Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

U.S. Presidential Election


FloorFiller

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, squirrelarmy said:

Trumps Twitter probably going to be unlocked in about half an hours time. He will likely to be asleep though but be ready for ranting to resume

How long before they boot him permanently do you reckon?

If he doesn't wind it in I give him until the end of the week.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, squirrelarmy said:

Trumps Twitter probably going to be unlocked in about half an hours time. He will likely to be asleep though but be ready for ranting to resume

Really hoping for another ‘I WON THE ELECTION’. Need a good belly laugh after last night. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, eFestivals said:

what you mean is that Manhattan changed. Whether it was Rudi's policies can be reasonably disputed.

The timing coincided with the reduction of lead (from petrol) in the air - which has seen big falls in inner city crimespots located on traffic-busy areas.

It might be coincidental of course - it can't be absolutely proven - but there's a strong correlation with lead reduction all around the world (and with the lead reduction happening at different times all round the world).

It will be of course due to a number of factors and not just one.

Did hear a program which talked about it years back and they had a couple of the people that came up with the various elements which were used on policing and other parts. Can't remember much.

 

Never too sure about the lead link at all really, how ever could play a part of course but heard it debunked a few times

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Quark said:

How long before they boot him permanently do you reckon?

If he doesn't wind it in I give him until the end of the week.

One of the conditions of the temporary ban is that he has to delete the inciting tweets. If he doesn’t then he will get permabanned. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, fred quimby said:

It will be of course due to a number of factors and not just one.

Did hear a program which talked about it years back and they had a couple of the people that came up with the various elements which were used on policing and other parts. Can't remember much.

 

Never too sure about the lead link at all really, how ever could play a part of course but heard it debunked a few times

I thought Bloomberg was the one who properly cleaned up NY, apart from the iffy stop and frisk program his time seemed to have done the trick.

I would have loved Bloomberg to get the Democratic choice last year just so he can tell Trump he's not actually a Billionaire like how he is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, jump said:

I thought Bloomberg was the one who properly cleaned up NY, apart from the iffy stop and frisk program his time seemed to have done the trick.

I would have loved Bloomberg to get the Democratic choice last year just so he can tell Trump he's not actually a Billionaire like how he is.

That is the chaps name, well one of them, thanks. They did talk about the stop and search helped a lot, but done in a certain way (can't remember the details though)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, jump said:

I would have loved Bloomberg to get the Democratic choice last year just so he can tell Trump he's not actually a Billionaire like how he is.

I'm deeply glad he didn't get the nomination. The stop and frisk was enough to rule him out for me, but I'm pleased it didn't set the precedent that the presidency is only open to the uber rich, that essentially it is for sale if you can afford it.

I know that it is looking likely that Trump was not the billionaire he claims to be, but at the time he still had access to a supply of cash that meant he could outspend any and all rivals if he needed to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, fred quimby said:

That is the chaps name, well one of them, thanks. They did talk about the stop and search helped a lot, but done in a certain way (can't remember the details though)

Basically Stop and Search was heavily targeting black people which he eventually apologized for. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh, Gulianni is also a raging alcoholic who used to ring up Trump begging for jobs to pay off his numerous divorces (see: Borat).

Trump used to laugh at him. Not sure what changed - prob cause jobs are doled out due to loyalty as opposed to ability (see: the Mafia/the current Conservative cabinet).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...