Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Headliners 2023


Crazyfool01

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Hugh Jass II said:

Always thought Coachella sounded shit.

The thought of it being full of people like suprefan makes it even worse.

Just a lot of people walking around trying to convince themselves of why its okay to pay $900 for a Taylor Swift gig and how lucky the UK are for only paying £150 for a Blur gig. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, chazwwe said:

Your comments on anyone commenting on Coachella are hilarious. It comes across that you need to protect it. 

Just saying. Come January when that poster hits its gonna be a bunch of "ehhh, who are these people and why are they billed so high. Why is it a tik tok festival. Where are the real bands". 🤷🏻‍♂️

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Suprefan said:

Just saying. Come January when that poster hits its gonna be a bunch of "ehhh, who are these people and why are they billed so high. Why is it a tik tok festival. Where are the real bands". 🤷🏻‍♂️

Alternatively, like every other post of yours, nobody will say that but will claim everyone is anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Suprefan said:

Just saying. Come January when that poster hits its gonna be a bunch of "ehhh, who are these people and why are they billed so high. Why is it a tik tok festival. Where are the real bands". 🤷🏻‍♂️

So what you're saying is. A few people (like <5) have said 'those headliners look cool' and your response is 'well yeah but wait to you see the undercard, I bet you'll hate it then!' Why do you care if people like the headliners and not the undercard? Why are you trying to protect a multi million $ making festival on a mainly UK festival forum. Get over yourself. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, chazwwe said:

So what you're saying is. A few people (like <5) have said 'those headliners look cool' and your response is 'well yeah but wait to you see the undercard, I bet you'll hate it then!' Why do you care if people like the headliners and not the undercard? Why are you trying to protect a multi million $ making festival on a mainly UK festival forum. Get over yourself. 

It’s almost as if Suprefan invents things to be angry about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, chazwwe said:

Why are you trying to protect a multi million $ making festival on a mainly UK festival forum. Get over yourself. 

Why does he come on a Glastonbury forum when he’s never been to Glastonbury. It’s like us going on a Coachella forum and banging on about Glastonbury. Strange!! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, stuie said:

Why does he come on a Glastonbury forum when he’s never been to Glastonbury. It’s like us going on a Coachella forum and banging on about Glastonbury. Strange!! 

Pretty sure he has been to glastonbury.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Hugh Jass II said:

Will she have new material by next June? Would be a shame if she’s stepping out on El Pointo supporting an album that’ll be three years old by then.

She could do a Stormzy and just have 1 or 2 singles ready by then, with the next album coming out in the autumn. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Radiochicken said:

It was always slightly weird Dua didn’t carry over from 2020 considering she was touring in EU at the time.

By all accounts she was meant to be headlining Other opposite Macca in 2020. My best guess is that by the time 22 was being booked she’d gotten too big for that slot and either her or the festival decided to wait for a shot at the big one.

Edited by Hugh Jass II
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Hugh Jass II said:

By all accounts she was meant to be headlining Other opposite Macca in 2020. My best guess is that by the time 22 was being booked she’d gotten too big for that slot and either her or the festival decided to wait for a shot at the big one.

It wouldn’t surprise me for 2023 if they held slots for AM, Taylor, Elton - and Taylor/Elton didn’t materialise, so they drafted in GNR and Dua. 

 

3 minutes ago, Hugh Jass II said:

Elton to come out and guest with Dua, and enjoy it so much he finally agrees to headline the following year.

It’s not a rumour period if Elton isn’t teasing with dates. It will be interesting once his dates dry up and this forever tour ends whether we still continue to rumour him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, kalifire said:

On what basis? Has there been any extra evidence other than the relatively flimsy basis they’re already rumoured? 

No, nothing, Matt always does this. One rumour and they're a lock if he thinks it fits. Eminem and Rhianna have also been rumoured to the same level. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Matt42 said:

It wouldn’t surprise me for 2023 if they held slots for AM, Taylor, Elton - and Taylor/Elton didn’t materialise, so they drafted in GNR and Dua. 

 

They almost certainly tried tried to book the original three for last year and given how early Billie was announced Taylor must have said no early on and they jumped on Billie as soon as it became apparent she was available.

Given Emily’s comments about Taylor she’ll have first refusal every year until she finally does it. Dua feels the natural reserve for next year if she’s about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...