Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

When will this shit end?


Chrisp1986

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, MrBarry465 said:

It is good to see how positive Britains are on the vaccine and then you see the figures in France and the US. They will take much longer to escape it.

France had a proper lockdown as well.  Seems like they'll be locked down while we are vaccinated it seems unless they get some common sense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, crazyfool1 said:

And I think this will only grow the more that take it as people become more confident with others having had it ... in 6 months time it won’t be such a new thing anymore 

Maybe will work internationally too and France, USA and elsewhere will get more people willing to take the vaccine when they see it working in countries like UK and Israel...?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, dotdash79 said:


I can understand the extended dose times on the Oxford vaccine. But not the biotech one. 
 

mixing Oxford and biotech outside of a controlled study where people opt in is reckless. 

Why is it reckless? If it's been approved by the various regulators.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Leyrulion said:

Why is it reckless? If it's been approved by the various regulators.

Weirdly I was thinking the other day what would happen if by accident someone got the Pfizer vaccine and then the AZ one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, zahidf said:

Fair enough but if we are going up to the green bar, its pretty much of a muchness in real terms

What it shows is attitudes towards the vaccine changes fairly significantly as you go down through the age groups and therefore the level of risk changes. 

I don't understand why it's so unpalatable that those more at risk are far more likely to be less wary of a vaccine than those at the least risk of any serious harm from an illness. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Leyrulion said:

Why is it reckless? If it's been approved by the various regulators.

Because they have approved the 2 dose of the biotech and also 2 dose of the oxford. Not 1 of each. 
 

Until it’s done as a trial and the impacts are understood it’s unethical to do that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Leyrulion said:

Why is it reckless? If it's been approved by the various regulators.

 

This might give some insight into it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Leyrulion said:

Why is it reckless? If it's been approved by the various regulators.

Because it's never been tried. To be fair, the guidance does stress that you should try to keep the second dose to the same vaccine as the first one.

But still, it's pretty surprising how relaxed the UK regulators are about chopping and changing different vaccines when both are licensed for emergency use and are the first vaccines in their class to have ever been approved for use.

I'm very much on the "these vaccines appear to be safe" school of thought, but consider my eyebrows raised by their willingness to approve completely untested ways of using these drugs.

And yes, they're effectively Phase 4, but these are not double blind trials, this is a monitored roll out, quite different.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Ozanne said:

Weirdly I was thinking the other day what would happen if by accident someone got the Pfizer vaccine and then the AZ one.

Pfizer is 95% effective and Oxford is 70% effective so if you take both then you are 165% likely to not get covid 😉 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Fuzzy Afro said:

Pfizer is 95% effective and Oxford is 70% effective so if you take both then you are 165% likely to not get covid 😉 

You kid, but as a teenager, a girl I knew was convinced that mixing a 5.5% drink and a 7.5% drink would give you a 13% cocktail.

It was called a Blastaway, for those who know 😉

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, stuartbert two hats said:

You kid, but as a teenager, a girl I knew was convinced that mixing a 5.5% drink and a 7.5% drink would give you a 13% cocktail.

It was called a Blastaway, for those who know 😉

My drink of choice before a school disco ... diamond white and castaway if I remember correctly. On a semi relevant note I've just been unpacking christmas presents and had forgotten about this mug i got... shit present considering I don't drink tea or coffee but still love it.

IMG-20210101-WA0007.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, SheffJeff said:

My drink of choice before a school disco ... diamond white and castaway if I remember correctly. On a semi relevant note I've just been unpacking christmas presents and had forgotten about this mug i got... shit present considering I don't drink tea or coffee but still love it.

IMG-20210101-WA0007.jpg

You are, indeed, one of the people "who know"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Me too.  Reckon they must have more this year.   Not bad is it - ended up paying same price as this year.  It still represents great value for me.  Well, until I check my bank account the Monday after the weekend.
    • Well mayors have more powers to do that sh*t...but they have to make the numbers add up.
    • We'll see. Bristol and Leeds are both massively overdue big public transport investment - 2 of the cities with the worst transport infrastructure per capita in Western Europe. If this works to help support investment projects great and fair play to Burnham.
    • The Bródy Day was his idea because Sziget has always been late when it comes to this kind of concert. They would only organize farewell performances or tribute shows after an artist had passed away. Since Bródy is one of the country's greatest singer-songwriters, they wanted to honor him while he is still alive. (He didn't say it exactly like that, but the man is 80 and has just stopped playing large concerts.) He never understood why anyone would focus exclusively on one generation, especially Gen Z, who have less disposable income, drink less, and are, in his words, "afraid of partying." He explained that in the past, people loved festivals because of the nonstop partying, whereas many younger people today find that experience overwhelming or exhausting. That's one of the reasons why Sziget will introduce more chill zones and sensory-friendly spaces. They also want to attract older generations, who are generally more willing and able to spend money. The Sziget Icons days are aimed at this audience, and in the future they hope to create a more balanced lineup that appeals to people over 35 as well.   It was a long interview. If anything else comes to mind, I'll share it.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...