Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

U.S. Presidential Election


FloorFiller

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, Copperface said:

Correct. But you can't apportion blame to the individuals who were trying to cope with that yesterday. If there was any collusion or direction, it was coming from way above them.

Yeah you can. Their orders were to not beat up white people to a bloody pulp. same thing went to the police that came in to clear them out and just pushed them. They easily wouldve done the bad stuff if they were equipped to do so, but initially were not.
 

also this. If it quacks like a duck....

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There were good cops and bad cops there yesterday and it seems they were given free reign to choose whichever side they liked - stop the MAGAts or allow them through and take selfies. They were outnumbered from the get-go, but especially if half of them chose to not to fulfil their duty properly. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Suprefan said:

Yeah you can. Their orders were to not beat up white people to a bloody pulp. same thing went to the police that came in to clear them out and just pushed them. They easily wouldve done the bad stuff if they were equipped to do so, but initially were not.
 

also this. If it quacks like a duck....

 

 

 

Apart from the unarmed woman fatally shot of course. I've watched that out of context 9 second clip and all I can hear is ACAB being shouted repeatedly, and can't work out if someone is taking a selfie, or showing something on the screen. I would suggest the impartiality of the poster of this clip who has titled it like that is open to question as well, looking at his timeline.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, FloorFiller said:

@parlertakes on Twitter is a pretty good look at the madness that happens there without actually having to sign up to it. Funnily enough, you need photo I.D. to sign up and a lot of the plotting of the senate takeover was done there, so the FBI must be having a field day. 

Yep, a right wing echo chamber, set up by the people behind Cambridge Analytica that demands all your personal info. They'll be having a field day with all that info. And all the right wing conspiracy nuts are handing it over unquestioningly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Ozanne said:

Nancy Pelosi has called on the VP and Cabinet to invoke the 25th and if they don't then the House will look to impeach. 

Yep I'm going to be watching CNN all night to see how this goes. He can't be allowed to get away with this. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, gigpusher said:

Yep I'm going to be watching CNN all night to see how this goes. He can't be allowed to get away with this. 

Something will happen, whether it will be enough or in time will be key. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, crazyfool1 said:

What does impeaching actually do though ? He looses the presidency a few days early and can’t return ? Not sure ... 

If he's impeached then his case will be sent to the Senate for them to judge. If he's convicted in the Senate then he is removed from office. He shouldn't be able to run again, but I have seen some say that a President could be able to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, crazyfool1 said:

What does impeaching actually do though ? He looses the presidency a few days early and can’t return ? Not sure ... 

Don't think he is allowed to run again if successfully impeached. That would help. He'd also the the only President not to be acquitted if he was found guilty. Probably more as well, but that's the kicker for the mango mussolini....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He’d be the first twice impeached president, and this late on, an official blotch on his presidency like that along with his removal from office is good enough. 

This all should’ve happened a long time ago, but you’ve gotta take the victories you can get at this point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, FloorFiller said:

Not sure if this is something he can actually do (especially without admitting to crimes beforehand) but I like the idea of there now being a race between the 25th/impeachment being put in to action and him attempting to pardon himself:

 

Somebody make me pick the lotto numbers now. 
 

Itll get challenged in courts and I could see SCOTUS say that he cannot do it. As bad as some of the justices are, some of them hate this kind of overreach moreso when it comes to application of executive powers

. Also, this means that he has zero confidence in Pence with a transfer of power. And he is scheduled to be at Camp David this weekend. They have no golf course hahaha.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...