Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

2025 Headliners


Guest

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, nikkic said:


As it stands I’d say….

 

Liv on lock.

 

They’re aiming for a big fish such as Stevie W or Rihanna.

 

One of Fender or Fred for the final slot, or both if they can’t reel the big fish.

 

Yup.

I actually believe Foos Fighters were back in the conversation as well due to wanting a big fish would could rule Stevie out but they are out too. I think one of BMTH or MCR has been pulled to replace at Reading

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, doogie said:

Looking at O-Rod's schedule, she doesn't seem to ever do 3 consecutive nights.  But she does sometimes do 2 consecutive nights in different places.

 

So it looks like Saturday or nothing.

 

Guts World Tour - Wikipedia

Does sometimes do 2 in a row? Literally had 6 shows in Los Angeles and they all had single day breaks in between sets of 2 shows. The productions for Bst and Glasto arent even an issue. You rehearse like its a festival. Somebody is out of their mind if being able to get to 2 events with absolutely zero distance is an issue here. You play BST, pack up whatever you have to and take it to Glasto overnight and she soundchecks in the morning. Whats the big ass deal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Suprefan said:

Does sometimes do 2 in a row? Literally had 6 shows in Los Angeles and they all had single day breaks in between sets of 2 shows. The productions for Bst and Glasto arent even an issue. You rehearse like its a festival. Somebody is out of their mind if being able to get to 2 events with absolutely zero distance is an issue here. You play BST, pack up whatever you have to and take it to Glasto overnight and she soundchecks in the morning. Whats the big ass deal.

Lucky you got the dates confused…

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Suprefan said:

Does sometimes do 2 in a row? Literally had 6 shows in Los Angeles and they all had single day breaks in between sets of 2 shows. The productions for Bst and Glasto arent even an issue. You rehearse like its a festival. Somebody is out of their mind if being able to get to 2 events with absolutely zero distance is an issue here. You play BST, pack up whatever you have to and take it to Glasto overnight and she soundchecks in the morning. Whats the big ass deal.

 

Oh she does 2 in a row all the time.

 

The point I was making is that sometimes those 2 are in different places, so we shouldn't assume that if she's doing BST on Friday, she wouldn't be doing Glasto on the Saturday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I used to love going to Glastonbury when it was more affordable, no matter who ended up playing. I lucked out in 22 with a great lineup for the price. I'll still try for a ticket on Sunday of course but if those are our 3 Pyramid headliners (Rihanna, Fender, Rodrigo in whatever order) that's a sorry indictment of where the festival has ended up in my eyes. Rihanna mimed her way through the superbowl, I don't get the fuss about O-Rod (I've listened to a few songs and literally sounds the same as the rest of what's in the charts nowadays) and not a fan of Fender either. 

 

All I can say is there needs to be a damn good lineup over the rest of the festival or I'll be returning my ticket at them prices if I get one. It's got to the point now where a ticket needs to be justified by the lineup on offer for me and I love the place having been (I think) 7 times.

Edited by mungo57
Typo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, mungo57 said:

I used to love going to Glastonbury when it was more affordable, no matter who ended up playing. I lucked out in 22 with a great lineup for the price. I'll still try for a ticket on Sunday of course but if those are our 3 Pyramid headliners (Rihanna, Fender, Rodrigo in whatever order) that's a sorry indictment of where the festival has ended up in my eyes. Rihanna mimed her way through the superbowl, I don't get the fuss about O-Rod (I've listened to a few songs and literally sounds the same as the rest of what's in the charts nowadays) and not a fan of Fender either. 

 

All I can say is there needs to be a damn good lineup over the rest of the festival or I'll be returning my ticket at them prices if I get one. It's got to the point now where a ticket needs to be justified by the lineup on offer for me and I love the place having been (I think) 7 times.

 

I think you can't get more old school than AM-GnR-Elton in 2023... last year should have been Dua-Coldplay-Madonna... losing the biggest of those three and replacing with SZA was unfortunate.  Being in my 40s, I'm personally happy as long as there's one Pyramid headliner I want to see... didn't see any last year (can't stand Coldplay, so the obligatory legend-act didn't work for me!), but had a great time elsewhere.  Madonna would have been amazing though!  Rihanna - Fender - Rodrigo doesn't sound good to me at all, and I'd have to hope for great stuff elsewhere again!  I'm sure there'll be an older act though - just hope it's someone I like this time!  I don't think the current speculated line-up is an indication of Glasto's direction though.  I'm sure they'd be booking Oasis, Queen+Adam Lambert, Madonna, Pulp (!) etc if they were available!

 

PS - I want Erasure to headline the Park one year please!! 😄

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, mungo57 said:

All I can say is there needs to be a damn good lineup over the rest of the festival or I'll be returning my ticket at them prices if I get one. It's got to the point now where a ticket needs to be justified by the lineup on offer for me and I love the place having been (I think) 7 times.

I would usually say "it's not about the headliners", but when tickets are nearly £400 it does feel like big hitters are needed (even if they're not necessarily ones I would choose to see)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, nikkic said:


As it stands I’d say….

 

Liv on lock.

 

They’re aiming for a big fish such as Stevie W or Rihanna.

 

One of Fender or Fred for the final slot, or both if they can’t reel the big fish.

 

 

 

I always wonder in these situations, how it actually plays out... would they say to Fred's agent, "well... you're literally our second choice and we think it'd be great and all that, but we're just holding out to see if we can get someone with a few more miles on the clock" 🙂 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Sasperella2 said:

I would usually say "it's not about the headliners", but when tickets are nearly £400 it does feel like big hitters are needed (even if they're not necessarily ones I would choose to see)

 

 

 

I dunno its £30-40 to see academy size bands these days - so if you see 10 £40 sized acts - the you are quids in - and I could do that at Glastonbury in one day

 

£400 For Glastonbury is still incredible value regardless of if you watch headliners or not

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, stuie said:

 

 

I always wonder in these situations, how it actually plays out... would they say to Fred's agent, "well... you're literally our second choice and we think it'd be great and all that, but we're just holding out to see if we can get someone with a few more miles on the clock" 🙂 

If I were Fred in that case, I’d tell them to do one

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Ben7amin_ said:

 

 

 

I dunno its £30-40 to see academy size bands these days - so if you see 10 £40 sized acts - the you are quids in - and I could do that at Glastonbury in one day

 

£400 For Glastonbury is still incredible value regardless of if you watch headliners or not


It really is. Even if they finish up going for Rodrigo, Fender and Again, tickets for those 3 in Arenas would comfortably set you back £200+

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, Skip997 said:

It’s not about the lineup 

 

And even if it is, there will always be enough on over the 5 days for everyone. 
 

What would happen if they announced that the line wouldn’t be revealed and only available in the program on site. 

They should genuinely do this

 

they never would but it would be ace

 

you could argue that at £380 it is about the lineup but glastonbury has never provided a bad lineup

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Memory Man said:

They should genuinely do this

 

they never would but it would be ace

 

you could argue that at £380 it is about the lineup but glastonbury has never provided a bad lineup

I’d love it. 
 

With round about 100 stages and around 19 hours of music in 24, It’s actually impossible for Glastonbury to provide a bad lineup 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Ben7amin_ said:

 

 

 

I dunno its £30-40 to see academy size bands these days - so if you see 10 £40 sized acts - the you are quids in - and I could do that at Glastonbury in one day

 

£400 For Glastonbury is still incredible value regardless of if you watch headliners or not

 

I would probably do 2, maybe 3 a day

2 hours ago, MEGABOWL said:


It really is. Even if they finish up going for Rodrigo, Fender and Again, tickets for those 3 in Arenas would comfortably set you back £200+

 

For me nowadays it's getting very lineup dependent as the acts are changing. If you don't want any of those 3 either then you can discount that cost. I've done a lot of the areas now multiple times whereby I'm not finding new areas 

 

Firstly, I think you'd be very lucky to get most academy bands for £30 to £40 these days and the show you get at the academy will be much different. You can be closer, indoor, more intimate etc. Glastonbury for many will have a lot of acts that are like I can see them I guess vs one's they might actually choose to watch elsewhere. I've had it be worth it for me many times but I can also see how if you don't have that where those acts are for you then it's not just a case of any array of bands is worth it for everyone. Personally I doubt there are loads of people who go to say Bloodstock, Download, Arctangent and the likes that would instantly see Glastonbury as worthwhile.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If it’s only about the lineup and whether it’s better value compared to catching individual gigs, then you probably get more from seeing the artists involved at their own show. Invariably festival sets are short, usually tailored to an audience less familiar with their work and are often outdoors in the daylight, so they aren’t really equivalent. But, there’s a lot more to the festival that makes it great value (albeit still expensive). I’ve never left the festival though and mentally calculated what it would have cost to see the acts I did elsewhere, it’s just not why I attend. Other festivals I’ve frequented over the years have been more music focussed, so when the lineups drifted towards acts I wasn’t interested in, I did too and found other festivals to go to that were more aligned with my taste. So far, there’s still way too much for me to see at any one Glasto, but if it ever gets to the stage where I am at a loss to find something interesting, I’ll move on to a different festival (it’s highly unlikely, given the breadth of what is on offer across the site…even now I spend less time at stages that were mainstays when I was younger). 
 

edit: I should add though that a great festival set, even if shorter, can be an all timer with a crowd many times bigger than the act usually commands, so swings and roundabouts! One of the special things about a great festival!

Edited by Toilet Duck
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Toilet Duck said:

If it’s only about the lineup and whether it’s better value compared to catching individual gigs, then you probably get more from seeing the artists involved at their own show. Invariably festival sets are short, usually tailored to an audience less familiar with their work and are often outdoors in the daylight, so they aren’t really equivalent. But, there’s a lot more to the festival that makes it great value (albeit still expensive). I’ve never left the festival though and mentally calculated what it would have cost to see the acts I did elsewhere, it’s just not why I attend. Other festivals I’ve frequented over the years have been more music focussed, so when the lineups drifted towards acts I wasn’t interested in, I did too and found other festivals to go to that were more aligned with my taste. So far, there’s still way too much for me to see at any one Glasto, but if it ever gets to the stage where I am at a loss to find something interesting, I’ll move on to a different festival (it’s highly unlikely, given the breadth of what is on offer across the site…even now I spend less time at stages that were mainstays when I was younger). 

As a sum up of that, I've never left and calculated it but I have left and thought have I enjoyed that as much as some other years. I genuinely didn't know how I was feeling everything with the festival and the heat took so much out of me etc on day 1 that before the bands even started on Friday properly I was questioning returning. 

To be honest there are a fair few acts that I've thought I'd have gathered just wait for their own gigs so it's a bit catch 22. I get value is there compared to gigs...which are way over priced these days it kinda just comes down to when I feel I'm done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, northernangel said:

As a sum up of that, I've never left and calculated it but I have left and thought have I enjoyed that as much as some other years. I genuinely didn't know how I was feeling everything with the festival and the heat took so much out of me etc on day 1 that before the bands even started on Friday properly I was questioning returning. 

To be honest there are a fair few acts that I've thought I'd have gathered just wait for their own gigs so it's a bit catch 22. I get value is there compared to gigs...which are way over priced these days it kinda just comes down to when I feel I'm done.

Oh I definitely compare to previous years, not in terms of cost, but certainly enjoyment. Generally weather and company are the two principal determinants though rather than who I have seen (it’s a factor alright, but not the main one). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Avalon_Fields said:

I probably value the experiences I’ve had at the festival with friends etc. much more than the acts I’ve seen, and those experiences remain priceless and unforgettable

It's as much what you're looking to get from it, right?

 

Moreso than other festivals, where a lot of it is just oriented about who's on the bill and if they're any good or not, Glastonbury attracts those who see it as a social opportunity with a gang of chums or people who go a lot because they love the fact it has a lot on top of just being any old festival. Even if tbf I know some Download Festival every-year attendees for that similar reason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Sasperella2 said:

I would usually say "it's not about the headliners", but when tickets are nearly £400 it does feel like big hitters are needed (even if they're not necessarily ones I would choose to see)

Definitely not about the headliners, but assuming NCATBS sub, not do other, there wouldn't be anything for me to watch at all on the 2 main stages at least as a headliner. I'm aware there are many stages, but for £400 a ticket I'd want there to be a bigger name to see in the evenings nowadays. I agree with other posters that if not, you still get value. It's just a sad state to me when these pop acts keep coming through and headlining (not my cup of tea at all).

 

3 hours ago, CR77 said:

 

I think you can't get more old school than AM-GnR-Elton in 2023... last year should have been Dua-Coldplay-Madonna... losing the biggest of those three and replacing with SZA was unfortunate.  Being in my 40s, I'm personally happy as long as there's one Pyramid headliner I want to see... didn't see any last year (can't stand Coldplay, so the obligatory legend-act didn't work for me!), but had a great time elsewhere.  Madonna would have been amazing though!  Rihanna - Fender - Rodrigo doesn't sound good to me at all, and I'd have to hope for great stuff elsewhere again!  I'm sure there'll be an older act though - just hope it's someone I like this time!  I don't think the current speculated line-up is an indication of Glasto's direction though.  I'm sure they'd be booking Oasis, Queen+Adam Lambert, Madonna, Pulp (!) etc if they were available!

 

PS - I want Erasure to headline the Park one year please!! 😄

 

Just so happens I'm into all 3 of the headliners, AM probably biggest British band when they're active other than Coldplay maybe, and literally everyone (well almost) saw Elton. The rest of the lineup that year was very strong for my tastes too, we saw some great bands.

 

 

I'm sure I'll find stuff to watch or do, but with all the extra people on site, it being impossible to get into anywhere in the night areas that isn't playing drum n bass (this was our experience on the Saturday night 22) that takes away a lot of the value. As the price goes up, your average person will think the same. 

 

It's also quite sad I'm saying this as I genuinely love the place but money is money, my wages aren't going up and £400 give or take is a big chunk.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Avalon_Fields said:

I probably value the experiences I’ve had at the festival with friends etc. much more than the acts I’ve seen, and those experiences remain priceless and unforgettable

I also get that but I've felt my time coming for a while. Mentally I can't do it and the cost of it all much longer. A lot of my favourite acts just don't play it anymore.

 

7 minutes ago, Toilet Duck said:

Oh I definitely compare to previous years, not in terms of cost, but certainly enjoyment. Generally weather and company are the two principal determinants though rather than who I have seen (it’s a factor alright, but not the main one). 

 

Yeah I think that's probably what I mean more. Like how much I'm paying for how much I'm enjoying the festival. It's getting much more something I do because I've doen it for years and I'll see bands but the overall vibe, excitement, festival feel is not there like it was.

 

6 minutes ago, mungo57 said:

Definitely not about the headliners, but assuming NCATBS sub, not do other, there wouldn't be anything for me to watch at all on the 2 main stages at least as a headliner. I'm aware there are many stages, but for £400 a ticket I'd want there to be a bigger name to see in the evenings nowadays. I agree with other posters that if not, you still get value. It's just a sad state to me when these pop acts keep coming through and headlining (not my cup of tea at all).

 

 

Just so happens I'm into all 3 of the headliners, AM probably biggest British band when they're active other than Coldplay maybe, and literally everyone (well almost) saw Elton. The rest of the lineup that year was very strong for my tastes too, we saw some great bands.

 

 

I'm sure I'll find stuff to watch or do, but with all the extra people on site, it being impossible to get into anywhere in the night areas that isn't playing drum n bass (this was our experience on the Saturday night 22) that takes away a lot of the value. As the price goes up, your average person will think the same. 

 

It's also quite sad I'm saying this as I genuinely love the place but money is money, my wages aren't going up and £400 give or take is a big chunk.

 

I think a lot of this sums it up. 2023 was a year when I saw some great acts and new options. Not a stellar year but acts I enjoyed a lot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Sasperella2 said:

I would usually say "it's not about the headliners", but when tickets are nearly £400 it does feel like big hitters are needed (even if they're not necessarily ones I would choose to see)


welcome to the Coachella conundrum. $550 ( base price ) and youre expecting A listed every year. Its def getting there with Glasto cause if the price point. Doesnt matter if its about the "experience". 90% of everyone there wants those top 4 to matter. Its all optics.

 

Ac/Dc tour tomorrow so thatll clear something up

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, Suprefan said:


welcome to the Coachella conundrum. $550 ( base price ) and youre expecting A listed every year. Its def getting there with Glasto cause if the price point. Doesnt matter if its about the "experience". 90% of everyone there wants those top 4 to matter. Its all optics.

 

Ac/Dc tour tomorrow so thatll clear something up

I'll clear it up for you now. ACDC aren't playing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...