Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Headliners 2023


Crazyfool01

Recommended Posts

The thing with Foos is they already did their big career-spanning greatest hits set and there's only been 2 festivals since then. The only difference now would be they'd obviously be without Taylor, who was a massive part of the band. Not saying it can never happen but feels far too soon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agree with the general sentiment regarding the Foo’s. It would be weirdly soon for ‘23 and still quite surprising for ‘24. Although it’ll be six years since they last played this year, it’s only three festivals ago and there are surely bands and acts backed up to play at this point. 

Looks like Arctics are locked in, then. It’s the third headliner which is unknown at this point. Could be GnR, but potentially a curveball like Eminem or Dua 🤞

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whilst I understand the vibe around the Foo's and it having only been a short time since they last played I would say 2 things:

1. They have at least released an album since they last played.

2. They were heavily rumored to be topping the bill of the the 2021 day festival that Glastonbury very nearly put on so given it wasn't deemed too soon then, why would it be now?

I've also been told that they will be there this year (however not in which capacity) but I'm taking that with a pinch of salt even though it's originated from a very credible place.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, JoeyT said:

Whilst I understand the vibe around the Foo's and it having only been a short time since they last played I would say 2 things:

1. They have at least released an album since they last played.

2. They were heavily rumored to be topping the bill of the the 2021 day festival that Glastonbury very nearly put on so given it wasn't deemed too soon then, why would it be now?

I've also been told that they will be there this year (however not in which capacity) but I'm taking that with a pinch of salt even though it's originated from a very credible place.

I could maybe see a John Peel secret set this year, like the Killers in 2017 but they'd need to be up against some big names around the rest of the site to prevent some serious crowding issues. They'd also need to keep it as quiet as possible, which in the age of social media and sharing information (regardless of credibility), is getting more and more difficult to achieve

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, JoeyT said:

Whilst I understand the vibe around the Foo's and it having only been a short time since they last played I would say 2 things:

1. They have at least released an album since they last played.

2. They were heavily rumored to be topping the bill of the the 2021 day festival that Glastonbury very nearly put on so given it wasn't deemed too soon then, why would it be now?

I've also been told that they will be there this year (however not in which capacity) but I'm taking that with a pinch of salt even though it's originated from a very credible place.

So they might swap out a handful of songs for the new ones, it will still likely be the same set which is fresh in everyone's memory.

I don't think the day festival thing means anything, Glastonbury likely had to get someone they had a good relationship who'd be down to do it, in that instance Dave and co took the call or at least showed interest. Given the circumstances of just getting a festival going in June 2021 (I don't think any big festivals happened in the end anywhere) rebooking someone who'd done in recently isn't that surprising.

This is an efestival mindset though, I think it'd be a naff booking but the average goer would probs go taps aff

Edit: As others have said it was a festival in September, but still my general point still stands

Edited by scatteredscreens
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Neil said:

if glastonbury tried to do a day festival it would spoil the relationship with the locals and cause them hassle going forwards.

We know they floated the idea for that Equinox thing that was slated for September 2021, they even put a permission request in that was approved IIRC.

For whatever reason it didn't go ahead but they certainly tried.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Hugh Jass II said:

We know they floated the idea for that Equinox thing that was slated for September 2021, they even put a permission request in that was approved IIRC.

For whatever reason it didn't go ahead but they certainly tried.

There was a healthy virtual efestival members attendance at the council meeting!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Supernintendo Chalmers said:

I could maybe see a John Peel secret set this year, like the Killers in 2017 but they'd need to be up against some big names around the rest of the site to prevent some serious crowding issues. They'd also need to keep it as quiet as possible, which in the age of social media and sharing information (regardless of credibility), is getting more and more difficult to achieve

If it is a secret set they are of to a terrible start as it seems we already know about it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Florian Saucer Attack said:

If it is a secret set they are of to a terrible start as it seems we already know about it

Has there actually been many "secret" sets that haven't been leaked in someway beforehand?

I remember way back when going to a Biffy set at the Park and they were handing out flyers for it if I remember correctly.

Obviously we had the sign painter leaking the George Ezra set at JP last year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, JoeyT said:

Has there actually been many "secret" sets that haven't been leaked in someway beforehand?

I remember way back when going to a Biffy set at the Park and they were handing out flyers for it if I remember correctly.

Obviously we had the sign painter leaking the George Ezra set at JP last year.

I don't think anyone knew about the Idles secret set last year. At least I didn't hear anyone mention it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Florian Saucer Attack said:

I don't think anyone knew about the Idles secret set last year. At least I didn't hear anyone mention it

Think it was mentioned the day before or something. The band had been teasing them practicing Slow Savage too 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, JSmurphy said:

It really is about time Foo Fighters headline Download. 

Andy actually sounded like he was ready to breathe a bit more fresh air into Download going forward in a recent interview. Fresh air is an odd term when talking about bands like Foo Fighters, but this is Download, they've finally got BMTH headlining who are long overdue and the first new headliner in 6 years. Maybe just maybe Foos will show up in the future, he did mention them specifically in a shortlist. 

Edited by BenG92
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Secret sets featuring any popular act are a big mistake for a sizeable festival. They’re not going to be secret for long and only serve to create huge crowd bottlenecks for stages where the sound is dodgy at best. 50% of the crowd will have a lame experience. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, kalifire said:

Secret sets featuring any popular act are a big mistake for a sizeable festival. They’re not going to be secret for long and only serve to create huge crowd bottlenecks for stages where the sound is dodgy at best. 50% of the crowd will have a lame experience. 

They don't seem to have hurt glastonbury? Not ideal for everyone sure but amazing for those who get in. Its better than the acts not playing at all e.g. in 2017 Killers were never going to play as a sub but some people go to see them in the JP - better than nothing

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, gfa said:

They don't seem to have hurt glastonbury? Not ideal for everyone sure but amazing for those who get in. Its better than the acts not playing at all e.g. in 2017 Killers were never going to play as a sub but some people go to see them in the JP - better than nothing

Still the best atmosphere I’ve ever been a part of. Amazing 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...