Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Headliners 2023


Crazyfool01

Recommended Posts

11 hours ago, maelzoid said:

Fair enough. But if we’re taking about Bruce’s epics, I do hate Outlaw Pete, but probably more because of what it’s not; Jungleland, Backstreets, incident, NYC serenade, Rosalita or Racing in the Street.

kiss called, they want their song back 😛 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, mike46 said:

I always like it when headliners do ‘something’ to mark the occasion. Off the top of my head from the years I’ve been going:

Jay Z - Oasis cover walk on

Muse - had the Edge join them

U2 - had a video link from space 

Coldplay (2011) - turned the pyramid different colours

Arctics - used strings 

Stones - reworked Factory Girl into Glastonbury Girl. Also played 2,000 Light Years for the first time in years in a nod to the arctics

Mumfords - invited a load of guests for a big singalong 

Kanye - had the crane 

Coldplay (2016) - had the bracelets, although I think they used these in their tour too

Radiohead - hits setlist

Stormzy - special guests and the ballet dancers

Killers - special guests

The Cure - hits setlist (although that might be common, I’m not sure)

McCartney - special guests

Kendrick - unique setlist and show 

 

Any I missed?

 

 

The Cure was a very standard set for that tour, though it was a ‘festival’ tour so very calibrated.

Springsteen started with a Glastonbury special but after that was as standard a set as he does.

Coldplay wristbands were standard but getting Gibb and Eavis on wasn’t.

Metallica-I think was a normal setlist but do they always do that thing with the fans at the back of the stage?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, charlierc said:

I think that was a regular bit on the U2 360 Tour in 2011 giving that Bono knew the astronaut in question. Though it's also fair to note that the tour they had at that time would've been impractical to bring to Glastonbury given both that it used a fucking massive stage designed for stadiums and that all the apparatus for it was in the USA as Glasto was plonked in-between 2 US stadium shows.

I think the setlist idea was right - started with 5 Achtung Baby songs with Zoo TV style imagery, then Joshua Tree Tour opening, 2000's hits, Live Aid set and then a few odds & sods at the end. What they got wrong imo was thinking they could just fly in from a US show on a Wednesday night, do Glasto on the Friday, then back on a Sunday. Even if it was pissing it down, I doubt it was exactly fresh. That and looking back at it, they were out of sync with the backing track on the opening song, making it a bit of a messy start.

Someone said they think U2 could do another crack at this but that it would be funny if it was as rainy, which... fair. I think they themselves would be amused to come back only to get soggy again.

You also had Bono nearly falling over and then stressing about his back

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, charlierc said:

Hmmm... that bit is understandable given it was still only just over a year from a pretty substantial back operation he had to have that lead to the planned 2010 date being canned.

Absolutely. Didn’t help them though, in terms of what they were able to deliver.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Rose-Colored Boy said:

At the rate the MCU is declining in quality they’ll hopefully have the good sense to stop making them before that (he says optimistically) 

Given they have movies and TV shows planned out through to 2026, perhaps not. Saying that, there's so many storylines in parallel splintering around the place that I'm guessing he won't be in all of them.

Edited by charlierc
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Rose-Colored Boy said:

At the rate the MCU is declining in quality they’ll hopefully have the good sense to stop making them before that (he says optimistically) 

I got off after Endgame, Spider-Man is the only Phase 4 movie I’ve watched (watched a few of the series too).

Felt like a perfect place to stop.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, charlierc said:

Given they have movies and TV shows planned out through to 2026, perhaps not. Saying that, there's so many storylines in parallel splintering around the place that I'm guessing he won't be in all of them.

Won’t be in most of them but could easily get called for the odd cameo which would affect touring plans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MEGABOWL said:

The Cure was a very standard set for that tour, though it was a ‘festival’ tour so very calibrated.

Springsteen started with a Glastonbury special but after that was as standard a set as he does.

Coldplay wristbands were standard but getting Gibb and Eavis on wasn’t.

Metallica-I think was a normal setlist but do they always do that thing with the fans at the back of the stage?

Wheeling out Eavis in his denim shorts at a gig in Denmark would have been epic 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, mike46 said:

I always like it when headliners do ‘something’ to mark the occasion. Off the top of my head from the years I’ve been going:

Jay Z - Oasis cover walk on

Muse - had the Edge join them

U2 - had a video link from space 

Coldplay (2011) - turned the pyramid different colours

Arctics - used strings 

Stones - reworked Factory Girl into Glastonbury Girl. Also played 2,000 Light Years for the first time in years in a nod to the arctics

Mumfords - invited a load of guests for a big singalong 

Kanye - had the crane 

Coldplay (2016) - had the bracelets, although I think they used these in their tour too

Radiohead - hits setlist

Stormzy - special guests and the ballet dancers

Killers - special guests

The Cure - hits setlist (although that might be common, I’m not sure)

McCartney - special guests

Kendrick - unique setlist and show 

 

Any I missed?

 

 

Beyonce had that bizarre Tricky cameo and had a video of festival goers play behind her during Halo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...