Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

BBC Coverage 2022


Cooter

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Barry Fish said:

Just thinking its an incredibly stupid move really.  Wonder who he is trying to appeal too ? 

I mean I'm enjoying it but I kind of expected a stripped down play the hit kind of deal thing.

Think he's just doing what he wants to do with the stage show - think he's touring his album now with most of these songs on. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Toilet Duck said:

They were absolutely fantastic. Have seen them since they began and the evolution of their sound and musicianship has been pretty startling. Same energy but sounding immense now. There was lots of talk beforehand about potential Glastonbury moments. Felt sure it would be during Macca (did get a bit of a lump in the throat for the first few chords of Let it Be)…but as it turns out, the couple across the way into the stripped down version of big shot was comfortably my moment of the festival…huge performance from them considering they were up against the legends slot. 

Excellent to hear. I only saw last 15 minutes but it's one I'll go back to for sure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do not expect to see this Years and Years set on prime time BBC2.

Can only imagine the conversations in the production department on how to show this.

 

Either way it's a bloody good performance from him and all his stage dancers. 

Edited by willgooneday
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Zoo Music Girl said:

Yeah I've been wondering this! He crowdsurfed with it during Amyl!

 

10 minutes ago, benali said:

The guy who keeps going in pits holding a guitar up in the air. WTF?

He’s had some tv coverage this weekend, he was front and centre at Skunk Anasie and Idles 😂

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Toilet Duck said:

They were absolutely fantastic. Have seen them since they began and the evolution of their sound and musicianship has been pretty startling. Same energy but sounding immense now. There was lots of talk beforehand about potential Glastonbury moments. Felt sure it would be during Macca (did get a bit of a lump in the throat for the first few chords of Let it Be)…but as it turns out, the couple across the way into the stripped down version of big shot was comfortably my moment of the festival…huge performance from them considering they were up against the legends slot. 

I felt the same, loved the intensity.  Spent the afternoon trying to decide where to see them for my birthday in November- Dublin, Belfast or Edinburgh (my home town). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've actually really enjoyed Lorde. Green Light and Royals were gorgeous big singalong moments. Also I just have a soft spot for her.

Will be going back to watch a bit of Jarv shortly.

Mind is boggling about Years and Years so will have to check that out! Loved them in 2019.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Zoo Music Girl said:

I've actually really enjoyed Lorde. Green Light and Royals were gorgeous big singalong moments. Also I just have a soft spot for her.

Will be going back to watch a bit of Jarv shortly.

Mind is boggling about Years and Years so will have to check that out! Loved them in 2019.

I also really enjoyed Lorde and Green Light, a little surprised Years and Years are so high up and have pulled a bigger crowd than Lorde tho...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Zoo Music Girl said:

I've actually really enjoyed Lorde. Green Light and Royals were gorgeous big singalong moments. Also I just have a soft spot for her.

Will be going back to watch a bit of Jarv shortly.

Mind is boggling about Years and Years so will have to check that out! Loved them in 2019.

Apparently that's his stage show from his latest tour lifted straight for Glastonbury with presumably a few less songs - either way it's absolutely incredible. Just pure eclectic unashamed fun.

 

They'd (him and his dance troupe) make a great headliner on fun factor, but there probably nowhere near big enough. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, ghostdancer1 said:

Tiny crowd though.

Never heard of her either, so amazed she's that high up WH.

Saw the last few songs and she was great. She's pretty big to be fair, I guess if you want to judge it by social media then she has way more followers than bands like Fontaines or Idles. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, willgooneday said:

Anyway Pet Shop Boys up with a tough gig following that. 

Considering the alternatives they should have most of the older crowd still left in the field. Kendrick / Bicep / Charli is a hell of a split for the young'uns. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, BenG92 said:

Considering the alternatives they should have most of the older crowd still left in the field. Kendrick / Bicep / Charli is a hell of a split for the young'uns. 

Bicep can sod off and Charli plays every festival going every year. Kendrick is where it’s at ❤️

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Rose-Colored Boy said:

Bicep can sod off and Charli plays every festival going every year. Kendrick is where it’s at ❤️

I like both the others but will be checking out the Kenny set and praying he does the career spanning setlist he did in the states not long ago! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...