Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

When will this shit end?


Chrisp1986

Recommended Posts

 

42 minutes ago, xxialac said:

Yet another days that just (just) dips under 1,000 deaths. Keeps happening.

Is it complete paranoia to think that the people in government responsible are delaying counting certain deaths so they can keep the number each day under the psychologically worse-sounding 1,000 number?

100% - confirmed by the PM saying "just under 1000 deaths" the other day

24 minutes ago, xxialac said:

The detail is being released at 6pm by a mainstream news outlet.

If there's one thing worse than incompetence it's trying to deny the public the truth.

Proper leakng and journalism - until they step on that (today - they'll have an order out to the media after this 6pm report and it'll be back to less official twitter leaks only) 

15 minutes ago, xxialac said:

I respect different views on this but for me a good economy is something to work on once only once you have low case numbers. You can no longer balance both when the case numbers are out of control.

I'm amazed we haven't had an eat IN to help out - to help those that can do takeaway only now. 

Edit - haha just realised I quoted you 3 times, didnt even notice! 

Edited by efcfanwirral
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, gigpusher said:

Yep my brother will be one of them. Diagnosed with oesophageal cancer. He waited 4 months of not feeling able to eat properly. I know he doesn't like going to the doctor but in normal times I am sure he wouldn't have waited that long. By the time he went it had spread too much. 

I know so many friends etc who have lost loved ones to cancer this year. 

That's terrible.  Really sorry to hear and I hope you are doing ok in the circumstances ☹

Link to comment
Share on other sites

...and yes the government had it hard the poor things...and I do feel a bit of sympathy with the tough choices they had back in March...but they had all summer to sort out the test and trace thing, and spent a hec of a lot of money on it...and to be fair the test thing was pretty good, but the trace part was useless....and here we are, in a right fuckin state.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, steviewevie said:

...and yes the government had it hard the poor things...and I do feel a bit of sympathy with the tough choices they had back in March...but they had all summer to sort out the test and trace thing, and spent a hec of a lot of money on it...and to be fair the test thing was pretty good, but the trace part was useless....and here we are, in a right fuckin state.

I always got the feeling they didn’t really take T&T seriously. Never really got why it was so important. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, xxialac said:

The government has evidently taken a 'wait and see' rather than 'be decisive' approach throughout the crisis.

And every fucking time it's been the wrong call. This Christmas was the final straw for me. 

They are absolutely to blame.

Extending the crisis has also damaged the economy as well as the health of the nation.

Lose-lose.

The crisis would be a long way from over even with a more competent Government. Look around Europe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Steveb72 said:

Just heard that my mum and dad are both getting their vacs this Saturday they are 72 and 74, so they seem to be moving down the list on getting people vaccinated.

Wow....hopefully not an insensitive question but do they have vulnerabilities other than age?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, ace56blaa said:

Yeah sorry, shouldn't have said shut up, 

Just tired of hearing the same talking points that made sense at the beginning of the pandemic like the Tories not having a crystal ball. Even though then they did have the benefit of seeing the effect on Italy and other countries before it was out of control here, they clearly were not going to make perfect decisions about the virus, as back then we knew very little about it. 

The crystal ball thing just comes across to me as parroting the same rhetoric that johnson himself does when calling Keir Starmer captain hindsight. 

Yes it's easier to point out governmental mistakes after the fact, but that is no longer what is happening, press, scientists and the general public, often see something coming, like the surge in infections at Universities or the U-turn on christmas mixing way before the government acts. Sometimes weeks or months before. 

It just seems like most of your arguments haven't changed to reflect the situation we are currently in and why we're in it. Like the whole eat out to help out thing, I'd be on the same page of your if the economy had recovered and the these businesses weren't closed now, but they are. 

Again sorry for saying shut up, not a healthy way to debate, but crystal ball? like what? You honestly think the government couldn't see most of this coming and just chose to ignore or hope it wouldn't, 

No worries. I think it's too simplistic to think the government (as a collective)  didn't see increases coming with things like the return to university they would have seen it and they would have felt they could mitigate the risk due to the ages of those getting infected not increasing the pressure on the hospitals. Due to the demographics involved. 

The rationale behind eat out to help out was make hay whilst the sun shines - we don't know how many businesses have survived this long because of that scheme at the time that decision was made we coped with any increase it brought about. When you judge the decisions in the context of the time they were made they haven't been disastrous in the grand scheme of things (unlike the nursing home decision). 

A friend of mine is convinced his business would have gone under without the tiers because it allowed him some time to open and make some money to make some bills. Now he is back under Tier 4 he is worried for his businesses future again. He will not be alone. 

Personally I think the biggest mistake they have made lately has been London and the South East avoiding T3 after the November lock down why this decision was made we'll probably never know and how much of this increase down there now is actually attributed to the new strain. The way people move around the capital cannot have helped - but as I've said hindsight is a wonderful thing. 

To all intents and purposes the country is in a November style lockdown we will see in the next few weeks if it's harsh enough or not.

Obviously there are a few areas that aren't the majority of which have been under T3 restrictions for a long time. Does this show that T3 is in fact the balancing point between the economy and controling the virus? Are the tiers about right and it's just how we are allocating the tiers that needs refining?

Decisions are made at a point in time based on the information and the situation at that point in time. They are then judged in the context of what we know now, not what we knew then. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...