Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

When will this shit end?


Chrisp1986

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, steviewevie said:

bit of a wtf...

 

Not really that much of a surprise.. The guidance is frequently changing to fit the current situation. Wouldn't surprise me if if it's a reaction to Nottingham/shire CCG attempting to move on to over 40s this week which meant myself and others were able to get done earlier than we were supposed to.

The Government has still promised all adults by July, and so once groups 1-9 are largely done the guidance will change again to allow for non-priority people.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, StuMalinas said:

Looks awesome, thanks for taking the time to do that, this presents a lot of information in a really well laid out format. I shall upvote once I have some in stock! Cheers 

No worries, thanks for feedback.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Ozanne said:

It's not clickbait. He's reporting it on Sky News now and it's official from the governments web site.

Read what I said. His text (headline) reads like under 50s will now not be offered vaccine at all. In reality, its during the 4 weeks. 

It's a deliberately misleading headline

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Ozanne said:

It's not clickbait. He's reporting it on Sky News now and it's official from the governments web site.

Of course it's clickbait. While he's reporting something that exists, it doesn't amount anything more than "don't move past the priority groups just yet" which was already the presumed policy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, incident said:

Of course it's clickbait. While he's reporting something that exists, it doesn't amount anything more than "don't move past the priority groups just yet" which was already the presumed policy.

No it's not clickbait, it's updated guidance that's come out and should be reported.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, steviewevie said:

must be. Surely this means war?

Sam Coates also just said on Sky News this has got nothing to do with the comments from the EU earlier on today.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Question for @Toilet Duck.

Assume you've been vaccinated, but that vaccine doesn't prevent infection (e.g. AZ vaccines against the SA variant), but you are protected against server disease through cellular immunity. If you are infected, are you likely to develop antibodies that make you resistant to future infections of this variant?  Your cellular immunity isn't going to cause any problems for you developing antibodies through natural infection rather than vaccination is it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, xxialac said:

It's obvious this is a setback, maybe not a major one, but a setback all the same.

Some were getting far too carried away and it shows the wisdom of the roadmap not being too aggressive on timing.

I don't think this is really even a setback. It's just par for course with manufacturing, they'll be some delays at some stage. I don't think it'll impact the roadmap, as you say they have the 5 week buffer built in for reasons just like this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Ozanne said:

No it's not clickbait, it's updated guidance that's come out and should be reported.

Updated guidance that amounts to exactly the same principles that areas were already expected to work to. It's worthy of reporting, but only as a footnote in an article, not pretending something significant has changed.

As I said previously, I suspect that it's only been formally spelled out because an area unexpectedly skipped straight to over 40s earlier this week before backtracking a few hours later.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Love him in in the next interview to say. "Oh f**k off i give up, what's the point in trying it's far to hard. Let some other c**t have go and see how they get on" Unplugs mic, cracks a can of special brew, and wonders off
    • and still twenty one pilots must have a very persuasive management team, unless they are still rearranging the schedule, still seems really odd. 
    • Phew, been waiting a while for a statement like this.     Well at least a few days since the last one
    • And there we go.  Bleech 9:3 added 
    • The only number I can find is 90k, but it doesn't really break it down in the way you're asking so it is up in the air in that regard. My only thing here is that I don't think Leeds is in danger or is flagging in sales. I thought last year had an awful lineup so I opted out but apparently a hell of a lot of people decided to go, so I really do believe it is just us lot all being out of touch with what the modern R&L audience wants.   I do think this year has a good lineup although I know a lot of people on here disagree with that, so I am gonna be there and we shall see what it is like on the ground this year in terms of attendance.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...