Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎


Acid_Haze

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 37.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • FloorFiller

    1190

  • Rose-Colored Boy

    1060

  • Matt42

    1040

  • eFestivals

    1008

I've been very high in my time but I've never said I "want the coons out". Forgiving someone for being openly racist because they've had some cocaine is a more than questionable stance.

In what way can the statement "Kanye West is critically acclaimed" be proven better than posting some critical acclaim?

A lot of stupidity and attitudes I don't like in this thread tonight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've got a lot of time for Swifty but she's no headliner. Maybe at t4 on the beach.

T4OTB went under four years ago sadly or I'd be there in a heartbeat :(

EDIT: actually just found out that the headliners for the last two years it was held were Rizzle Kicks and N-Dubz so no, no I would not.

Edited by Zac Quinn
Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Acts X & Y are only commercially successful!"

*Provides proof to the contrary*

"Critical acclaim means nothing! Critics are stupid, and they have cooties."

Its Kanye/T Swizle fans who seem rather obsessed with critical acclaim and sales, just don't seem to like it being compared to Bieber. (But the festival should be open to any genre/acts as long as Pitchfork approved ;))

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Swift and West acclaimed. Hahaha

Please demonstrate how I got that wrong. Yeezus was hugely critically acclaimed on its release, and Swift has also been critically praised. Neither may be your cup of tea, but you're making things up to pretend that they haven't both found critical acclaim.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its Kanye/T Swizle fans who seem rather obsessed with critical acclaim and sales, just don't seem to like it being compared to Bieber.

Why would you compare either to Beiber, of all people? Doing so just makes you look stupid. I'm not at all 'obsessed' with critical acclaim - I've mentioned it a grand total of one time, then defended the assertion when somebody answered to suggest I'd got it wrong (I didn't).

Your only tenuous link is that Beiber is popular, but that's not the point I made and even if it was, it strikes me as obvious that there is a giant leap in quality between him and Kanye/Swift. You might not think so and that's fine, I couldn't care less, but I'll disagree that you can conflate any two artists who are popular simply on the basis of their popularity. If that's your argument, you could say the same for literally any act that's popular, including anyone you like who falls into that category too.

Edited by kalifire
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Having said all that, I'll concede that we're now discussing who is better according to music journos none of us probably have much time for - Kanye West or Justin Bieber. And for that I'm sorry. I guess it's time to admit it. This thread has broken me. I am a broken man.

An announcement is my only cure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah i was going to wade in on this arguement to support the critical acclaim of TS and, particularly, Kanye but most of it's already all been said. I don't particularly Iike either of them but kanye's albums regularly top best of the year critic lists (and polls of critics lists) over artists who most would describe as hugely critically acclaimed. Comparing them to bieber on this point is ridiculous.

Yes critical acclaim means little but to prove a point you can argue the same about popularity (One Direction), sales (Mumfords), high grossing tours (Bon Jovi), regular headline slots at other fests (Kasabian), history with Glastonbury (Florence) etc. etc.

The only thing many people really care about a headliner is whether they fit with their own taste - which is entirely subjective.

Edited by DJL
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure if it's been mentioned at all in the last two days, but this month's copy of Mojo has a pretty extensive interview with Blur, and one of the first thing Damon talks about is how that Gorillaz set is one of his biggest musical regrets:

"Why didn't I communicate with the audience when I played Glastonbury with Gorillaz? Why didn't I communicate with the audience, at all? I regret that because it would have been a different outcome if I had."

Sounds like Damon may feel he has a bit of unfinished business with Glastonbury headline slots...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since reading Kanye and Swift were announced (and rumoured). I have listened to quite a few of their tunes.

Kanye - isn't quite what I thought he was. His style isn't to my particular taste, but I can see why people like him. Apparently he is the producer for his tunes and it's on that score I give him top marks. Lyrically he doesn't quite hit the spot for me (that often, because on occaision he does) - I'm not a fan of his voice either, but production wise I think his tunes are often great. If there was less Kanye in them, I'd really like them (that is is a backhanded compliment, but Im trying to say he is great producer!).

He is though far better than I gave him previous credit for. I can see why he gets the acclaim.

Swift - I'm sorry, but I don't see what elevates her above Katy Perry, Christina Aguilera, Justin Timberlake, One Direction or any other modern generic pop act. I understand why if you like Katy Perry etc that you would like her, but there is a hipster following for her that I don't understand. If she is critically acclaimed, I cannot understand why.

Edited by FuzzyDunlop
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can forgive Albarn for his lack of crowd interaction that night due to the fact that he was clearly trying to be part of the band, not the big star and their gigs have a very strong formula based very much around that. It did kill the atmosphere though, along with the false start, several long dark pauses between tracks and a crowd that just didn't care for what they were seeing. I really went there hoping for something special, but even as a fan who loved the current album the show was built around I walked away disappointed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Swift - I'm sorry, but I don't see what elevates her above Katy Perry, Christina Aguilera, Justin Timberlake, One Direction or any other modern generic pop act. I understand why if you like Katy Perry etc that you would like her, but there is a hipster following for her that I don't understand. If she is critically acclaimed, I cannot understand why.

This. At first I thought that people were just being ironic when they said they liked Taylor Swift, as it appears to be music marketed at people who have to go gigs with their parents. It sounds (to me) like all the other manufactured pap pop out there that meaninglessly passes me by on the rare occasion I'd be somewhere Radio 1 plays. When it dawned on me in this thread that people were serious I just couldn't understand why. I still don't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure if it's been mentioned at all in the last two days, but this month's copy of Mojo has a pretty extensive interview with Blur, and one of the first thing Damon talks about is how that Gorillaz set is one of his biggest musical regrets:

"Why didn't I communicate with the audience when I played Glastonbury with Gorillaz? Why didn't I communicate with the audience, at all? I regret that because it would have been a different outcome if I had."

Sounds like Damon may feel he has a bit of unfinished business with Glastonbury headline slots...

I really do hope they get another chance when their next album comes out. I saw them at the O2 Arena later in the year and they were phenomenal, completely different to the Glastonbury set.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Despite knowing the Diner had announced yesterday... I woke up, saw all of the red confirmations on the efestivals lineup page, and for a split second thought the lineup had come out. Skipped a beat.

It's getting desperate!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can forgive Albarn for his lack of crowd interaction that night due to the fact that he was clearly trying to be part of the band, not the big star and their gigs have a very strong formula based very much around that. It did kill the atmosphere though, along with the false start, several long dark pauses between tracks and a crowd that just didn't care for what they were seeing. I really went there hoping for something special, but even as a fan who loved the current album the show was built around I walked away disappointed.

I heard the flaming lips set was being played in a monitor just off stage on the pyramid and he kept getting distracted by it, realising that he was being blown away by a sensational set.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Swift - I'm sorry, but I don't see what elevates her above Katy Perry, Christina Aguilera, Justin Timberlake, One Direction or any other modern generic pop act. I understand why if you like Katy Perry etc that you would like her, but there is a hipster following for her that I don't understand. If she is critically acclaimed, I cannot understand why.

This, totally this, been wanting to say something like this for ages on here when she was being seriously talked about, but didnt know how to say it without being offensive, so I just said nothing. But you've put it beautifully. I honestly cant understand why she was even being discussed as a headliner.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's a shame that by all accounts that Gorillaz had a duff set at Glastonbury. They had a really tough task in filling in for U2. I wasn't there, but I saw them a few weeks later at Benicassim and loved their performance - maybe it just didn't click that night at Glasto? And perhaps the crowd I saw them in were a bit more receptive to their music.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes the crowd were shite, chatting throughout.

Was fab to see Lou reed live though and the visuals were great

The crowd started off really happy for that, If i remember right they were subbed by Vampire Weekend, Snoop and Dizzee Rascal, who wouldn't be upbeat after that?

The false start definitely didn't help, relying on guest appearances too heavily (did half the crowd know who Mark E was?) and saving your best 2 songs for last were all bad ideas too. A bit of Feel Good Inc or CLint Eastwood earlier on would have helped. I think the bit where most people around me cleared off was the bit when the people came out to play bongos and traditional instruments.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Alkaline Trio 90 Barrington Levy 80 Basement Jaxx 120 Billy Bragg 100 Billy Ocean 100 The Black Keys 50 Carl Cox 105  Chase & Status 120 Chelsea Wolfe 75  CMAT 135  Confidence Man 150 MAX David Byrne 150 MAX Disclosure 40  Everything Everything 120 (+5)  Faithless 110 Fatboy Slim 100 Four Tet 130 Garbage 100 GOAT 105 Greentea Peng 120 Happy Mondays 80  Hollie Cook 90 Jorja Smith 100 José González 100 Joy Crookes 120 Judas Priest 70 Kasabian 30 Kneecap 120  Levellers 85 Linkin Park 90 Lorde 120 Madness 65  The Maccabees 110  Neck Deep 135 Nile Rodgers & Chic 100 Overmono 90 The Prodigy 145 Pulp 150 MAX RAYE 100 Richard Ashcroft 100 Say She She 75 Scissor Sisters 120 Self Esteem 120 Skunk Anansie 100 Stereolab 110  The Streets 110 Super Furry Animals 110 Thundercat 90 Tyler, the Creator 50 Underworld 125  Wet Leg 90 Wilco 105  The Wombats 55 (-5) Wolf Alice 150 MAX
    • A win is a win but it was a very poor game with only 4 shots on target in the whole game. Scotland obviously handed a massive bonus with Brazil and Morocco drawing but I don't think either of them will be too worried. 
    • Word of advice, your work-life energy balance should be 60% energy for work and 40% energy for life. If you're drained after a day's work, that is something you should strongly look into. Especially if it is solely due to work.
    • Well that was a game completely lacking in quality. I think Scotland didn’t deserve to win and were lucky Haiti couldn’t hit a barn door.   However if your Scotland you just take the win and run. It may be enough to get to the last 32. I hope it’s just a case of nerves and now they have points on the board they will show more in the next few games. Better to play poorly and win, then play well and lose!
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...