Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Oasis


Guest

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, 09matthewsw said:

1,000,000 people spending upwards of £150 6 weeks (?) before T-day. I’m not suggesting Glastonbury won’t sale out but surely it’s gonna dent demand a little bit. 
 

Not gonna debate this but think this dwarfs the Eras tour on every metric you could think of 

 

it'll have practically zero effect on glastonbury sales

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Crazyfool01 said:

But not in the numbers that purchase actual tickets ? 

I’m not so familiar with the UK dates that Taylor did, was it more than Oasis have announced?

 

worth mentioning that their are reports that more dates will follow for Oasis 

 

talking on a UK scale here, not doubt that Taylor wipes the floor with Oasis in the states 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, 09matthewsw said:

Not gonna debate this but think this dwarfs the Eras tour on every metric you could think of 

 

Apart from ticket sales? 

She sold 650,000 tickets for her London shows alone. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, stuie said:

 

Apart from ticket sales? 

She sold 650,000 tickets for her London shows alone. 

This Oasis tour will be close to double that once the Wednesday Heaton Park and Wembley dates are inevitably confirmed 

 

1 minute ago, Crazyfool01 said:

Without looking I’d imagine Coldplay have done similar numbers last year maybe more … no impact either 

… they headlined? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the only effect it'll have after this announcement they're definitely not playing is removing a few people who would've only tried for Glastonbury to be at the first Oasis gig back. So back to wherever Glastonbury demand would be if Oasis weren't touring. 

Edited by efcfanwirral
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, 09matthewsw said:

This Oasis tour will be close to double that once the Wednesday Heaton Park and Wembley dates are inevitably confirmed

 

Yes, that's right... so probably about 1,000,000 when you include Cardiff, Liverpool, and Edinburgh.   So it's directly comparable, not dwarfed by Oasis 'on every metric', which was the point!   

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hope London gets someone decent as a replacement for Courteeners

 

Blossoms and Courteeners is exactly what you'd expect but my god its beyond boring

 

Courteeners probably aren't doing London as they'd get a smaller crowd than Blossoms on before them lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, itschris said:

i mentioned a couple of pages back that there is already eff all hotel rooms available for those dates

I have seen it claimed that hotels in some places where Oasis are playing have cancelled their hotel or Airbnb res and then tried to re-sell them for whopping mark-ups.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Watched There & Then on Prime the other day and was shocked how poor they sounded as a band. As a kid I probably didn’t take too much notice of their performances - just buzzing off their songs, but they never seemed to have been the tightest of acts.

Liams vocals on the other hand were phenomenal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, charlierc said:

I have seen it claimed that hotels in some places where Oasis are playing have cancelled their hotel or Airbnb res and then tried to re-sell them for whopping mark-ups.

The Gardens Hotel in Manchester cancelled my mates for exactly that

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Badlands said:

Watched There & Then on Prime the other day and was shocked how poor they sounded as a band. As a kid I probably didn’t take too much notice of their performances - just buzzing off their songs, but they never seemed to have been the tightest of acts.

Liams vocals on the other hand were phenomenal.

 

By the Sea & GMEX gigs are much better IMO.

 

GMEX is the best gig I saw from them. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, charlierc said:

I have seen it claimed that hotels in some places where Oasis are playing have cancelled their hotel or Airbnb res and then tried to re-sell them for whopping mark-ups.

 

5 minutes ago, Badlands said:

The Gardens Hotel in Manchester cancelled my mates for exactly that

Happened to us with the Maldron (the one in the news).

 

Not putting this on Twitter or anything, but if anyone is looking at Manchester and can't find hotels, airport ones are normal prices still. Its a very short train ride away and the trains are later to there than most other places 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, 09matthewsw said:

Not gonna debate this but think this dwarfs the Eras tour on every metric you could think of 

 

Except the metrics that involve actual, you know, numbers.

 

In the UK+Ireland, the Eras tour sold over 1.3 million tickets across 18 shows (and by most reckoning could have easily sold the same again).

 

Even assuming they add both of the expected extra dates in Manchester and Wembley - Oasis will max out at a shade under 1.16 million. Partly due to a lower average capacity, partly due to playing two fewer shows.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We booked loads on booking.com as I saw that somebody had a spreadsheet of the dates the night before the announcement.  My wife and I took a punt on the dates being correct and  booked as many as we could for both Wembley and Cardiff and was amazed as we got dirt cheap Premier Inn  at Cardiff Bay for £89 for a twin room

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, charlierc said:

I have seen it claimed that hotels in some places where Oasis are playing have cancelled their hotel or Airbnb res and then tried to re-sell them for whopping mark-ups.

 

Hotel in Manc is trying to cancel my mate's room, but he booked through booking.com so he is refusing to accept it (the hotel cannot unilaterally cancel after accepting). Booking.com will force the hotel to accommodate him or sort an alternative.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, grassman said:

Other than the ballot, which I have signed up for, is there another presale?  I've heard rumours of one, and have been on the mailing list since 1994 or thereabouts, so was hoping there might be something for loyal fans or whatever...

 

My mate got the loyal fans one. He randomly signed up to the new mailing list in April. 

 

You are only a loyal fan if you signed up to the new one..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, panasonic2011 said:

We booked loads on booking.com as I saw that somebody had a spreadsheet of the dates the night before the announcement.  My wife and I took a punt on the dates being correct and  booked as many as we could for both Wembley and Cardiff and was amazed as we got dirt cheap Premier Inn  at Cardiff Bay for £89 for a twin room

Right now on Expedia, cheapest I could find in Cardiff for the date of the first show within the city limits was £530. Yikes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, incident said:

 

Except the metrics that involve actual, you know, numbers.

 

In the UK+Ireland, the Eras tour sold over 1.3 million tickets across 18 shows (and by most reckoning could have easily sold the same again).

 

Even assuming they add both of the expected extra dates in Manchester and Wembley - Oasis will max out at a shade under 1.16 million. Partly due to a lower average capacity, partly due to playing two fewer shows.

I thought it was funny that the second eras show wasn’t added to Cardiff as I even saw a poster for it but it never went on sale. 
 

image.thumb.jpeg.390a54004537ebb18cebe0c7b6ed9e73.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...