Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

U.S. Presidential Election


FloorFiller

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Haan said:

Nixon, Clinton, Bush... 

They all seem like role model leaders in comparison to him though. It's not a surprise during his time in office he has always been critical of any reasonable and democratically elected leader and expressed his admiration for dictators. The frustrating thing is how little of a surprise it is. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, jump said:

I am curious to see if Trump's ban on Twitter & Facebook will piss off his supporters in doing something else. There's already complaints that their/Trumps freedom of speech is already being taken away when there was just disclaimers and freedom of speech is one of those buzzy phrases that get folk riled up.

All the hardcore trumptards have already moved on to their own right wing friendly social media site. The FBI will already have that well infiltrated. 
 

This will just mean a end to the casual trumptard who will hopefully forget about his antics soon and not get radicalised. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, maelzoid said:

 

The ineffectualness of the police force here is shocking.

The disparity between this and their treatment of BLM protesters is one thing, but regardless, this is indefensibly poor work.

They were ridiculously outnumbered. Don't think the officers could have done much in that situation, but seems extremely poorly planned. 4 or 5 officers and one fence is really all that defends their parliament? 😮

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, squirrelarmy said:

All the hardcore trumptards have already moved on to their own right wing friendly social media site. The FBI will already have that well infiltrated. 
 

This will just mean a end to the casual trumptard who will hopefully forget about his antics soon and not get radicalised. 

Although it's a much smaller scale, the Milo Yianopollis stuff shows that de-platforming does work

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, found home in 2009 said:

They were ridiculously outnumbered. Don't think the officers could have done much in that situation, but seems extremely poorly planned. 4 or 5 officers and one fence is really all that defends their parliament? 😮

Not normally but the usual security and back up force were stood down on Trumps orders. You just have to see the level of security Trump ordered for the BLM protests to see what should have really been there yesterday. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, maelzoid said:

 

The ineffectualness of the police force here is shocking.

The disparity between this and their treatment of BLM protesters is one thing, but regardless, this is indefensibly poor work.

Being ineffectual and being totally overwhelmed in numerical terms are totally different things. They had no chance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Haan said:

Although it's a much smaller scale, the Milo Yianopollis stuff shows that de-platforming does work

god I forgot about him, what a knob. I don't even know who the big hitters are any more, the Milo/PJW/Hopkins/Alex Jones days seem to be over. Are they all just bouncing off the Parler walls now? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, squirrelarmy said:

All the hardcore trumptards have already moved on to their own right wing friendly social media site. The FBI will already have that well infiltrated. 
 

This will just mean a end to the casual trumptard who will hopefully forget about his antics soon and not get radicalised. 

Have you actually seen how nuts Parler is? It’s literally a QAnon black hole

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Matt42 said:

Have you actually seen how nuts Parler is? It’s literally a QAnon black hole

I’ve no intention of having a look in there but if an average person like me knows about it then you know the intelligence services are going to be well entrenched in there monitoring the people and conversations. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, FloorFiller said:

I really thought all these objectors would hold up proceedings a bit longer.

It’s so so sweet that Trump is currently banned from Twitter so has to wait until later for his whiney response/rejection of it all.

The only reason they didnt take longer was because a bunch of terrorists came in and disrupted their disruption. Mitch then had all day to talk em down and thats why only Pennsylvania had one other than Arizona.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, squirrelarmy said:

I’ve no intention of having a look in there but if an average person like me knows about it then you know the intelligence services are going to be well entrenched in there monitoring the people and conversations. 

@parlertakes on Twitter is a pretty good look at the madness that happens there without actually having to sign up to it. Funnily enough, you need photo I.D. to sign up and a lot of the plotting of the senate takeover was done there, so the FBI must be having a field day. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, found home in 2009 said:

They were ridiculously outnumbered. Don't think the officers could have done much in that situation, but seems extremely poorly planned. 4 or 5 officers and one fence is really all that defends their parliament? 😮

This is one example of the ramped up security thats possible when authorized. They were guarding a statue and were all essentially mercenaries because they bore no military designation or rank. It was planned all along to have such low security. They hopefully investigate as to why there was a lack of it when there was 100,000 people not too far from the building and knew there were likely plans to try and take over the building.

8EA69C8C-A355-46C2-A706-A3B51B42275E.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Suprefan said:

The only reason they didnt take longer was because a bunch of terrorists came in and disrupted their disruption. Mitch then had all day to talk em down and thats why only Pennsylvania had one other than Arizona.

Hadn't thought of it that way.

They lost the election(s)

Lost all but one of the legal challenges

And then they actually sped up the process to confirm the results

They really are fucking useless at this aren't they?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, philipsteak said:

Hadn't thought of it that way.

They lost the election(s)

Lost all but one of the legal challenges

And then they actually sped up the process to confirm the results

They really are fucking useless at this aren't they?

Yep. You shouldve seen the faces on the news correspondents having to watch a glorified version of CSpan and just rolling their eyes wondering why the hell does it take so long to count votes lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, Suprefan said:

This is one example of the ramped up security thats possible when authorized. They were guarding a statue and were all essentially mercenaries because they bore no military designation or rank. It was planned all along to have such low security. They hopefully investigate as to why there was a lack of it when there was 100,000 people not too far from the building and knew there were likely plans to try and take over the building.

8EA69C8C-A355-46C2-A706-A3B51B42275E.jpeg

Correct. But you can't apportion blame to the individuals who were trying to cope with that yesterday. If there was any collusion or direction, it was coming from way above them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...