Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Glastocam!


pauladam

Recommended Posts

20 minutes ago, squirrelarmy said:

The Spider coming back is a known fact. That’s not being disputed. 
 

The mystery is what is happening with the crane. 
 

There are rumours of an outlandish plan which apparently is too crazy even for this forum. 
 

Glastonbury Festivals own a crane. If they’re unable to erect it I’m certain they will repurpose it for some other use. No idea what though which is one of the reasons we’re watching the cam! 

Naaah, it’s off to the scrappy! 😂

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That'd be a huuuuge screen

Thinking about it I don't know how I feel about bigger screens, reckon they were probably the perfect size before relative to the stage. Could certainly see what was going on clearly from right at the back. Wouldn't want them detracting from the pyramid too much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Neville Street said:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/events/glastonbury/webcam

Is this the link we are all using? I had one to a “panodata” site saved, but it seems to send me to this place now. Is there a higher definition version that I should now be using as an advanced Glastocam forum user?

Here's another option:

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Deaf Nobby Burton said:

Also what’s going on top right on the path entrance?

looks like they are laying track on my running route.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, leath02 said:

Although - these towers do look thinner... And there's some bigger ones which look like the towers from 2019 on the floor there too... So maybe this isn't what it appears to be

I'm also analysing the same images to get an idea of scale. Going back to my screenshot the section further from camera is bigger than the stuff currently being assembled.

perspective.png.82040aaa3f4127b16026f38e6ca05146.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, leath02 said:

Although - these towers do look thinner... And there's some bigger ones which look like the towers from 2019 on the floor there too... So maybe this isn't what it appears to be

I think they look thinner to start once they're up before the screen, lights and pa is hung off them

https://www.freeyourfeeds.com/glastocam.php?gdate=19-06-2019+16%3A00

But then again the ones on the floor now don't look tall enough...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, broken monkey said:

For reference, here's the screen rigging just before being erected in 2019 (June 18th). It does seem very early to be putting these together.

image.thumb.png.ef1f04c9c63f7f7affa476d2f150e185.png

The overall size doesn't look that different ether.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Deaf Nobby Burton said:

It’s logical that the screens change over time, as it’s not like the company that supply aren’t going to be consistently investing in the latest technology otherwise that would be commercial suicide.

The technology shouldn't really be relevant to this conversation - these days, large outdoor displays structured in such a way that screens can be assembled to any size or aspect ratio desired - they basically consist of dozens or hundreds of individual modules joined together to create whatever display is needed.

That's why you often see a square or two flickering or going off, while the rest of the screen is fine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, incident said:

The technology shouldn't really be relevant to this conversation - these days, large outdoor displays structured in such a way that screens can be assembled to any size or aspect ratio desired - they basically consist of dozens or hundreds of individual modules joined together to create whatever display is needed.

That's why you often see a square or two flickering or going off, while the rest of the screen is fine.

Not really, technology evolves all the time, the new Led ones seen at places like Reading last year are a step up in technology compared to what Glastonbury have had to date, they’re different screens. The companies supplying Glastonbury aren’t exactly not going to move with the times and keep upgrading their tech too as they’ll go bust, eventually the older stuff will be obsolete as nobody will want it. 

Edited by Deaf Nobby Burton
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Deaf Nobby Burton said:

Not really, technology evolves all the time, the new Led ones seen at places like Reading last year are a step up in technology compared to what Glastonbury have had to date, they’re different screens. The companies supplying Glastonbury aren’t exactly not going to move with the times and keep upgrading their tech too as they’ll go bust, eventually the older stuff will be obsolete as nobody will want it. 

My point is that as the systems are almost all entirely modular, the underlying technology being supplied isn't relevant. This applies regardless of whether it's old or new. The main difference that new technology brings is less weight and more flexibility, allowing for things that would have been impractical in the past (such as the screens you mention at Reading). A company supplying display screens can build a screen to whatever size or shape the customer (GFL) wants.

Take a look at this video to see how they're put together. The basic way it works is approximately the same regardless of whether it's this, a Pyramid Screen from 15 years ago, or the Reading screens from last year - the only core difference is the respective scale..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, incident said:

My point is that as the systems are almost all entirely modular, the underlying technology being supplied isn't relevant. This applies regardless of whether it's old or new. The main difference that new technology brings is less weight and more flexibility, allowing for things that would have been impractical in the past (such as the screens you mention at Reading). A company supplying display screens can build a screen to whatever size or shape the customer (GFL) wants.

Take a look at this video to see how they're put together. The basic way it works is approximately the same regardless of whether it's this, a Pyramid Screen from 15 years ago, or the Reading screens from last year - the only core difference is the respective scale..

I think the point is that improved technology may well have brought us to a place where we're getting different sized/shaped screens this year - so the tech is relevant to looking at the various bits of rigging on the ground on a webcam.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Claire0406 said:

Fence build starts Tuesday 🙂 my partner is going Monday and his team will begin it Tuesday morning x 

Ah thanks for clarification. Wonder if its just some remedial works. I had to check to see if the fence goes up that high and seems to have got further back as years gone on!  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • 👍 plus they brought their own screens 📺 either side of the stage.
    • Production was the only thing that could even explain why she would back out. Like they had sorted out the financials and she was fine with it and then a production meeting happened. It all fell apart. It was very clear that she was not going to compromise her show one bit and then that show in Brazil pretty much confirmed it. There was like one element they couldnt pull off outdoors, but it was negligible since the rest was a carbon copy of the tour she had been on. Glasto is not willing to make any bold changes on the Pyramid stage so then theyre kinda stuck in terms of what some acts want/demand. I think the easiest solution to that is putting her on Friday. You deal with the changes for one night and then re configure for the rest of the weekend. In 24 they were fortunate to have had Dua and Coldplay on Fri and Sat so they could both use the b stage. But I think it was removed for Sunday?     I saw a random rag article earlier that said Olivia Dean turned down Glasto BECAUSE her ex ( not even confirmed dating ) Harry Styles was playing the fest. hahahaha
    • No argument that he’s bigger than ever, I just have no enthusiasm for it.
    • Keep in mind those crowds were full of teenagers. Glasto aint full of teenagers. Theres no way she could demand headline and get it because they got other acts to give the slot to who deserve it with a bigger catalog. Reading/Leeds would headline her cause its still LN.  If the fest was struggling its Other headline. But a 3rd down Pyramid is likely the landing spot. Itll go down like the Camila Cabello performance pretty much.
    • Norwich times if anyone is interested 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...