Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

When will this shit end?


Chrisp1986

Recommended Posts

7 hours ago, Ozanne said:

Interesting thread:

 

Re: Clackmannanshire it's worth noting that nobody actually lives there so with a population so small the rates per 100,000 will shoot up when there is any kind of outbreak.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm genuinely confused now, so many people saying so many different things. One moment we're told vaccines are the way out, now we're basically being told they're not enough. One minute we're told cases matter, the next its only hospitalisations. There's so much uncertainty and everyone having opinions just makes it one huge ball of noise with no one truly knowing what to believe. I still think thing will be a lot better over the summer and we'll be able to have our freedoms, just need to keep on jabbing so I'm glad to see young people are going to help push us forward as well as everyone who's taken up the vaccine so far 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, mcshed said:

Re: Clackmannanshire it's worth noting that nobody actually lives there so with a population so small the rates per 100,000 will shoot up when there is any kind of outbreak.

I have family friends in the wee county and as far as I can tell they’re the only residents of Alloa who haven’t had covid yet

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Chapple12345 said:

I'm genuinely confused now, so many people saying so many different things. One moment we're told vaccines are the way out, now we're basically being told they're not enough. One minute we're told cases matter, the next its only hospitalisations. There's so much uncertainty and everyone having opinions just makes it one huge ball of noise with no one truly knowing what to believe. I still think thing will be a lot better over the summer and we'll be able to have our freedoms, just need to keep on jabbing so I'm glad to see young people are going to help push us forward as well as everyone who's taken up the vaccine so far 

I know what you mean. We need as many as possible vaccinated to prevent cases getting too high...because if cases get really high then there could still be a lot of people requiring hospital and/or dying......due to being unvaccinated or vaccines not being 100% effective...so like you say just need to keep jabbing, and hopefully that will prevent a big spike in cases this summer or the remainder of the year...and then we'll probably have to jab some more later in the year...jabtastic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, steviewevie said:

The vaccine rollout has been incredible and I'm glad people have taken it up but I'm worried if there was a big wave like this it would effectively undermine them and people wouldn't bother getting another one seeing as we were all told they were the best way out of it 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Toilet Duck said:

Crikey…I watch a quick Seinfeld before bed and there’s a ton of questions when I pick the phone back up! 
 

so…gaps and efficacy. For the mRNA ones, optimum gap is about 4 weeks, after that the antibody levels start to dip a bit. There was a trade off in the UK between more jabs and dwindling protection from 4-12 weeks, but any protection was better than none and it doesn’t appear to harm long term immunity if dose 2 is given later (as you would expect, but nice to know for sure). Almost everywhere else is using these vaccines with a 3-4 week gap (we use Pfizer with 4, Moderna with 3 or 4 as it’s currently mostly being used in pregnant women, so it depends on when the clinics are scheduled)…I’d do the same thing in your current position now (since 2 dose > 1 dose for delta)…

For AZ, there was a screw up in the trial where some participants got a half dose for their first one by accident (manufacturing issue in Italy I believe)…but, both LD:SD and SD:SD participants got varying gaps between doses (for a variety of reasons). When the data was first unblinded, AZ stormed ahead and said they had ~70% efficacy and it could be as high as 90%+ (with a half dose). By the time the authorisation submission was made, Oxford had fully analysed the data and saw that it was the longer gap that improved efficacy rather than the different doses (as SD:SD participants with a longer gap had better antibody responses too). This was all fairly clearly explained in the submission for emergency use authorisation. The increase in antibody response starts to plateau at about 8 or 9 weeks and there isn’t much additional benefit after that. But, some participants had waited up to 12 weeks to get their second dose. So when prioritising 1st doses, JCVI figured they could safely go to 12 weeks and, again, like the extended gap with Pfizer, get some protection into more people (as well as improving the effectiveness of AZ)  Most other places using AZ have gone with a similar gap (I think I said at the time I’d probably go for 8 or 9). At about 6 weeks, the response is still not that far off, so where full vaccination was required quickly, this gap has been used (for example, many healthcare workers here that got AZ had a 6 week gap…and cases have fallen off a cliff among them). So, quickest route to full vaccination with the vaccines ye have is probably, Pfizer with a 4 week gap, Moderna with a 3 week gap, AZ with an 8 week gap (6 if you have to) and one shot of J&J (or any vaccine) in people with PCR confirmed Covid in the last 9 months (as we get more data, that could extend out to ever having PCR confirmed Covid)…

As for the “if we were still only dealing with the Kent variant, R would be below 1” thing, it’s very hard to untangle that…delta is outcompeting it, so of course alpha cases are dropping. How much of that is vaccination or competition with a fitter variant is incredibly hard to model. I dare say a beta or gamma outbreak in a vaccinated population would outcompete delta (but luckily those outbreaks had to compete with alpha in a mostly immunologically naive population…would be a different proposition now and they are fitter variants in a vaccinated cohort due to superior vaccine escape compared to delta or alpha)...

 

edit: sorry, forgot to tag @Fuzzy Afro and @stuartbert two hats

 

Really inciteful this. thanks.

Given what you said then, in your opinion, do you think that there could be any further issues / negative effect given we're going 8-12 weeks across all the second jabs in the UK?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Chapple12345 said:

The vaccine rollout has been incredible and I'm glad people have taken it up but I'm worried if there was a big wave like this it would effectively undermine them and people wouldn't bother getting another one seeing as we were all told they were the best way out of it 

yeah...definitely....they need to make it very clear why we're getting a delay....just that not everyone vaccinated yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Stretlow said:

Really inciteful this. thanks.

Given what you said then, in your opinion, do you think that there could be any further issues / negative effect given we're going 8-12 weeks across all the second jabs in the UK?

 

Howdy, in terms of how good your immunity is after the second dose, no there shouldn't be any issue if the gap between prime and boost is longer. Though now that dose 2 is important, you can shorten that to 8 weeks for AZ and 3-4 weeks for the mRNA ones and get as many people to full vaccination as quickly as you can (assuming you have the supply). 

Edited by Toilet Duck
wrote dose instead of gap! Doh!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’d like to see a sense of perspective, let’s have daily figures on all preventable deaths. So this would include many cancers, deaths due to alcohol, drugs, smoking, obesity, poor lifestyles, road and travel, suicide, the flu, accidents, heart disease, and then what are we really doing about any of these? They vastly outnumber Covid deaths. Why aren’t we obsessed with these too? As the flu alone causes up to 20,000 deaths every winter, and due to lockdown last winter the flu was greatly reduced, what’s the argument for not locking down every winter? Why don’t those lives mean as much?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Avalon_Fields said:

I’d like to see a sense of perspective, let’s have daily figures on all preventable deaths. So this would include many cancers, deaths due to alcohol, drugs, smoking, obesity, poor lifestyles, road and travel, suicide, the flu, accidents, heart disease, and then what are we really doing about any of these? They vastly outnumber Covid deaths. Why aren’t we obsessed with these too? As the flu alone causes up to 20,000 deaths every winter, and due to lockdown last winter the flu was greatly reduced, what’s the argument for not locking down every winter? Why don’t those lives mean as much?

we don't lock down every winter because our health services can just about manage a bad flu outbreak...covid more infectious and deadly than flu, so unless we drastically expand our health services we have to have lockdown restrictions.

Anyway, vaccines.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Avalon_Fields said:

I’d like to see a sense of perspective, let’s have daily figures on all preventable deaths. So this would include many cancers, deaths due to alcohol, drugs, smoking, obesity, poor lifestyles, road and travel, suicide, the flu, accidents, heart disease, and then what are we really doing about any of these? They vastly outnumber Covid deaths. Why aren’t we obsessed with these too? As the flu alone causes up to 20,000 deaths every winter, and due to lockdown last winter the flu was greatly reduced, what’s the argument for not locking down every winter? Why don’t those lives mean as much?

we are obsessed with this because it is current and we now have very different forms of media .... this will become less so when another story comes along .... we are 'used" to the flu ... its not a new thing ... although many winters we get newspaper headlines about it because it is a story at the moment .... the pandemic is very fresh and very raw and still current because of the numbers lost to it .... it will become less so but that will take time and other news 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Toilet Duck said:

Howdy, in terms of how good your immunity is after the second dose, no there shouldn't be any issue if the gap between prime and boost is longer. Though now that dose 2 is important, you can shorten that to 8 weeks for AZ and 3-4 weeks for the mRNA ones and get as many people to full vaccination as quickly as you can (assuming you have the supply). 

Good to hear, thanks for this.

 

I had 1 Pfizer on 11th may so 8 weeks is 6th July but i'm not booked in yet.. need to sort it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Chapple12345 said:

I'm genuinely confused now, so many people saying so many different things. One moment we're told vaccines are the way out, now we're basically being told they're not enough. One minute we're told cases matter, the next its only hospitalisations. There's so much uncertainty and everyone having opinions just makes it one huge ball of noise with no one truly knowing what to believe. I still think thing will be a lot better over the summer and we'll be able to have our freedoms, just need to keep on jabbing so I'm glad to see young people are going to help push us forward as well as everyone who's taken up the vaccine so far 

Its really not that complicated.

The viruses is moving quickly, due to a new variant and not enough people have been vaccinated....

Vaccines are the way out, but they need more time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Barry Fish said:

The most likely outcome for the future is the people who would of died from flu where more than likely die from covid or flu.  It's unlikely covid will add additional deaths and hospitalisations in the future.  

id say the numbers will increase covid seems to hit some that flu isnt getting but with some overlap .... maybe an additional 50% more .... and this will slowly decrease 20,000 flu an additional 10,000 covid  in a bad year ..... although sadly for a few years covid may already have killed quite a few slightly before their time would normally have been up 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, JoeyT said:

I've pretty much resigned myself to life never returning to what it was after a long think about it all.

Convince me otherwise.

I think it's a tad melodromatic.

But there's a line of thought anyway that says humans are in for a rough few decades anyway, so quality of life will be shifting quite rapidly for everyone - pandemic or otherwise.

Personally, I'm of the opinion we are at the early stages of humanities collapse 🙂 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Barry Fish said:

That's only true if the vaccines didn't work but they do 

we have flu jabs ... sadly people still die  .... luckily most will have had the covid jab this year for some it wont work and some wont take it  , people will still die from covid alone ... its not going anywhere ... neither is flu maybe that vaccine can be made better so the overall numbers wont increase .... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Stretlow said:

Good to hear, thanks for this.

 

I had 1 Pfizer on 11th may so 8 weeks is 6th July but i'm not booked in yet.. need to sort it

Can everyone in the UK do this now? My partner is booked in for 11 weeks and when he tried to change the date the other day it only gave him options in that timeframe. He is under 40.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • In August 2009, in his Spectator blog he wrote about Harriet Harman, deputy leader of the Labour Party, in unflattering terms. Liddle began the article by asking: "So — Harriet Harman, then. Would you? I mean after a few beers obviously, not while you were sober."[27] Tanya Gold wrote in The Guardian that Liddle had delivered a "tissue-thin polemic." Pointing out that it was The Spectator's cover story that week.[28] Rachel Cooke in The Observer nearly two months later recalled finding Liddle's piece "disgusting"[29] Cooke went on to say: "I would still like to do something really unpleasant to the man who wrote [the article]." Liddle said two months later that the Harman column "was supposed to be a parody of guttural, base sexism", a joke he assumed readers would understand. After the negative response from Gold (and then Cooke, among other female journalists) he continued: "And then I suppose I came to the conclusion – gradually – that I must have got it wrong."[30] In June 2014, he said that of those he had offended, Harman was the one person to whom he would apologise.[31] In November 2009, again for The Spectator website, he offered "a quick update on what the Muslim savages are up to," a brief article about the stoning to death of a 20-year-old woman in Somalia after she was accused of adultery, and the similar death of a 13-year-old the year before. He made remarks, considered sarcastic, that read: "Incidentally, many Somalis have come to Britain as immigrants recently, where they are widely admired for their strong work ethic, respect for the law and keen, piercing, intelligence."[32][33] In December 2009, on his Spectator blog, Liddle referred to two black music producers, Brandon Jolie and Kingsley Ogundele, who had plotted to kill Jolie's 15-year-old pregnant girlfriend, as "human filth" and said the incident was not an anomaly. He continued: When he was accused of racism, Liddle said he was instead engaging in a debate about multiculturalism.[35][36] In March 2010 the Press Complaints Commission (PCC) upheld a complaint against Liddle, who became the first journalist to be censured over the contents of a blog, because he had not been able to prove his claim about the crime statistics.[37] After the publication of London crime figures in June 2010, The Sunday Telegraph suggested Liddle was largely right on some of his claims, but that he was probably wrong on his claims about knife crimes and violent sex crimes.[38] In October 2010, Liddle called for the abolition of the Welsh language TV channel S4C as a result of the 2010 Comprehensive Spending Review. In his article for The Spectator, he described Welsh nationalists as "miserable, seaweed munching, sheep-bothering pinch-faced hill-tribes".[39] On 23 May 2013, Liddle wrote about the murder of soldier Lee Rigby near the Royal Artillery Barracks in Woolwich, London. In the original version of a blog article for The Spectator, he referred to the perpetrators as "two black savages".[40] After many objections to his language use,[41] this phrase was modified.[42] Liddle apologised.[40][43] Giving a speech at Durham University in December 2021, Liddle said: "It is fairly easily proven that colonialism is not remotely the major cause of Africa's problems, just as it is very easy to prove that the educational underachievement of British people of Caribbean descent or African Americans is nothing to do with institutional or structural racism."[44] Independent editor rumour and Millwall supporters' website The Guardian reported on 8 January 2010 that the expected purchase of The Independent by Alexander Lebedev, a Russian billionaire, would be followed by the appointment of Liddle as editor.[45] Roy Greenslade wrote on 11 January that the reports were provoking a "major internal and external revolt" by The Independent's staff and readers.[46] The stories about Liddle's posts on Millwall Online apparently further reduced the likelihood of his being offered the job.[47] Finally, on 19 February, Stephen Brook of The Guardian reported that Liddle was no longer in the running for the post.[48] Tim Luckhurst, professor of journalism at the University of Kent, argued that Liddle's prospects of editing The Independent were nullified "by the people behind a viciously intolerant campaign of liberal bigotry".[49] In January 2010, the press drew attention to allegedly racist and misogynist comments posted under the username "monkeymfc"—a name Liddle has used—on Millwall Online, a fan club web forum with no official connection to Millwall Football Club. Liddle attributed some of the comments to opposition fans logging in under his name to embarrass him. He later said he had written some of the posts that were being criticised, including one in support of the BNP excluding Black and Asian people from the party.[50] Another post, in which he joked about not being able to smoke at Auschwitz,[51] led to his being asked to explain what he meant in The Jewish Chronicle.[47] While he said in June 2014 that his comments were taken out of context, he said that he did not regret making them. "No. Never. Absolutely not. I thought about my mates at Millwall Online, God I respect them so much more than these other people, these ghastly f**king people."[31] Stephen Lawrence, disabled and transgender people In November 2011, an article by Liddle for The Spectator suggested the trial of two men accused (and later convicted) of murdering Stephen Lawrence would not be fair.[52] It was referred to the Attorney General Dominic Grieve by the judge for possible contempt of court,[53] and he ordered the jurors not to read it. Having decided that it might have breached a court order, Grieve passed the case on to the Crown Prosecution Service and the Director of Public Prosecutions.[54] The decision that The Spectator was to be prosecuted by the CPS for breaching reporting restrictions was announced on 9 May 2012, with a court hearing scheduled for 7 June, although Liddle as the author was not himself liable for prosecution. Fraser Nelson, the magazine's editor, announced that the prosecution would not be contested,[55] and the magazine pleaded guilty at the hearing. The fine was £3,000, plus £2,000 compensation to Stephen Lawrence's parents and £625 costs.[56] In January 2012, Liddle wrote that many people in the UK were "pretending to be disabled" in his column for The Sun,[57] an opinion defended by James Delingpole.[58] Frances Ryan in The Guardian accused him of "belittling something that on a daily basis affects real people" who can be "a huge benefit to society. Maybe for a month Liddle would like to try that."[59] In May 2015, the Independent Press Standards Organisation (IPSO) upheld a complaint from Trans Media Watch that Liddle had been discriminatory towards Emily Brothers, a blind and transgender Labour candidate at the 2015 general election, in two Sun columns published in December 2014 and January 2015. In commenting in the way he had Liddle had breached two sections of the editors' code.[60][61] Column on poppers and gay sex During a parliamentary debate on the Psychoactive Substances Bill – which "makes it an offence to produce, supply, offer to supply, possess with intent to supply, possess on custodial premises, import or export psychoactive substances"[65] the Conservative politician Crispin Blunt admitted he used poppers: Liddle responded in his Spectator blog: The satirical and current affairs magazine Private Eye described this as hypocritical, pointing out Liddle's account in The Sunday Times of using Viagra in July 2004.[68][69] A spokesperson from the LGBT rights charity Stonewall said of Liddle's remarks: "Comments like this are shocking and damaging, but we wouldn't expect anything less from repeat offending bigots like Rod Liddle."[70] Column on Muslim voters In October 2019, Liddle penned a column in The Spectator commenting on the forthcoming December 2019 UK general election, which suggested that the election should be held on a Muslim holy day to reduce the Labour vote. The column was criticised by senior political figures including Chancellor of the Exchequer Sajid Javid and former Conservative Deputy Prime Minister David Lidington. Liddle defended the content as being humorous. The article also criticised the Labour MP Rosie Duffield's recent speech about her experience of trying to exit an abusive relationship; Duffield described the article as "racist and misogynistic".[74]
    • A true social democrat
    • I thought the same thing I thought when Baresi went which is there sure is a hell of alot of people who don't make the new pension age.
    • 1, The Menzingers- Everything I Ever Saw 2, Quicksand- Bring On The Psychics 3, Radkey- Bedroom Sand  
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...