Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

2019 Headliners


rzwodezwo

Recommended Posts

19 hours ago, stuartbert two hats said:

I call bullshit on this setlist business.  I knew he'd be shit and boring within a month of him being announced. 

 

And he was.

Good to see you went in with an open mind!

16 hours ago, CaledonianGonzo said:

I still dunno what he could have opened with other than Badlands. If noone knew or liked that he was fucked from the get go, regardless of what followed.  A field full of people who only wanted to hear Born In The USA isn't going to give much of a fiddlers even if he had played Backstreets and Rosalita.

Well he opened with Coma Girl. Which was odd. Could've opened with USA on the 12 string. Still the best opener I've seen him do. He played My Lucky Day, Outlaw Pete, Working on a Dream, Seeds and Johnny 99 early. Badlands a decent choice is followed up though yeah.

However not playing Rosie, Backstreets, Jungleland, USA, Atlantic City, Racing etc was mental.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, CaledonianGonzo said:

This doesn't chime what I heard about Neil Young in Hyde Park.  Didn't he alienate just about the whole crowd early doors with a 25 minute long version of something off of Are You Passionate?

Reminds me of when we saw him at Newcastle Arena a few years back. 

He seemed to go into a bit of a jazz fusion jam , we were on the floor but we saw a guy get up from the lower seats and shout " Rubbish " which everyone heard .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, Hugh Jass said:

I wandered off after 20 minutes.

I was with a bunch of folks, pretty sure I drifted off somewhere a bit more fun when he was talking about a song for coal miners a century or two back?  (my hazy memory could have exaggerated this).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Zoo Music Girl said:

My point was really that I didn't know half of what Young played at Hyde Park and thought it was fucking ace. So it's possible to enjoy a set without knowing the back catalogue intimately, but for me that wasn't possible with Bruce.

Same here. When he played last Sunday he had a 90 minute set, and it flew by. Only played about 4 hits out of about 15 songs and the crowd was loving every second of it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When I saw Neil with Promise Of The Real in Leeds a couple of years ago they pretty much just banged out hit after hit. Granted they were longer than usual with about 5 mins of jam session injected into each song, but it was never w*nkey and pretty much the whole crowd seemed to love it. He could've quite easily have done that same set on the Pyramid to a partisan crowd and had it broadcast on TV and pleased all comers.

Edited by GETOFFAMYLAWN
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, GETOFFAMYLAWN said:

When I saw Neil with Promise Of The Real in Leeds a couple of years ago they pretty much just banged out hit after hit. Granted they were longer than usual with about 5 mins of jam session injected into each song, but it was never w*nkey and pretty much the whole crowd seemed to love it. He could've quite easily have done that same set on the Pyramid to a partisan crowd and had it broadcast on TV and pleased all comers.

Aye, that was a cracking night.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, DownboundTrain52 said:

Aye, that was a cracking night.

Reckon when Marling walked off stage after bringing the house down she was like "beat that, ye auld goat", so Shakey's like "alright then".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, GETOFFAMYLAWN said:

When I saw Neil with Promise Of The Real in Leeds a couple of years ago they pretty much just banged out hit after hit. Granted they were longer than usual with about 5 mins of jam session injected into each song, but it was never w*nkey and pretty much the whole crowd seemed to love it. He could've quite easily have done that same set on the Pyramid to a partisan crowd and had it broadcast on TV and pleased all comers.

A lot of people just wanted Heart of Gold and Old Man for 2 hours. 

The last Crazy Horse tour got lots of complaints because he played harder rockier songs that were long. ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CaledonianGonzo said:

The audience in Glasgow was definitely split at the Crazy Horse gig 5 years back.  A half hour long version of Walk Like A Giant sorted out the true believers from the fairweather fans.

Especially the last 10 minutes - which consisted of Arc type noise and lots of litter blown across the stage iirc 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Xeph1995 said:

Id absloutely love to see QOTSA headline, I really think they are good enough and big enough. They also put on a killer show. I doubt its gunna happen next year but i hope so soon. 

They'll stick around headlining UK fests for a while and likely aren't expensive so I envision it happening eventually.

If there was a festival on this year I think they'd have headlined, if only cos of a lack of other touring headline options. Probably wouldn't have been one for the ages though, seeing as most would agree that the album was a step down and the live shows were going through the motions a bit, for whatever reason, this time around.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Xeph1995 said:

Id absloutely love to see QOTSA headline, I really think they are good enough and big enough. They also put on a killer show. I doubt its gunna happen next year but i hope so soon. 

I could absolutely see this being a pyramid stage moment. 

I was there and loved it to the core. My favourite was when Josh saw someone in the crowd dressed as spiderman and he just stopped singing and said "Bring me spiderman." and had the guy crowd-surf to the main stage.

But as much as I love them and as much as I enjoyed their performance on both occasions I saw them, it just didn't feel as big as when Gorillaz came on stage later that night as the headline act. (Despite my knowing properly like three Gorillaz songs then.) You couldn't even say QOTSA were coheadlining. Extremely entertaining, musically brilliant, but for some reason not a headline feel to them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Xeph1995 said:

Id absloutely love to see QOTSA headline, I really think they are good enough and big enough. They also put on a killer show. I doubt its gunna happen next year but i hope so soon. 

I could absolutely see this being a pyramid stage moment. 

 

 

They were light years behind depeche Mode and NIN at Mad Cool. There are far better bands out there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...