Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

2019 Headliners


rzwodezwo

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, uscore said:

Liam also seems quite "in" with Glastonbury.  He did the Pilton party this year. 

I didn't really enjoy his set last year, but I would also be surprised if he got less than the pyramid sub.

 

It would be funny if he was subbing Noel though.

Could you just imagine the onstage rant knowing Noel was coming on after, be worth seeing him for that alone 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think as things stand it's worth even contemplating Noel being above Liam on the bill.

Popularity for Liam performing solo has never been higher.

Admittedly folks are only really going to watch the Oasis songs but the ones he drops are crowd pleasers whereas Noel's are more for the chair brigade.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I used to love Noel but he comes across as a right tit these days, spends the majority of his gigs winding up the crowd. He will claim he's just having "banter" with them but just made him look like a tit. His brother is no better though but at least he's honest about it :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, mufcok said:

No chance are The Cure agreeing to take any other slot apart from Pyramid headliner

Yup. Robert Smith has made it very clear  in interviews they won't play less than 2 hours and that they won't do anything other than headline gigs/festivals. 

 

Tbf to them, I understand. They been around for decades and feel they've earnt the right to those terms. Whether they get a crowd or not is the bookers problem, not there's. 

Edited by zahidf
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Hugh Jass said:

That seems to be the current thinking, however a lot of us suspect that one of those is off. My suspicion is that AM is wrong.

I'm hoping AM is wrong. Can't put my finger on why but it just feels wrong.  Although I've got the same issue with AM as I did with White Stripes, just feel like it's all a bit emperor's new clothes.

Preparing to be shouted down in 5....4....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Quark said:

I'm hoping AM is wrong. Can't put my finger on why but it just feels wrong.  Although I've got the same issue with AM as I did with White Stripes, just feel like it's all a bit emperor's new clothes.

Preparing to be shouted down in 5....4....

I don't like them either, always found them exceedingly dull.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Quark said:

I'm hoping AM is wrong. Can't put my finger on why but it just feels wrong.  Although I've got the same issue with AM as I did with White Stripes, just feel like it's all a bit emperor's new clothes.

Preparing to be shouted down in 5....4....

Not 2 bands I'd expect to be lumped together, feels like you just wanted to let everyone know you don't like The White Stripes ahah.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Quark said:

I'm hoping AM is wrong. Can't put my finger on why but it just feels wrong.  Although I've got the same issue with AM as I did with White Stripes, just feel like it's all a bit emperor's new clothes.

Preparing to be shouted down in 5....4....

I like AMs, I just don’t think they’ll be there next year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, priest17 said:

Not 2 bands I'd expect to be lumped together, feels like you just wanted to let everyone know you don't like The White Stripes ahah.

An opportunity presented itself :lol:

I didn't mind the Stripes in the same way I don't mind AM, but with both of them I just really really struggle to understand where the acclaim comes from. In that context they sit in the same weird little corner of my brain.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Artic Monkeys just seems a bit "done", doesn't it? 3 times in 12 years... I'd much prefer the Cure and altho they've also headlined before, it was nearly 30 years ago. If the AM are still around in 28 years they have my complete backing to do it again. Seems as if they're doing over 20 headline slots or whatever NME said they're nailed on imo. I'm not a big BIG fan of them, but they could be worth an hour standing in the rain singing along to the Forest.

Why can't Glasto take a massive risk with someone? It's gonna sell out anyway, no one cares THAT much about the headliners do they? Apart from the fine folk on this board obvsiouly ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, MEGATRONICMEATWAGON said:



Why can't Glasto take a massive risk with someone? It's gonna sell out anyway, no one cares THAT much about the headliners do they? Apart from the fine folk on this board obvsiouly ?

They did take a risk on a headliner,  they got a huge ton of negative comments from everyone, Emily got death threats and another act they have been chasing for years and probably one of their biggest ever bookings pulled out of the festival that year.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Divein said:

They did take a risk on a headliner,  they got a huge ton of negative comments from everyone, Emily got death threats and another act they have been chasing for years and probably one of their biggest ever bookings pulled out of the festival that year.

 

Did she actually get death threats for booking him? I knew she got berated for it but didn't know people were being as moronic as that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd also probably class Adele as a risk. Even if she was the biggest possible booking they could have done at the time- she hadn't done a festival before and could easily have dropped out leaving them right in it. They could have pushed Tame Impala/Beck or Foals up though but again they would have been a risk. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You could then argue elton John would be a risk at the rate he cancels shows, they would surely need a strong sub to step up. Listening to just the beginning of that mccartney video a few pages back, I still don't understand the clamour for him to play. Not being ageist here, saw the stones this summer and they were fabulous, and look like they enjoy playing still - not just going through the motions. 

Have 2 safe crowd pleasers and give one not so safe or bump someone up. I know Royal Blood have lost a lot of love on this board for some reason, but personally thought their set the best I saw 2017, another album maybe and stick 'em on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MEGATRONICMEATWAGON said:

Artic Monkeys just seems a bit "done", doesn't it? 3 times in 12 years... I'd much prefer the Cure and altho they've also headlined before, it was nearly 30 years ago. If the AM are still around in 28 years they have my complete backing to do it again. Seems as if they're doing over 20 headline slots or whatever NME said they're nailed on imo. I'm not a big BIG fan of them, but they could be worth an hour standing in the rain singing along to the Forest.

Why can't Glasto take a massive risk with someone? It's gonna sell out anyway, no one cares THAT much about the headliners do they? Apart from the fine folk on this board obvsiouly ?

Get Morrissey in as back up for Elton. What could possibly go wrong??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • sub yes I could see but I don't think they get 1hr 15, a headliner starting at 18:15 though is unlikely. Even the recent co-headlines that have had like 1hr 15 then a 1hr 30 after were on 8pm or just before, you are trailing behind more than 1.5 hours then. In that scenario some 3rd down bands are only starting at 18:15 and some haven't lol. I agree they won't not book them due to this but it won't be 6 headliners. It would be 5 headliners and you wouldn't want to see 5 headliners booked but Biffy were to not be thouhgt of as an option for one. Wolf Alice on the other hand could sub no bother and you'd think nothing of it. I'm not so sure Biffy would get headline though after the festival choice in Kendal this year.
    • Definitely. UKIP also used Merkel welcoming 1 million Afgans to Europe in 2015 during the brexit vote.   Politicians in other countries within the EU know the are going to lose voters to parties to the right of them over stuff like this and they've no control over it.
    • I think it will very much vary on who there is to book who they know will sell out a day.    They’ve co-headline and full headline stuff in future, there no reason at all they won’t do it again, even if it means cutting someone’s set by 15 mins or having a band less in a big bands day…   They’re not going to not book Foo fighters and instead get the equivalent of Florence and C&S just to not have a band do a big set…   …unless of course they think it will make them more money…
    • Maybe some right wing leaders like Meloni are just playing to their base, like Reform have been here talking about them ending up at Calais.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...