Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎


Acid_Haze

Recommended Posts

On a a personal level, I've still to hear him play Incident live, I need to satisfy that goal!!

I went on holiday to Rome in '13 in part to see his show there. We got a run of Kitty's Back, Incident > Roaslita, NYC Serenade. The best 45 minutes of live music I've ever witnessed.

In 12 shows, still never had Backstreets, and it's one of my absolute favourites.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 37.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • FloorFiller

    1190

  • Rose-Colored Boy

    1060

  • Matt42

    1040

  • eFestivals

    1008

100%

I actually don't know anyone personally under the age of 25 that is either a fan of Prince or knows more than 4-5 songs. Of course they out there, but they're a dwindling minority. Only Madonna is on course to rivalling Princes lack of modern day relevance IMO.

Still. I've heard his shows are entertaining...

At the same time, I know people around my age (late teens/early 20s) who believed that the Ramones were 'just a brand' because they were on one of their t-shirts. I know people who wouldn't know anything by Led Zep. Heck, my flatmates have no idea who the Smiths are/were. So where do you draw the line?

Could none of those headline because the under 25s aren't huge fans? Okay, obviously not the Ramones but you get what I mean ;)

'I Wanna Be Adored'

'Elephant Stone'

'Ten Storey Love Song'

'Standing Here'

'Going Down'

'Shoot You Down'

'Fools Gold'

'Something's Burning'

'Waterfall'

'Don't Stop'

'She Bangs the Drums'

'Love Spreads'

'This Is the One'

'Made Of Stone'

'Breaking Into Heaven'

'I Am The Resurrection'

Prince couldnt top that.

Given that you earlier admitted that you don't actually know most Prince songs, how would you know? :lol: I like both the Roses and Prince and they'd both have the hits, both have some songs which wouldn't go down so well.

For example, I've bolded 10 songs in that Roses setlist which wouldn't be sing-a-longs. 50% at least wouldn't know any of them.

Edited by GlastoSimon
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry to hear your news and hope you have support around you.

Hope you get to see Taylor Swift also.

Didn't you say before that you got injured during last years Glastonbury? Anyway sounds like you deserve a really good Glastonbury this year

Cheers. Lots of support from the family.I had a really nasty accident last year on Friday night and broke my upper arm. I spent most of Saturday in a sling with Brufen to numb the pain and ended up going to bed as Metallica started as I was frightened of crowds. The wife had to come and rescue me Sunday morning to drive the camper home. Frigging nightmare. Took me six months to get over it but that's another story.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

'I Wanna Be Adored'

'Elephant Stone'

'Ten Storey Love Song'

'Standing Here'

'Going Down'

'Shoot You Down'

'Fools Gold'

'Something's Burning'

'Waterfall'

'Don't Stop'

'She Bangs the Drums'

'Love Spreads'

'This Is the One'

'Made Of Stone'

'Breaking Into Heaven'

'I Am The Resurrection'

Prince couldnt top that.

He certainly could. Maybe not for a certain number of people who grew up on those songs, but for a casual Pyramid goer & the BBC audience Prince would wipe the floor with it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At the same time, I know people around my age (late teens/early 20s) who believed that the Ramones were 'just a brand' because they were on one of their t-shirts. I know people who wouldn't know anything by Led Zep. Heck, my flatmates have no idea who the Smiths are/were. So where do you draw the line?

Could none of those headline because the under 25s aren't huge fans? Okay, obviously not the Ramones but you get what I mean ;)

Given that you earlier admitted that you don't actually know most Prince songs, how would you know? :lol: I like both the Roses and Prince and they'd both have the hits, both have some songs which wouldn't go down so well.

For example, I've bolded 10 songs in that Roses setlist which wouldn't be sing-a-longs. 50% at least wouldn't know any of them.

I dont understand. Are you sayin I wanna be adored isnt a sing along? or This is the one isnt?

are the highlighted ones not sing a longs?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unless you're massively into The Stone Roses and Prince or you've not really listened to either it's pretty hard to gauge

That would be me. I was around when both were at their peaks so feel fairly qualified to answer.

Going off the songs listed, I know way more Prince songs than Stone Roses ones.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dont understand. Are you sayin I wanna be adored isnt a sing along? or This is the one isnt?

are the highlighted ones not sing a longs?

Sorry, I screwed up with the bolding a bit there :lol:

'I Wanna Be Adored'

'Elephant Stone'

'Ten Storey Love Song'

'Standing Here'

'Going Down'

'Shoot You Down'

'Fools Gold'

'Something's Burning'

'Waterfall'

'Don't Stop'

'She Bangs the Drums'

'Love Spreads'

'This Is the One'

'Made Of Stone'

'Breaking Into Heaven'

'I Am The Resurrection'

That should make more sense!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

'I Wanna Be Adored'

'Elephant Stone'

'Ten Storey Love Song'

'Standing Here'

'Going Down'

'Shoot You Down'

'Fools Gold'

'Something's Burning'

'Waterfall'

'Don't Stop'

'She Bangs the Drums'

'Love Spreads'

'This Is the One'

'Made Of Stone'

'Breaking Into Heaven'

'I Am The Resurrection'

Prince couldnt top that.

he could top it by him singing and not ian brown

Link to comment
Share on other sites

see i thought this too but was shot down when suggesting it not long ago. i'd say Prince has far more recognisable songs than the Roses do - his mammoth back catalogue vs their two albums alone ensures that

Have to agree. Prince has more songs that once they start playing people will know (they might not know the names of the song but the tune is recognisable). Whereas with the roses, if they know the song it's more likely they will know it's title. Edited by mjsell
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry, I screwed up with the bolding a bit there :lol:

'I Wanna Be Adored'

'Elephant Stone''

Ten Storey Love Song'

'Standing Here'

'Going Down'

'Shoot You Down'

'Fools Gold'

'Something's Burning'

'Waterfall'

'Don't Stop'

'She Bangs the Drums'

'Love Spreads'

'This Is the One'

'Made Of Stone'

'Breaking Into Heaven'

'I Am The Resurrection'

That should make more sense!

I Disagree im afraid, i think that is more accurate ^ Oviously if your a fan like me, you'd know em all. but anything of the debut album bar Dont Stop would be a sing a long!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

I Wanna Be Your Lover

Controversy

When Doves Cry

I Would Die 4 U

Little Red Corvette

Raspberry Beret

Alphabet St

Sign o' The times

U got the Look

The Most Beautiful Girl in the World

Let's go crazy

Nothing Compares 2 U

and let's face it shall we? With true honesty? That's a list of shit songs.

And they're bad enough as the originals, so quite why anyone would want to hear bad metal versions of them I've no idea.

You're more than welcome to him. It says more about your ears than mine. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Saw Prince at Hop Farm with a friend who claimed to not know a single Prince song other than Nothing Compares 2 U (and even then, only because of the Sinead O'Connor version).

He spent most of the set turning to me and going "Oh, I do know this one!"

Is that a good thing? Basically saying its an artist he's heard loads but didnt like the song enough to actually check out who it was haha

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Prince couldnt top that.

Nonsense. If you are a fan of music you cannot simply dismiss one for the other - they are both great choices. But if you want a Sunday headliner that appeals to the majority then P.... wins hands down.

That would be me. I was around when both were at their peaks so feel fairly qualified to answer.

Going off the songs listed, I know way more Prince songs than Stone Roses ones.

This is true. Me too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

says a lot about what you know about heavy metal...

and guitarists

says the man who said it was impossible for Spri8nsteen to be duller than dishwater, even after he'd put in a duller-than-dishwater performance.

Remember tony, those posts of your still exist here, and I'll pull them out and prove you a bullshitter if you deny you said pretty much that. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Regarding sing-along-ability, it's not just knowing the songs, but having the lyrics burnt into your subconscious. I don't like either act and probably couldn't even sing a Stone Roses line, but I could do the choruses of Kiss and Raspberry Beret.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

and let's face it shall we? With true honesty? That's a list of shit songs.

And they're bad enough as the originals, so quite why anyone would want to hear bad metal versions of them I've no idea.

You're more than welcome to him. It says more about your ears than mine. :)

the fact that you think Prince would play metal versions of anything says quite a lot about your ears, in fairness.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He can sing though.

That only matters if you are watching the Sunday night headliner on the Beeb from your couch. In the fields its a whole different kettle of fish

If the Roses were to play the Sunday night Brown wouldn't have to open his mouth the singalong would be that epic............

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I went on holiday to Rome in '13 in part to see his show there. We got a run of Kitty's Back, Incident > Roaslita, NYC Serenade. The best 45 minutes of live music I've ever witnessed.

In 12 shows, still never had Backstreets, and it's one of my absolute favourites.

I got goosebumps just reading that. My favourite album of his, I'd give my left bollock to see him perform it live.

* lights cigar *

*shakes fist*

Cant play like John, and i bet his band cant play like Mani and Reni

Prince is a better guitar player than Squire imo, and thats coming from a bigger Roses fan than. Squire tries to hard with the Page stuff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...