Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

When will this shit end?


Chrisp1986

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Supernintendo Chalmers said:

At what point do we think that the daily death rate becomes "significant" again? Is that data even driving decisions anymore? Feels dirty even saying it when over 300 people have died so far this month

No idea. I think 100/day would be a moment, especially if stays above 100/day for a week or two.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Barry Fish said:

My brother in law who is a A&E nurse gets extremely fucking annoyed at these headlines.  He says its true everyone is fucking knackered but he says he doesn't know where the distressed bit comes in.  He is pretty blunt says its his job - its what he is trained to do and he has always been 100% working his arse off anyway.

He of course only speaks for himself and the colleagues he works directly with.  But I can't help but think there is a major oversaction in some of these headlines.

But what about your milkman ? Don’t think we have heard from him yet ? Seriously you are right though he only speaks for himself and No others unless he’s conducted a poll ? Maybe we could look at what some of the top bods at the Nhs and what they are saying ? Might give a better picture ? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, stuartbert two hats said:

Indeed it did pre 2008, when the only thing in the SE corner was the much less mainstream Lost Vagueness.

The bar gets set higher every year and I get that its difficult and even undesirable to row back from that, but even so Glasto is a unique brand that will remain obscenely popular regardless of direction imho.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Chapple12345 said:

Balearic Islands are back on the amber list as of Monday 

Not sure about the sense of this whole list now with countries like Bulgaria and Croatia (the latter where Austria had this summer issue with them last year) I get a bit of a headache, really.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, Barry Fish said:

They could always just get the vaccine...  Seriously don't get the fear...  The vaccines work.

I don't think this is primarily coming from anti-vaxxers. Indeed, most anti-vaxxers have been against restrictions all along. It's from people that are vaccinated, or partly vaccinated, and for any host of reasons are still worried. 

What's confusing me is the same people who are saying that we have to trust the vaccine and "if not now, when" are the same ones talking about a "peak" after which cases will start to drop because cases can't go up indefinitely.

Feels like one answers the other to me "if not now, when?" "after the peak".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Barry Fish said:

Stop moaning and put your mask on!   

Its funny how the first sign of a mask mandate and your start to moan after months of having a go at me for not liking them...

It’s not the “first sign of a mask mandate”. Masks on public transport and in certain shops have been mandated for months now. I have no problem with that - it seems sensible and proportionate. But when a tiny number of cases pop up nowhere near most people, it quickly becomes overkill to insist that everyone should now wear masks everywhere.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, DeanoL said:

I don't think this is primarily coming from anti-vaxxers. Indeed, most anti-vaxxers have been against restrictions all along. It's from people that are vaccinated, or partly vaccinated, and for any host of reasons are still worried. 

What's confusing me is the same people who are saying that we have to trust the vaccine and "if not now, when" are the same ones talking about a "peak" after which cases will start to drop because cases can't go up indefinitely.

Feels like one answers the other to me "if not now, when?" "after the peak".

Yeah I've never seen any of the conspiracy type people ever ask for restrictions to protect them, like you say they're fully anti restrictions. This is definitely coming from those who are worried despite being vaccinated, with a small few younger who think it's unfair to open before they've had their second. I kind of sympathise with that one but statistics are on their side even if they'd had zero vaccines. Getting ill (but not bad enough to need hospital) is part of life but I think we've forgotten this collectively! 

Edited by efcfanwirral
Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, Barry Fish said:

My brother in law who is a A&E nurse gets extremely fucking annoyed at these headlines.  He says its true everyone is fucking knackered but he says he doesn't know where the distressed bit comes in.  He is pretty blunt says its his job - its what he is trained to do and he has always been 100% working his arse off anyway.

He of course only speaks for himself and the colleagues he works directly with.  But I can't help but think there is a major oversaction in some of these headlines.

And my best mate who is a doctor at the NHS says everyone is somewhat stressed and concerned about the months ahead.

Honestly mate, your use of (somehow you have about 10 family members all in the NHS....) personal anecdotes are not a reflection of the broader picture.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Barry Fish said:

The righteous lockdown crew are on form tonight.

Nobody is righeous, but I just think it's disengenuous to use personal anecdotes like that and spin it as a way of telling the broader picture.

FWIW I am not doubting your family members view, I'm just saying that there are also a lot of other people in the NHS who might say different.....

Edited by MrBarry465
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The victimhood complex is alive and well, I see. Bloke who posts his opinions in this thread multiple times daily complains he has “no space to express” any. Reminds me of this. 

 

Edited by kalifire
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Nobody Interesting said:

Both my sister in laws are Doctors in the NHS. One a consultant Paediactic surgeon and the other a GP.

They are both exhausted, demoralised, fed up but working hard..................................... general moral is lower than ever

I don't blame them, they all deserve massive fucking pay rises.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Chapple12345 said:

 

That doesn't add up to 100%? 63% non vaccinated, + 14% 1 jab (77% in total), + 15% with 2 jabs, totals 92%. Who are the other 8%?

Edited by tigger123
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...