Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

When will this shit end?


Chrisp1986

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, steviewevie said:

we've just started to unlock.

It’s 2 weeks tomorrow we can start to socialise with a group of friends outside as well, if the reopening of schools doesn’t have much of an impact.  We are slowly but surely leaving lockdown which will hopefully be for the last time. 

Edited by Ozanne
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Ozanne said:

It’s 2 weeks tomorrow we can start to socialise with a group of friends outside as well, if the reopening of schools doesn’t have much of an impact.  We are slowly but surely leaving lockdown which will hopefully be for the last time. 

That sounds ridiculously slow to me. Should allow rule of 6 from tomorrow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, StuMalinas said:

You mean I can meet one person for a picnic  outside, hardly unlocking is it Steve 

The schools are the biggie. They want to be sure that they can keep those open, so the other new freedoms are pretty inconsequential.

It's takes at about 2 weeks to see the impact of relaxations in the case numbers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, stuartbert two hats said:

The schools are the biggie. They want to be sure that they can keep those open, so the other new freedoms are pretty inconsequential.

It's takes at about 2 weeks to see the impact of relaxations in the case numbers.

Exactly. We'll see in the next week to 10 days if schools has. much of an impact which is why there is this extra gap till the rule of 6. Those 2 weeks will go really quickly and in the grand scheme of thing it isn't that long considering we are a year into the pandemic.

Edited by Ozanne
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, StuMalinas said:

0.28% positivity rate- yet we are still locked down what’s going on

Data not dates. See what effect the first phase of unlocking on monday has on that positivity rate. 

Then unlock more, see what the data does then unlock more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Ryan1984 said:

Should us in the UK be concerned about the amount of countries now suspending the AstraZeneca vaccine? @Toilet Duck?

It seems the right thing to do if there are genuine concerns but it seems odd they are not reflected in our roll out (so far).

Howdy, sorry, went out for a walk!

adverse effects reported in the UK aren’t showing the pattern being seen in Europe, so, it would seem to be fine. The problem we are having at the moment is an odd clustering of thromboembolism cases and in an age range that’s not typical (saying it’s no more prevalent in the general population is not the same as saying it’s no more prevalent in healthy people under 50, which is who this is occurring in and at a rate that is abnormal). Random stuff does cluster of course, it isn’t a fix when the lotto numbers are 1,2,3,4,5 & 6...but it makes people suspicious. The fact that they appear to be from the same batch of vaccine, makes it even more suspicious. I don’t know why there so much debate about this to be honest, it’s perfectly normal, this goes on when any new drug is used, it just isn’t reported on constantly so nobody knows about it. If it’s not random, then it’s possibly down to the manufacturing. The bottom line is that DIC has been a significant cause of mortality in Covid patients, so if this is a risk, then it is still lower than catching the disease. But, it means that post-administration monitoring can reduce the risks (we can look out for warning signs and do something about it early). There may also be other underlying reasons, and if we get to the bottom of it, then it helps safer use of the vaccine (or it could just be random, but clustered). Suggesting proper, safe use of a vaccine fuels anti-vax sentiment makes no sense to me. Those that really don’t want to take it, wont anyway. But if I were hesitant, I’d want to be reassured that it was being rolled out consistent with how we do for any new drug, which is exactly what is happening. The specific batch isn’t sitting in one location, it’s mixed in with other deliveries, so it would probably take just as long to separate them all out rather than pause and restart. They expect to start again by the end of the week here. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Chapple12345 said:

Pardon my ignorance... but surely if another wave doesn't lead to hospitalizations and deaths then this won't affect too much? 

It doesn't take much to tip the NHS into crisis mode - even a few alongside normal flu season being back and I do wonder what our response will be...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin
2 minutes ago, efcfanwirral said:

It doesn't take much to tip the NHS into crisis mode - even a few alongside normal flu season being back and I do wonder what our response will be...

I've checked out 4different hospitals in the last 3 weeks there's no feeling of a crisis.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, eFestivals said:

I've checked out 4different hospitals in the last 3 weeks there's no feeling of a crisis.

Data not dates only works one way though mate. It’s a joke.

Treating us like fools here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ive been flip flopping around on sticking with the schedule set out and accelerating (Probs due to burn out). Today it seems im feelings that lifting restrictions in June is far too late. As of today,

  • Deaths- 52
  • Hospitalisations- 534 
  • Total people in hospital due to COVID - 8029 (vs 12,889 & 20,993 in 01 March & 15 Feb respectively)

The numbers are in sky fall, don't see how it can be interpreted any other way. If it really is data, not dates. What data do we need to see for restrictions to be lifted faster? 

At this rate by Mid April with the weather turning and a major bump in vaccinations incoming  that we will see death in the 10-20 range and hospitalisations in the low 100s. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, eFestivals said:

I've checked out 4different hospitals in the last 3 weeks there's no feeling of a crisis.

Without much covid and flu it'll be fine now but we get these "NHS nearly at capacity" headlines each year with just the flu. I hope they are Tory paper exaggeration

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've generally been on the site of caution, but I've been reviewing the plan and it does seem really weird how long they're taking to ease the restrictions on informal outdoor meetings. Three families going to the park together is going to remain illegal for the next two months (+3 days).  That does seem pretty ridiculous.

The rest all seems fine though.

Edited by stuartbert two hats
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, aj6658 said:

Ive been flip flopping around on sticking with the schedule set out and accelerating (Probs due to burn out). Today it seems im feelings that lifting restrictions in June is far too late. As of today,

  • Deaths- 52
  • Hospitalisations- 534 
  • Total people in hospital due to COVID - 8029 (vs 12,889 & 20,993 in 01 March & 15 Feb respectively)

The numbers are in sky fall, don't see how it can be interpreted any other way. If it really is data, not dates. What data do we need to see for restrictions to be lifted faster? 

At this rate by Mid April with the weather turning and a major bump in vaccinations incoming  that we will see death in the 10-20 range and hospitalisations in the low 100s. 

 

What would you speed up and when?

 

Personally I don't think 14 weeks is all that long to wait, especially given the June deadline is relatively small in the amount of 'stuff' that starts to open so it's really only 9 weeks. 

But open to hearing how people here would open up faster and when?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...