's new baby, surge pricing

Link to comment
Share on other sites

AM - 100% - Favourite band. Literally nowhere in the world I would rather be on that night than watching them on the pyramid.

GNR - 60% - Not a massive fan by any means but I like the classics. Would never pay the £100+ it would cost to see them at their own show so this will probably be my only chance. Will see them if there's not a band I love playing somewhere else, and I'm sure I'll have a good time.

Elton - 90% - Pretty similar to GNR for me, not a huge fan but like the classics. It being his last ever UK show means it would take something pretty special elsewhere to pull me away. Plus my Dad is a big fan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Arctics - 0% 

Been there done that, like them on record, but they are not a live band 

GNR - 20%

Will see what else is on, but fully expect there to be a better option. A few mates are keen so if there's nothing else that takes my fancy I'll go and slide away if they're shit 

Elton - 100% 

Act of the weekend for my lot, we'll be there in sequins and glitter living our best life 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Hugh Jass II said:

At least we can put those stupid Eminem rumours to bed for another year.

The Harry Styles stuff was always going to be bullshit too.

Personally, these were my top two I wanted to see there.... alongside Elton 🤣 so I'm going to keep the rumours going for 2024 then!! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Bike_Like_A_Mum said:

Personally, these were my top two I wanted to see there.... alongside Elton 🤣 so I'm going to keep the rumours going for 2024 then!! 

Said from day one that Belgium gig rules Styles out.

Eminem feels an even worse fit than people keep saying GnR are.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Arctic Monkeys -0%, absolutely zero interest in them. Will happily be elsewhere. 

guns n roses - 50% ,  would swerve them if something really notable is elsewhere but a bit of a singalong and a pile of me mates would be quite tempting. Would reserve the right to abandon them after an hour if it wasn’t really floating my boat. 

Elton - 99% chance, someone plugged the alternative of Pavement at the JP Sunday night and that really would make me sweaty of palm while i decided between those two 😬 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, topmarksbri said:

people loved shillings and ounces, the future's now old man 

Got nowt to do with that. My point was that your point stating fractional odds are for cretins is inherently wrong... Decimal odds are for whoever, but certainly more useful for cretins than people who can actually understand numbers. No shame in admitting you ain't topmarks, bri. 😘

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, theglastokid said:

AM - Loved first two albums, not so much the rest. Not the greatest frontman in terms of taking to the audience either. Never seen them live though so I'll see who they are up against first.

GNR - I know Sweet Child O' Mine, Paradise City and November Rain only really (like most people) so 2 hours to just hear those three may be better spent elsewhere.

Elton - He was playing small cricket grounds a few years back so not sure why some are saying it's a massive coup? Voice had gone to pub singer standard so really not sure although I said I would only watch 2 songs of Macca and head to Jamie T but I stayed and watched the lot and glad I did. If he's up against Prodigy though I'll be off.

 

I think that’s missing the point, that was just his preference in terms of how he wanted to tour, lots of smaller far more intimate venues. 

It’s not like he could only sell out cricket grounds and provincial football grounds, he could’ve just filled stadiums and arenas over fewer dates instead if he wanted.

He has only ever done one festival and now he’s doing the biggest festival in the world for the first time, it’s definitely a big deal.

Edited by Jose Pose
Link to comment
Share on other sites

AM = 30% - Will see them if there is nothing else on, only seen them once before and that was back in 2005. Loved their first album but has diminishing returns for me since then.

GNR = 0% - Having said that, if there is literally nothing else on I want to see I might walk across the back of the field on my way to the SE corner

Elton = 95% - Not on my bucket list like Macca was, would have to be pretty strong to pull me away though

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, Superscally said:

Got nowt to do with that. My point was that your point stating fractional odds are for cretins is inherently wrong... Decimal odds are for whoever, but certainly more useful for cretins than people who can actually understand numbers. No shame in admitting you ain't topmarks, bri. 😘

Nonsense. True champs write their fractional odds in binary anyway 🤷🏿‍♂️

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, The Nal said:

I wouldn't even have Elton headlining the Avalon tent.

 

37 minutes ago, The Nal said:

2nd or 3rd down below The Sugababes and whatever other kitch guff they cobbled together last minute.

Andi Peters or someone like that.

 

Spot on there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Superscally said:

Got nowt to do with that. My point was that your point stating fractional odds are for cretins is inherently wrong... Decimal odds are for whoever, but certainly more useful for cretins than people who can actually understand numbers. No shame in admitting you ain't topmarks, bri. 😘

couldn't hear you over your rattling zimmer frame and clicking dentures 

Edited by topmarksbri
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...