Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Headliners 2023


Crazyfool01

Recommended Posts

21 minutes ago, she bangs the drums said:

They sold out a World Tour with hundreds of dates, including two at Tottenham Stadium at £100 to £250 a time.....Axl voice was decent when he sang for AC/DC and was for much of the World Tour where they played 3 hour sets. They only played 2 hours and less in UK because he had an issue with his voice. Like them or not, they are one of the biggest bands in the world.

Don’t doubt for one minute they’re one of the biggest bands and i probably would go see them the Saturday night but just think given their history of being late/cutting sets short/Axl’s voice makes them a questionable booking for the Saturday especially.

personally I think Dua will headline the Saturday and stick around the festival to come out during Elton’s set.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Gnomicide said:

I really do wish they'd fuck off. Every bloody interview they bring up Glastonbury then finally admit they've never been asked, let's hope it stays that way.

I need to like this post daily for at least the next decade. Absolutely 100% spot on. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, Supernintendo Chalmers said:

Yikes, that's a hot take. Although I agree that the Chems have possibly oversaturated themselves in the past five years, the suggestion that Camelphat's output is superior (even against Tom and Ed's recent work) is a hard one to get on board with. I'd like to see the Chems veer off into something slightly less formulaic in the future but their live show is still up there with most top tier electronic acts

Camelphat can't be put in the same sentence as Chems.

Another act that would be nowhere if they didn't have the backing of Liverpool. Proper flaccid House.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really need to remember that GnR headlining is actually good, as it gives me a chance to not be at the Pyramid for at least one night. Such a weird dichotomy where you want amazing headliners but actually you also kinda want at least one to be a bit shit or not to your tastes. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, Gnomicide said:

I really do wish they'd fuck off. Every bloody interview they bring up Glastonbury then finally admit they've never been asked, let's hope it stays that way.

If only these Glastonbury related mentions could be monitored using a handy website for tracking events 🤔

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TGCarr said:

Imagine getting so angry about saying CB ain’t the greatest.

 

so so so many better DJ’s

... and you just did it again.

 

It's akin to saying that you don't rate Pulp because you don't like Jarvis's 6music show.

But to be fair, I do agree with this part - there are loads of DJs who are better then the Chemical Brothers (they'd tell you same thing themselves too).

Edited by Homer
Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, Gnomicide said:

I really do wish they'd fuck off. Every bloody interview they bring up Glastonbury then finally admit they've never been asked, let's hope it stays that way.

Honestly the desperation from them is actually quite embarrassing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Hugh Jass II said:

Having failed with Elton we now have fold trying to shoehorn GnR, one of the biggest and most successful rock bands of all time, into a non-headline slot.

I love this place sometimes.

It’s called a forum. 

One band playing third down in a special guest slot, one band headline-only. 🤪

Weird stuff happens sometimes. It almost certainly won’t this time, but it’s worth discussing.

73D9FA80-E6B4-4BCB-BC5E-69B7A1C6298A.jpeg

767C9618-3323-4F74-B1AD-072FC3AFD4B3.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Zacko said:

I really need to remember that GnR headlining is actually good, as it gives me a chance to not be at the Pyramid for at least one night. Such a weird dichotomy where you want amazing headliners but actually you also kinda want at least one to be a bit shit or not to your tastes. 

AM's sleeping pill of a show will be a very easy skip for me. That new album is a turkey, and I stand by what I said 4 years ago in regards to TBHC - if it wasn't AM performing it, people wouldn't care in the slightest. In the same way that some Tool fans would listen to Maynard fart into a microphone for an hour and call it genius. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, dreams_burn_down said:

I guess if Blur are playing, this on Friday is the only slot they could realistically do. Seems unlikely but would love to be proved wrong!

I mean, Blur/Pulp/Elton would explain how they were actually able to finally afford Elton's fee. Pay him all three headliner fees and give Jarvis and Damon a cookie.

Although honestly Pulp/Dua Lipa/Elton actually sounds like a viable possibility to me

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Radiochicken said:

It’s called a forum. 

One band playing third down in a special guest slot, one band headline-only. 🤪

Weird stuff happens sometimes. It almost certainly won’t this time, but it’s worth discussing.

73D9FA80-E6B4-4BCB-BC5E-69B7A1C6298A.jpeg

767C9618-3323-4F74-B1AD-072FC3AFD4B3.jpeg

Worth pointing out though that Aerosmith formed in 1969 (I think?) and have largely been active ever since.  GnR formed around 1985, then pretty much did fuck all from 1995-2008.  In terms of years actively recording and releasing music, you aren't really comparing apples with apples here.  Plus the 70's (when Aerosmith were at their pomp) was a real high water mark in time for physical album sales.  I'd argue that GnR are the bigger band.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, BenG92 said:

AM's sleeping pill of a show will be a very easy skip for me. That new album is a turkey, and I stand by what I said 4 years ago in regards to TBHC - if it wasn't AM performing it, people wouldn't care in the slightest. In the same way that some Tool fans would listen to Maynard fart into a microphone for an hour and call it genius. 

Yeah I don't think I'll be there and their potential booking doesn't excite me at all, but I did love them as a teenager so I reckon there's a chance if I'm on the right level I might pop along for nostalgia sake, maybe...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, 4AssedMonkey said:

Worth pointing out though that Aerosmith formed in 1969 (I think?) and have largely been active ever since.  GnR formed around 1985, then pretty much did fuck all from 1995-2008.  In terms of years actively recording and releasing music, you aren't really comparing apples with apples here.  Plus the 70's (when Aerosmith were at their pomp) was a real high water mark in time for physical album sales.  I'd argue that GnR are the bigger band.

100%

I'm 31 and my formative music years were in that period of fuck all, and yet Appetite for Destruction, an album released 4 years before I was born, was just the biggest thing amongst my friends for a while. They're the sound of immaturity to my ears now, mind

Also, Aerosmith's best known tune is a Run DMC track

Edited by Alcatraz
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Alcatraz said:

100%

I'm 31 and my formative music years were in that period of fuck all, and yet Appetite for Destruction, an album released 4 years before I was born, was just the biggest thing amongst my friends for a while. They're the sound of immaturity to my ears now, mind

Also, Aerosmith's best known tune is a Run DMC track

Or that w*nky ballad from the Armageddon soundtrack that gets rolled out by unimaginative people at weddings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Hugh Jass II said:

Arctic Monkeys are almost certainly playing.

GnR probably are too.

People keep saying that but then people kept saying Elton was doing BST until earlier today.

I have different reasons for thinking both AM and GnR aren't playing. But the idea that it'd be a trio of AM/GnR/Elton just doesn't scan for me. I can see not having a woman on, I can see not having a younger act on. I can't see both happening. If someone had posted that trio on day one they'd be laughed out of the thread.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, DeanoL said:

People keep saying that but then people kept saying Elton was doing BST until earlier today.

I have different reasons for thinking both AM and GnR aren't playing. But the idea that it'd be a trio of AM/GnR/Elton just doesn't scan for me. I can see not having a woman on, I can see not having a younger act on. I can't see both happening. If someone had posted that trio on day one they'd be laughed out of the thread.

My gut instinct tells me the same.  As a trio of headliners it just doesn't seem like something they'd entertain, unless they had no choice of course.  Out of AM and GnR, it's GnR that feels the odd one out.  AM/Dua Lipa/Elton plus GnR in Legends slot feels more like it but I can't see GnR playing Glasto and NOT headlining the Pyramid.

Realise it's still very much speculation.  Could even turn out that neither AM nor GnR play and we get a huge curveball.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...