Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

When will this shit end?


Chrisp1986

Recommended Posts

13 minutes ago, Wellyboot said:

The current lokcdown may have only been 3 weeks so far for you, but for us up North its been pretty much the same from March up to now :lol: we had the big lockdown then straight into tier 3 and now this haha!! (i only say this cos I'm jealous if you had a little break from it all :) )

I have a grandma on my dad's side whos in her 80's and she's well scared so has been following all the rules (shes very asthmatic as well as lots of other health issues) but my grom & grandad on my mum's side, both in their 60's have had enough and - in the words of my grandad - are "still going about their business" 🙄 

Some people listen, some people dont I guess :D 

Ha - glad to hear at least some of you lot are behaving yourselves up there!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, st dan said:

How quickly for them to kick into action if an area is moving up/down a tier do we know? 
Assume it needs to be pretty sharp if cases are rising rapidly. 

It'll be like interest rates.....they'll go up instantly, but take weeks to come down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, mikegday said:

The Christmas rules make it clear that nowhere will be in Tier 1 come Christmas. Otherwise in T1 going out for Christmas dinner to a restaurant with another household would be ok - whereas it’s not ok under the Christmas rules.

Technically it doesn’t actually say. It says you can’t meet those in your Christmas bubble out in a pub, and you can’t meet those in out of the bubble in a ‘private dwelling’. Now you could take that to mean you can meet people outside of your bubble in a pub/restaurant if you tier allows. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Ozanne said:

Technically it doesn’t actually say. It says you can’t meet those in your Christmas bubble out in a pub, and you can’t meet those in out of the bubble in a ‘private dwelling’. Now you could take that to mean you can meet people outside of your bubble in a pub/restaurant if you tier allows. 

That’s how I read it... You can’t go ‘out’ for a meal with your Christmas bubble but you can meet up with others (socially distanced) in a hospitality setting?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Ozanne said:

Technically it doesn’t actually say. It says you can’t meet those in your Christmas bubble out in a pub, and you can’t meet those in out of the bubble in a ‘private dwelling’. Now you could take that to mean you can meet people outside of your bubble in a pub/restaurant if you tier allows. 

Technically ye, but for comms and compliance that would be a disaster. On same day you can meet household A and B in your house but not a restaurant, then you go and meet household C in a restaurant but not your house.

Because of how much of a mess that is even for this shambles of a Gov - surely these rules are based on them knowing no where will be in T1 come Christmas?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Fuzzy Afro said:

So basically each bubble must contain people from a maximum of three households, but you don’t necessarily need to stay in the same bubble as your entire household? 

Seems so. I think the guidance has specifically been put in place for flatshares, but I guess it would apply to other situations too? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Homer said:

Eh, how come the over-60s are going mental and breaking the rules? Aren't they more at risk?! I'm not even in an at risk group - but I still find the rules pretty easy to stick by generally (I mean, the current lockdown has only been three weeks so far!).

Boomers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Zoo Music Girl said:

Boomers.

There’s certainly a significant portion of oldies that take the view that they’re likely to be dead in the fairly near future of whatever cause (covid or otherwise) so they may as well live life to the fullest within that time. It’s difficult to allow that at the national level because of pressures on the NHS, pressures on others who are trying to avoid infection etc. But I can understand why an individual older person may take that view. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Fuzzy Afro said:

There’s certainly a significant portion of oldies that take the view that they’re likely to be dead in the fairly near future of whatever cause (covid or otherwise) so they may as well live life to the fullest within that time. It’s difficult to allow that at the national level because of pressures on the NHS, pressures on others who are trying to avoid infection etc. But I can understand why an individual older person may take that view. 

is there actual evidence that older people are less worried about carching the virus...or is this just all anecdotal?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Ryan1984 said:

That’s how I read it... You can’t go ‘out’ for a meal with your Christmas bubble but you can meet up with others (socially distanced) in a hospitality setting?

That’s how I read it too.

12 minutes ago, mikegday said:

Technically ye, but for comms and compliance that would be a disaster. On same day you can meet household A and B in your house but not a restaurant, then you go and meet household C in a restaurant but not your house.

Because of how much of a mess that is even for this shambles of a Gov - surely these rules are based on them knowing no where will be in T1 come Christmas?

You could be right with no one being in tier 1. If we go by what’s written as gospel in the rules then in tier 1 you can meet up in a pub for example with a friend not in your bubble. It does muddy the waters you are right, but then again the whole Christmas bubble thing does too in a way. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Ozanne said:

Technically it doesn’t actually say. It says you can’t meet those in your Christmas bubble out in a pub, and you can’t meet those in out of the bubble in a ‘private dwelling’. Now you could take that to mean you can meet people outside of your bubble in a pub/restaurant if you tier allows. 

Isn't it that you have to follow the rules for pubs and restaurants in the tier you are in? So, if you're in Tier 1, you could meet five people in a pub or restaurant. What it is saying is that the Christmas bubbles don't override this rule - you could have eight people in a bubble, but that doesn't mean you can all go to the pub together. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, duke88 said:

Isn't it that you have to follow the rules for pubs and restaurants in the tier you are in? So, if you're in Tier 1, you could meet five people in a pub or restaurant. What it is saying is that the Christmas bubbles don't override this rule - you could have eight people in a bubble, but that doesn't mean you can all go to the pub together. 

Pretty sure I read something saying you can't go to hospitality with your Christmas bubble:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/explainers-55056375

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, duke88 said:

Isn't it that you have to follow the rules for pubs and restaurants in the tier you are in? So, if you're in Tier 1, you could meet five people in a pub or restaurant. What it is saying is that the Christmas bubbles don't override this rule - you could have eight people in a bubble, but that doesn't mean you can all go to the pub together. 

The Christmas bubble applies to someone’s house you’ll be going to in those 5 days, but not out in a hospitality setting. Separate from that is the tier rules so if you are in tier 1 you could meet people not in your bubble in a pub (where you are supposed to social distance from them). 

Edited by Ozanne
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Fuzzy Afro said:

There’s certainly a significant portion of oldies that take the view that they’re likely to be dead in the fairly near future of whatever cause (covid or otherwise) so they may as well live life to the fullest within that time. It’s difficult to allow that at the national level because of pressures on the NHS, pressures on others who are trying to avoid infection etc. But I can understand why an individual older person may take that view. 

I was wondering why my nan has got bang on the smack recently (didn't want to be impolite and ask though - so ta for clearing that one up),

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So now thanks to the ridiculous pressure because of the Christmas relaxations I'm in the brilliant position of having to go and stay with my girlfriend's parents, while refusing to see my own family on principle. Because they're only worried about fines and not the virus it seems - that's the only reason they wouldn't break the rules even for a socially distanced walk 

Despite the fact my dad is having my brother there, who lives with someone who works in an office. I'm still refusing. It's completely wrong. 

I just want it to be January...

Edited by efcfanwirral
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Zoo Music Girl said:

Yeah I think the thing that is confusing is whether or not you can go to the pub with any members of your Christmas bubble if you are in tier 1. I read it as being not allowed. 

Me too. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...