Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Headliners 2023


Crazyfool01

Recommended Posts

31 minutes ago, sisco said:

But not actually the worst trip is it.  Harry subbed by Lizzo who he loves.  I’m not ruling it out 

His journey from Belgium to the Farm would be less mileage than if he was playing Glasgow the night before. But for some reason, getting across a small stretch of water to do the gig, means it's impossible in some people's eyes. However the same people wouldn't bat an eyelid, and would probably be saying he is nailed on, if he was due to be playing in Glasgow the night before. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know odds shorten on money bet, and that more money bet is an indicator of information or likelihood, BUT, that list has 2 acts categorically ruled out, 2 very unlikely due to conflicting dates and a couple not even active. Think a huge pinch of salt is required here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He will be in the UK the days before the Belgium date, he can easily leave staging in the UK/ send it to Glastonbury.

Belgium is extremely close. He could leave the morning of Glastonbury and get in fine. Takes less than 2 hours.

I just think it’s not that unrealistic he would be looped in with those dates.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, MEGABOWL said:

Would love Reg but got a bad feeling about that. It’s not Styles because of the tour dates. Gonna put some cash on Lizzo.

Lizzo absolutely won’t headline glastonbury. Really looking in the wrong direction there.

Her latest album flopped really bad. Didn’t make an impact really at all.

If she plays she will take a prominent place on the lineup, but headliner? Nope

Edited by Matt42
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 4AssedMonkey said:

I know odds shorten on money bet, and that more money bet is an indicator of information or likelihood, BUT, that list has 2 acts categorically ruled out, 2 very unlikely due to conflicting dates and a couple not even active. Think a huge pinch of salt is required here.

Aye, a bit circular isn't it? Discussion here and elsewhere feeds the odds, which get fed back into the discussion and so it continues. 

Please oh mighty farm, feed us some news... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, p.pete said:

Somewhere towards the front by any chance?  I would have loved to have been there, but not at the festival at all sadly, so can't say how I'd have managed with the setlist.  I loved Radiohead last time they played, I was fairly central and forward so everyone around me was staying put and loving it, but I fully accept that further back I think the general reception was 'meh'.

Nope. Second repeater back. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Harmonic Prospector said:

His journey from Belgium to the Farm would be less mileage than if he was playing Glasgow the night before. But for some reason, getting across a small stretch of water to do the gig, means it's impossible in some people's eyes. However the same people wouldn't bat an eyelid, and would probably be saying he is nailed on, if he was due to be playing in Glasgow the night before. 

No. Two nights before perhaps. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Matt42 said:

Lizzo absolutely won’t headline glastonbury. Really looking in the wrong direction there.

Her latest album flopped really bad. Didn’t make an impact really at all.

If she plays she will take a prominent place on the lineup, but headliner? Nope

Really don’t think I am. I had her down as a sub but after the meltdown I witnessed in 2019 I can see her getting the big call to balance out an AM/GNR trio. I’m no totally convinced but convinced enough to put a tenner on at 33/1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, MEGABOWL said:

Really don’t think I am. I had her down as a sub but after the meltdown I witnessed in 2019 I can see her getting the big call to balance out an AM/GNR trio. I’m no totally convinced but convinced enough to put a tenner on at 33/1

She’s never had a 1 album and she’s only had 1 album chart in the UK top 10.

She’s absolutely not a Glastonbury headliner, especially after this era.

But of course I won’t discourage you from wasting some money if you want to do it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, addicted2noise said:

I've heard there's absolutely no chance of the Arctic Monkeys headlining, from a 100% legit source.

Other people have said they’ve heard from a 100% legit source that they are definitely nailed on though

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’d like a SuperBowl style Eminem, Dre, Ice Cube kind of huge hip hop headline collab for the Saturday night at the pyramid. Well, if it was up to me it’d be at west holts or the JP so I can get front and centre, but still: that’s what I want! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MEGABOWL said:

Really don’t think I am. I had her down as a sub but after the meltdown I witnessed in 2019 I can see her getting the big call to balance out an AM/GNR trio. I’m no totally convinced but convinced enough to put a tenner on at 33/1

May as well burn the money, probably a cheaper way to keep warm these days as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...