Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

TBAs 2019


Tuna

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, LostHorizon said:

Surely if Diplo had pulled out, he would have announced it considering he was on the original poster? A few others already have, Santigold for example

Santigold has pulled out???

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Rose-Colored Boy said:

Surely not The Vaccines. Yuck. Pale Waves fit it perfectly though.

The Vaccines did Williams Green back in 2013 when they played the pyramid stage. It could be many bands, idles are already playing 2 gigs. Some like circa waves wouldn't be to bad. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Saint northover said:

The Vaccines did Williams Green back in 2013 when they played the pyramid stage. It could be many bands, idles are already playing 2 gigs. Some like circa waves wouldn't be to bad. 

CW did it last time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Silk City isn't a bad shout. Seems odd for Mark Ronson to be only appearing once on the lineup and in Stonebridge of all places. Would fit with Diplo being on the poster and still having Glasto in his schedule. Not sure which slot they would fit into though. Both huge names respectively but as Silk City they've only released a few tracks as far as i'm aware.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the saturday night JP TBA is due to a dropout (Diplo) then surely Doves will be absolutely festival ready for a glorious return..?? (Bearded Theory at the weekend and 4 further gigs before Glastonbury - culminating with Eden Sessions 0n the 23rd..). It would be downright rude not to pick up the phone to them...

Would be distressed by this (clash with Hot Chip) however and much rather the afternoon Park slot, as although it would balls up the Lizzo/Sigrid/Jungle enjoyment, i could just camp at The Park and give my knees a well earned break. A run of Doves, Kurt Vile, Kate Tempest, Hot Chip is none too shabby and followed up by The Lottery Winners in the Rabbit Hole is a pretty golden saturday night.. ? ***

 

 

*** Note : Doves wont play and i will be back and forth, get too pissed and forget where i am supposed to be next.. feckin planning pah!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, rubick said:

Orbital for the JPT TBC on the Saturday?

Would be an awful clash with the Chems of course. 

Please don't let it be Orbital in the JPT on the Saturday!!! I mean, they would be amazing, but this would just add to the absolute car-crash of the Saturday night clash-fest.  I have already got to decide between:

  • The Killers
  • The Chemical Brothers
  • Hot Chip
  • Hawkwind
  • The Damned
  • Wu Tang Clan
  • Detective Pikachu on the Pilton Palais

The humanity!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Abbathehorse said:

Please don't let it be Orbital in the JPT on the Saturday!!! I mean, they would be amazing, but this would just add to the absolute car-crash of the Saturday night clash-fest.  I have already got to decide between:

  • The Killers
  • The Chemical Brothers
  • Hot Chip
  • Hawkwind
  • The Damned
  • Wu Tang Clan
  • Detective Pikachu on the Pilton Palais

The humanity!

I reckon we'll decide between Chems/Wu-Tang/Hawkwind on the day. It's never easy, is it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Supernintendo Chalmers said:

Unfortunately it's usually someone too decent and you can't get anywhere near!

What time would you need to get there to get in the tent and is it usually announced prior to the festival? 

Edited by foolee
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...