Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

When will this shit end?


Chrisp1986

Recommended Posts

  • Admin
Just now, zahidf said:
Germany is seeking advice on whether to delay giving the second dose of the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine to make supplies go further, in a similar move to the UK, according to a document seen by the Reuters news agency.

The country's health ministry has asked an independent vaccination commission for its opinion on administering the second shot later than 42 days after the first.

Ha! That'll fuck with their heads.

The UK has the data from the *approved* AZ vaccine to use as an indicator for one-dosing the pfizer vaccine, whereas Germany would essentially just be guessing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, topmarksbri said:

Right, but Londoners who travelled before the lockdown was announced (the vast majority of people I know) to the regions/outside of the city wouldn't show up on this anyway as it's London specific. So the actual damage caused by people travelling for xmas won't be in London itself but wherever they go. 

Yeah exactly, case numbers are rising around the country too. I shared a tweet last night which indicates we are starting to the results of Christmas mixing filtering through now. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, eFestivals said:

And just a cursory search proves you talking bollocks.

https://www.efestivals.co.uk/forums/search/?q="all restrictions"&quick=1

If you're having difficulty joining things up into a coherent whole, that's something else and your doing.

There are many, many examples of this but cba to post about 20 easily found links.

Even you did.

 

Edited by Copperface
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin
Just now, Copperface said:

Even you did.

No, that's you failing to join up the dots. I'm clearly not confident within those words, as well as it being a restated view from last April.

My view changes when the data changes. Everything changes with covid and you're spouting the same old shite like it's more meaningful than anyone else's take.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, topmarksbri said:

Might this indicate that xmas mixing not as bad as we thought it might be? We're presumably bang smack in the middle of when symptoms from that would start to show. Although I guess most people mixing for xmas would be people traveling outside of London. 

Yeah you weren't allowed to mix for Christmas in London, even for a day, so I don't think there would be much impact from that. And as you say anyone who did likely travelled out of London for it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Zoo Music Girl said:

Yeah you weren't allowed to mix for Christmas in London, even for a day, so I don't think there would be much impact from that. And as you say anyone who did likely travelled out of London for it.

You weren’t allowed to. Doesn’t mean it didn’t happen. If my Instagram feed is to be believed that rule was widely ignored both on Christmas and on NYE.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin
1 minute ago, Zoo Music Girl said:

Yeah you weren't allowed to mix for Christmas in London, even for a day, so I don't think there would be much impact from that. And as you say anyone who did likely travelled out of London for it.

Hmmm. I think you're expecting a bit much there.

Huge numbers will have mixed no matter what the rules say, and the vast majority of those will have justified it to themselves as somehow OK to do (and for many of them, it will have been OK to do).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Fuzzy Afro said:

You weren’t allowed to. Doesn’t mean it didn’t happen. If my Instagram feed is to be believed that rule was widely ignored both on Christmas and on NYE.

 

True but a lot of people who live in London have family outside it, which is kind of my point. Everyone we work with for example.

Basically just saying I wouldn't rely too much on London figures for the picture on Christmas mixing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, eFestivals said:

Hmmm. I think you're expecting a bit much there.

Huge numbers will have mixed no matter what the rules say, and the vast majority of those will have justified it to themselves as somehow OK to do (and for many of them, it will have been OK to do).

See above. Wasn't really saying people followed the rules, just that a lot of Londoners who broke them would have travelled out to do so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...