Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

When will this shit end?


Chrisp1986

Recommended Posts

32 minutes ago, jimmillen said:

Humans are very bad at intuitively assessing systematic risk, that’s why people worry more about terrorism (for example) than road traffic accidents. High impact low probability events - things that are novel and unusual - tend to carry a disproportionate weight in people’s opinions  

The media then reinforce this by focusing more on those very unusual events - the clue’s in the word “news” after all…

I agree that we should be doing more about all those things you mention and a sense of proportion about it would be welcome. 

However there is one big difference with COVID… The number of patients with cancer, heart disease, obesity etc is almost certainly not going to grow exponentially. Any changes will be slow, linear and to some extent predictable based on leading indicators that public health folk study.

COVID - or any other rapidly transmissible disease - OTOH can go from nothing to thousands of cases in weeks.

So basically, it’s less about the absolute death numbers per se, and much more about preserving the integrity of the healthcare system. Not least so people with all those other conditions can get the treatment they need.

 

Sensible, fair observations. Although people with the other conditions manifestly haven’t been getting the required treatments in the main, but I do accept your points

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, mike46 said:

 

I think this fixation on overall case numbers we have as a country is really bad. If we did this with any other novel virus, we’d never leave the house - if we could test for the flu, I guarantee every day during winter we’d see a few dozen thousand, but that doesn’t impact us.

 

The difference with flu is it remains static at a few thousand. COVID is massively more transmittable, so a few thousands becomes tens of thousands in a very short period of time.

14 hours ago, Barry Fish said:

You are a right bellend.  We hardly did any testing back in the early days l.  3600 cases in may 2020 would of been a hell of a lot more in reality 

This is true. Not that he's a bellend. But on the case numbers. Imperial did some modelling on this and while I can't find the dataset online, they've estimated that on 27 April the 4310 new cases were actually 23000.

12 hours ago, Barry Fish said:

How can this not result in unlocking? Surely its time 

That 65% reduction in hospitalisation seems low? If it's right, then that's the problem - we need to be looking at a 99%+ reduction in hospitalisations to deal with uncontrolled growth. But from what I've seen from the figures we are?

11 hours ago, BobWillis2 said:

One thing the government must show on Monday is what level of risk and death we have to accept going forward. 

We need something to base everything off, is opening on the 21st going to put us above that level? Is a 2 week delay going to keep us below that level? If not what is. 

I'm sure it's still based on not overwhelming the NHS - they wouldn't be considering this for any other reason. I think part of the issue is the data is all over the place. Cases should go up and hospitalisations should go up with them, but consistently. At a much lower percentage than pre-vax but there should be a relationship. Bolton is weird - that's not happening and there's no good explanation why. In other places the numbers are so small at the moment it's not enough data to properly extrapolate it up. Which is also a good problem to have. Signs are good and all that - but until the scientists have plausible explanations for why the data is doing what it is doing, they can't predict what hospitalisations will be with 10x or 100x the number of cases. 

I think they were expecting to find "okay, in the vaxxed population hospitalisation is 10x less than it was so we are fine as long as cases stay below this number - and with the current R rate they will" - but instead the data is just, well, weird. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, zahidf said:

Also worth noting is that we havent had any chatter from NHS front line staff about the NHS being close to being overwhelmed. Which we had at this stage last Dec

 

I did hear that hospitals are pretty busy with the backlog of non covid stuff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, Barry Fish said:

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/music/news/vaccine-segregation-helping-live-music-return-us-not-britain/

The difference between  the USA and the UK is more stark by the day.  No masks inside theme parks and concerts all set to go.

Meanwhile we shit a brick over nothing.

I agree with Giddings in that article - just get tests involved for this summer and do it.

I'm still convinced it's political- mass gatherings "feel" dangerous to the older people and may damage their opinion polls. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, stuartbert two hats said:

Yeah, they managed to get prevalence way down and vaccination levels way up before being hit by Delta. We'll get there too.

 

We surely can't be that far away. Just read that 70 percent of over20s in Israel have 2 doses and covid has absolutely collapsed. Obv we have let this new variant take hold which was dumb as fuck but even with that we will get there in the coming weeks considering our take up could be nearer 90% in adults.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, efcfanwirral said:

I agree with Giddings in that article - just get tests involved for this summer and do it.

I'm still convinced it's political- mass gatherings "feel" dangerous to the older people and may damage their opinion polls. 

It’s entirely political.

 

An outdoor mass gathering of 50,000 without social distancing is probably safer than an indoor gathering of just a few hundred. Ventilation shits all over all other covid secure measures.

 

The only argument that holds any water for why outdoor mass gatherings can be banned is that the buses and trains travelling to and from the event are a covid risk, even then I’d say that’s an argument for pre-event testing and vaccine passports rather than banning them outright. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The EU is on the final straight to introduce a vaccination certificate and, for example, in Poland, the current indications are that it will be the only possible way to enter a concert in the near future.

Personally, I have no problem with the fact that only vaccinated people could participate in mass events. Although there are also voices that it is sanitary segregation (especially in social media) and the well-known Polish band Kult has issued a statement that they believe this is apartheid.

In the UK, vaccination passport plans have reportedly been abandoned. I wonder if this plan will come back?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Last year, when we weren't sure if/when we would get a vaccine, the PM was talking about how testing would be the key to getting mass events back (remember Operation Moonshot?)

That has not changed. With or without vaccines, testing is the key to getting these things going again so let's do it. If people are unhappy with so called 'vaccination passports' to access these events for now then tough.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, fraybentos1 said:

We surely can't be that far away. Just read that 70 percent of over20s in Israel have 2 doses and covid has absolutely collapsed. Obv we have let this new variant take hold which was dumb as fuck but even with that we will get there in the coming weeks considering our take up could be nearer 90% in adults.

Anecdotally, 25+ yr olds are being booked in for September.

Edit: not that that means it will take us until September to get to a threshold where R dips below 1.

Edited by stuartbert two hats
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Fuzzy Afro said:

It’s entirely political.

 

An outdoor mass gathering of 50,000 without social distancing is probably safer than an indoor gathering of just a few hundred. Ventilation shits all over all other covid secure measures.

 

The only argument that holds any water for why outdoor mass gatherings can be banned is that the buses and trains travelling to and from the event are a covid risk, even then I’d say that’s an argument for pre-event testing and vaccine passports rather than banning them outright. 

This is it- and that's only for the big big ones. An outdoor event of 5,000 people probably won't cause that much of an issue. For bigger ones staggered entry times (open up way earlier, no music til normal time but have bars open) 

With testing involved its surely safer than even the socially distanced pub next door if people are sitting inside. 

Even Wales are allowing events of a certain size 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Kusy said:

The EU is on the final straight to introduce a vaccination certificate and, for example, in Poland, the current indications are that it will be the only possible way to enter a concert in the near future.

Personally, I have no problem with the fact that only vaccinated people could participate in mass events. Although there are also voices that it is sanitary segregation (especially in social media) and the well-known Polish band Kult has issued a statement that they believe this is apartheid.

In the UK, vaccination passport plans have reportedly been abandoned. I wonder if this plan will come back?

It 100% will. No testing option in EU? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, stuartbert two hats said:

Anecdotally, 25+ yr olds are being booked in for September.

Seeing this too among my own mates, late August/early September for second doses, with first doses coming as early as this weekend.

 

I think the second doses will be brought forward if supply allows. As things stand we have JCVI groups 1-9 roughly fully vaccinated at this point. The coming weeks will see first doses for 25-29 and second doses for those in their 40’s, then towards the end of this month we’ll finish vaccinating the 18 and overs.

 

Then come early July we will run out of people to vaccinate, so at that point I think we will bring forward second doses starting with those in their 30’s. 
 

I can see everyone being offered a second dose by the end of August if supply allows. 

3 minutes ago, Kusy said:

The EU is on the final straight to introduce a vaccination certificate and, for example, in Poland, the current indications are that it will be the only possible way to enter a concert in the near future.

Personally, I have no problem with the fact that only vaccinated people could participate in mass events. Although there are also voices that it is sanitary segregation (especially in social media) and the well-known Polish band Kult has issued a statement that they believe this is apartheid.

In the UK, vaccination passport plans have reportedly been abandoned. I wonder if this plan will come back?

There should always be the option of taking a Lateral Flow Test as an alternative to being vaccinated but I have no problem with people having to prove their covid status to get in to events. 

3 minutes ago, efcfanwirral said:

D

 

Michie is an absolute communist moron. I hate her. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, efcfanwirral said:

It 100% will. No testing option in EU? 

Dunno about the rest UE, but Poland offers only entry for fully vaxed. 

Fest Festival (James bay, Nothing but thieves, Rag n Bone Man confirmed) said that they plan go to with this. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, efcfanwirral said:

It 100% will. No testing option in EU? 

Yes, vaccination status, negative test or proof of recovery from PCR confirmed Covid in the last 9 months are the three options in the EU green pass.  

 

Edit: I should add that Ireland is a bit of an outlier on this as we currently won't accept rapid tests, but most other places will. They were rigorously tested here and the review group recommended their use, but our CMO is ideologically against them (he's being hauled before the Dáil to explain his position as most of the other people that gave evidence disagree with him...he basically thinks people will get a negative test and go nuts). Hopefully they will see sense and recognise their value, rather than insisting on PCR testing in the previous 72 hours.

 

edit again: in fact, the idealogical opposition to LFTs means that our pilot events (an outdoor concert in Iveagh Gardens, Leinster Rugby V Dragons and some GAA) all take place this month without prior testing (which is brave!). 

Edited by Toilet Duck
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, stuartbert two hats said:

Anecdotally, 25+ yr olds are being booked in for September.

Edit: not that that means it will take us until September to get to a threshold where R dips below 1.

For their second doses aye?

My pals are getting there first doses for late June/ start of July and they're 25, just outside glasgow. That would make it nearly october for 2nd doses

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It would be a very bold move to use pure vaccine passports with no testing option. Doing that before all adults have been offered a vaccine is a non-starter as it’s discriminatory and would have lawsuits coming in left, right and centre, but even after all adults have been offered one I still see a testing option being offered.

 

And to be honest there’s no reason not to. Given that the vaccines are not 100% effective, you can probably have more confidence that an unvaccinated person with a negative LFT is covid-free compared to a fully vaccinated person without an LFT. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Fuzzy Afro said:

It would be a very bold move to use pure vaccine passports with no testing option. Doing that before all adults have been offered a vaccine is a non-starter as it’s discriminatory and would have lawsuits coming in left, right and centre, but even after all adults have been offered one I still see a testing option being offered.

 

And to be honest there’s no reason not to. Given that the vaccines are not 100% effective, you can probably have more confidence that an unvaccinated person with a negative LFT is covid-free compared to a fully vaccinated person without an LFT. 

yeah, there are talks with the gov to include test. Maybe they'll go with it from 1 July. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Fuzzy Afro said:

It would be a very bold move to use pure vaccine passports with no testing option. Doing that before all adults have been offered a vaccine is a non-starter as it’s discriminatory and would have lawsuits coming in left, right and centre, but even after all adults have been offered one I still see a testing option being offered.

 

And to be honest there’s no reason not to. Given that the vaccines are not 100% effective, you can probably have more confidence that an unvaccinated person with a negative LFT is covid-free compared to a fully vaccinated person without an LFT. 

Hope you're right! 

To be honest that last paragraph is one of my main reasons I'm so against the idea of vaccine only like new york - Yes it vastly reduces the chances but like you say its not 100%, so it feels more like aan extension of the psychological manipulation that gave us the fear campaign that currently has disproportionate amounts of 20somethings in fear for their lives. 

It feels like a compliance pass, and that can easily be extended to anything a future government wants- obesity as an example? Alcoholism? All put the NHS under strain

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Barry Fish said:

I can't watch right now.  What lifestyle changes does the crazy lady expect 

She's asked how long measurss should remain for and she said forever. To be fair to the host, she openly laughed at her (she seemed to think she was joking) but I'm not convinced she was joking at all...

Edited by efcfanwirral
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • In August 2009, in his Spectator blog he wrote about Harriet Harman, deputy leader of the Labour Party, in unflattering terms. Liddle began the article by asking: "So — Harriet Harman, then. Would you? I mean after a few beers obviously, not while you were sober."[27] Tanya Gold wrote in The Guardian that Liddle had delivered a "tissue-thin polemic." Pointing out that it was The Spectator's cover story that week.[28] Rachel Cooke in The Observer nearly two months later recalled finding Liddle's piece "disgusting"[29] Cooke went on to say: "I would still like to do something really unpleasant to the man who wrote [the article]." Liddle said two months later that the Harman column "was supposed to be a parody of guttural, base sexism", a joke he assumed readers would understand. After the negative response from Gold (and then Cooke, among other female journalists) he continued: "And then I suppose I came to the conclusion – gradually – that I must have got it wrong."[30] In June 2014, he said that of those he had offended, Harman was the one person to whom he would apologise.[31] In November 2009, again for The Spectator website, he offered "a quick update on what the Muslim savages are up to," a brief article about the stoning to death of a 20-year-old woman in Somalia after she was accused of adultery, and the similar death of a 13-year-old the year before. He made remarks, considered sarcastic, that read: "Incidentally, many Somalis have come to Britain as immigrants recently, where they are widely admired for their strong work ethic, respect for the law and keen, piercing, intelligence."[32][33] In December 2009, on his Spectator blog, Liddle referred to two black music producers, Brandon Jolie and Kingsley Ogundele, who had plotted to kill Jolie's 15-year-old pregnant girlfriend, as "human filth" and said the incident was not an anomaly. He continued: When he was accused of racism, Liddle said he was instead engaging in a debate about multiculturalism.[35][36] In March 2010 the Press Complaints Commission (PCC) upheld a complaint against Liddle, who became the first journalist to be censured over the contents of a blog, because he had not been able to prove his claim about the crime statistics.[37] After the publication of London crime figures in June 2010, The Sunday Telegraph suggested Liddle was largely right on some of his claims, but that he was probably wrong on his claims about knife crimes and violent sex crimes.[38] In October 2010, Liddle called for the abolition of the Welsh language TV channel S4C as a result of the 2010 Comprehensive Spending Review. In his article for The Spectator, he described Welsh nationalists as "miserable, seaweed munching, sheep-bothering pinch-faced hill-tribes".[39] On 23 May 2013, Liddle wrote about the murder of soldier Lee Rigby near the Royal Artillery Barracks in Woolwich, London. In the original version of a blog article for The Spectator, he referred to the perpetrators as "two black savages".[40] After many objections to his language use,[41] this phrase was modified.[42] Liddle apologised.[40][43] Giving a speech at Durham University in December 2021, Liddle said: "It is fairly easily proven that colonialism is not remotely the major cause of Africa's problems, just as it is very easy to prove that the educational underachievement of British people of Caribbean descent or African Americans is nothing to do with institutional or structural racism."[44] Independent editor rumour and Millwall supporters' website The Guardian reported on 8 January 2010 that the expected purchase of The Independent by Alexander Lebedev, a Russian billionaire, would be followed by the appointment of Liddle as editor.[45] Roy Greenslade wrote on 11 January that the reports were provoking a "major internal and external revolt" by The Independent's staff and readers.[46] The stories about Liddle's posts on Millwall Online apparently further reduced the likelihood of his being offered the job.[47] Finally, on 19 February, Stephen Brook of The Guardian reported that Liddle was no longer in the running for the post.[48] Tim Luckhurst, professor of journalism at the University of Kent, argued that Liddle's prospects of editing The Independent were nullified "by the people behind a viciously intolerant campaign of liberal bigotry".[49] In January 2010, the press drew attention to allegedly racist and misogynist comments posted under the username "monkeymfc"—a name Liddle has used—on Millwall Online, a fan club web forum with no official connection to Millwall Football Club. Liddle attributed some of the comments to opposition fans logging in under his name to embarrass him. He later said he had written some of the posts that were being criticised, including one in support of the BNP excluding Black and Asian people from the party.[50] Another post, in which he joked about not being able to smoke at Auschwitz,[51] led to his being asked to explain what he meant in The Jewish Chronicle.[47] While he said in June 2014 that his comments were taken out of context, he said that he did not regret making them. "No. Never. Absolutely not. I thought about my mates at Millwall Online, God I respect them so much more than these other people, these ghastly f**king people."[31] Stephen Lawrence, disabled and transgender people In November 2011, an article by Liddle for The Spectator suggested the trial of two men accused (and later convicted) of murdering Stephen Lawrence would not be fair.[52] It was referred to the Attorney General Dominic Grieve by the judge for possible contempt of court,[53] and he ordered the jurors not to read it. Having decided that it might have breached a court order, Grieve passed the case on to the Crown Prosecution Service and the Director of Public Prosecutions.[54] The decision that The Spectator was to be prosecuted by the CPS for breaching reporting restrictions was announced on 9 May 2012, with a court hearing scheduled for 7 June, although Liddle as the author was not himself liable for prosecution. Fraser Nelson, the magazine's editor, announced that the prosecution would not be contested,[55] and the magazine pleaded guilty at the hearing. The fine was £3,000, plus £2,000 compensation to Stephen Lawrence's parents and £625 costs.[56] In January 2012, Liddle wrote that many people in the UK were "pretending to be disabled" in his column for The Sun,[57] an opinion defended by James Delingpole.[58] Frances Ryan in The Guardian accused him of "belittling something that on a daily basis affects real people" who can be "a huge benefit to society. Maybe for a month Liddle would like to try that."[59] In May 2015, the Independent Press Standards Organisation (IPSO) upheld a complaint from Trans Media Watch that Liddle had been discriminatory towards Emily Brothers, a blind and transgender Labour candidate at the 2015 general election, in two Sun columns published in December 2014 and January 2015. In commenting in the way he had Liddle had breached two sections of the editors' code.[60][61] Column on poppers and gay sex During a parliamentary debate on the Psychoactive Substances Bill – which "makes it an offence to produce, supply, offer to supply, possess with intent to supply, possess on custodial premises, import or export psychoactive substances"[65] the Conservative politician Crispin Blunt admitted he used poppers: Liddle responded in his Spectator blog: The satirical and current affairs magazine Private Eye described this as hypocritical, pointing out Liddle's account in The Sunday Times of using Viagra in July 2004.[68][69] A spokesperson from the LGBT rights charity Stonewall said of Liddle's remarks: "Comments like this are shocking and damaging, but we wouldn't expect anything less from repeat offending bigots like Rod Liddle."[70] Column on Muslim voters In October 2019, Liddle penned a column in The Spectator commenting on the forthcoming December 2019 UK general election, which suggested that the election should be held on a Muslim holy day to reduce the Labour vote. The column was criticised by senior political figures including Chancellor of the Exchequer Sajid Javid and former Conservative Deputy Prime Minister David Lidington. Liddle defended the content as being humorous. The article also criticised the Labour MP Rosie Duffield's recent speech about her experience of trying to exit an abusive relationship; Duffield described the article as "racist and misogynistic".[74]
    • A true social democrat
    • I thought the same thing I thought when Baresi went which is there sure is a hell of alot of people who don't make the new pension age.
    • 1, The Menzingers- Everything I Ever Saw 2, Quicksand- Bring On The Psychics 3, Radkey- Bedroom Sand  
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...