Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

When will this shit end?


Chrisp1986

Recommended Posts

30 minutes ago, Ozanne said:

Yeah they said yesterday that the roadmap will stay in place as whilst we haven’t yet seen (if we even will) any uptick after schools have gone back it’s just one stage. So they still need to keep an eye on things as we open up, as we wouldn’t want to open up too quickly and risk going back a step. 

Yep, this isn't actually difficult to understand (or unreasonable) but some people feel the need to pretend that they don't understand the basic concept every time they post the daily data, and in no way is it tedious! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, steviewevie said:

My kid is out protesting tomorrow apparently. Not sure if it's kill the bill, reclaim the streets or anti lockdown. Maybe she'll get arrested and get on tv.

The protest I was watching was really pushing that as a big one on the live comments thing ... does seem like the numbers seem to be increasing though now ... for me though the lack of clarity about what the protest focus is ... defeats the object somewhat ... although of course it is bound to get other causes involved ... no way of stopping that 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Mr.Tease said:

Yep, this isn't actually difficult to understand (or unreasonable) but some people feel the need to pretend that they don't understand the basic concept every time they post the daily data, and in no way is it tedious! 

I feel awful living in your head rent free x

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Mr.Tease said:

Yep, this isn't actually difficult to understand (or unreasonable) but some people feel the need to pretend that they don't understand the basic concept every time they post the daily data, and in no way is it tedious! 

I do think if we are in the same low deaths/hospitalisations/cases position in a few weeks, perfectly reasonable to expect and ask for a speed up. Lockdown isn't a good thing and should go asap

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The government have created the calling for speeding up themselves by drilling home the ‘data not dates’ slogan though. It works both ways, and the data is certainly pointing towards maybe speeding up the roadmap.
Soon it may be difficult for them to justify why it can’t move faster. But we’ll have to see how it goes. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm moving towards a quicker unlocking of outdoor activities.

If the old tiers system was still in place most of country would be in tier 2 with shops open and indoor hospitality. Half the population has since been vaccinated and over 50's done soon. Massive lockdown fatigue for me personally.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, zahidf said:

I do think if we are in the same low deaths/hospitalisations/cases position in a few weeks, perfectly reasonable to expect and ask for a speed up. Lockdown isn't a good thing and should go asap

It’s looking great at the moment ... but could you or is there any data available for unlocking with the jabs in play .? We are part of a real life experiment 🧪 and It’s better to take a slower route than have to reverse surely ? Not long now untill we meet groups of mates again outside and that’s going to help ... I think you were saying that people were ignoring restrictions anyway ... ? So is that much more mental damage being done ? Maybe just economic at this stage ? I’m feeling better as I can see the end 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, st dan said:

The government have created the calling for speeding up themselves by drilling home the ‘data not dates’ slogan though. It works both ways, and the data is certainly pointing towards maybe speeding up the roadmap.
Soon it may be difficult for them to justify why it can’t move faster. But we’ll have to see how it goes. 

it was always data at  set dates though...with those dates being the earliest that next stage of opening could happen.

Maybe they will speed things up, I don't know...but the roadmap wasn't totally determined by data alone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Ozanne said:

10 days till we can socialise outdoors with a group of friends again. We are getting there slowly but surely. 

I’m going for my first break of restrictions and doing it one day early ... hopefully I won’t put us back into lockdown 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, crazyfool1 said:

It’s looking great at the moment ... but could you or is there any data available for unlocking with the jabs in play .? We are part of a real life experiment 🧪 and It’s better to take a slower route than have to reverse surely ? Not long now untill we meet groups of mates again outside and that’s going to help ... I think you were saying that people were ignoring restrictions anyway ... ? So is that much more mental damage being done ? Maybe just economic at this stage ? I’m feeling better as I can see the end 

I'm broadly ok with the dates but the school are the major infection point really. I dont see why we can't speed some elements up if cases are still staying low this time next week. 

For example, less restrictions in May for indoor hospitality. Or museums to open in April. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, august1 said:

I'm moving towards a quicker unlocking of outdoor activities.

If the old tiers system was still in place most of country would be in tier 2 with shops open and indoor hospitality. Half the population has since been vaccinated and over 50's done soon. Massive lockdown fatigue for me personally.

To be honest I reckon if it was a month ahead in the calendar maybe they would bring forward the outdoor pub thing, but it's so cold you'd get people either just not going (so economically not justifiable) or getting cold and carrying on at people's houses 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, crazyfool1 said:

The protest I was watching was really pushing that as a big one on the live comments thing ... does seem like the numbers seem to be increasing though now ... for me though the lack of clarity about what the protest focus is ... defeats the object somewhat ... although of course it is bound to get other causes involved ... no way of stopping that 

World wide rally for freedom & democracy,

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, zahidf said:

I'm broadly ok with the dates but the school are the major infection point really. I dont see why we can't speed some elements up if cases are still staying low this time next week. 

For example, less restrictions in May for indoor hospitality. Or museums to open in April. 

that's perfectly reasonable, but not sure he'll do it...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, JoeyT said:

I feel awful living in your head rent free x

I don't really understand this internet thing of being proud or happy if someone finds something you're doing a bit tedious. sure, don't care or keep doing it anyway, but I'm not sure how it counts as a win, we're not in competition, you're not my arch nemesis, we just disagree on things! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, zahidf said:

I do think if we are in the same low deaths/hospitalisations/cases position in a few weeks, perfectly reasonable to expect and ask for a speed up. Lockdown isn't a good thing and should go asap

It is a perfectly valid argument, but does it have to be made in the "data not dates" way EVERY day? We're not able to change policy, you're lobbying the wrong people! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...