Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

When will this shit end?


Chrisp1986

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, stuartbert two hats said:

Lots of different software written in different technologies at different times by different people covering lots of different kinds of user (some external to the NHS).

There have been attempts to solve this problem for decades, and it's likely they will continue for many, many years to come.

The NHS is just so big.

Imprivata onesign is used by a number of trust to do single sign on using the NHS card. 
 

NHS Scotland is working towards a single sign on using azure ad. 
 

there is progress but it’s slow. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Ozanne said:

The issue is that the clapping was essentially a meaningless gesture to promote on people’s social media, as when push came to shove and public sector workers pay was frozen hardly any of the people that clapped made a fuss at all. 

I agree 100% but to be fair, people were ‘anti-clap’* before it was announced that there would not be a pay rise so that couldn’t have been the reason.

 

*for want of a better term.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Ozanne said:

The issue is that the clapping was essentially a meaningless gesture to promote on people’s social media, as when push came to shove and public sector workers pay was frozen hardly any of the people that clapped made a fuss at all. 

The clap was not a Political (with a big P) gesture as many interpreted it to be. It was more of a small p political expression of people's innate desire to act in a communal manner when under threat as was the support for Capt. Tom with people coming together to support a communal enterprise. Another example would be the way that the Manchester community came together after the Arena bombing with the adoption of the Bee. These are all expressions of our humanity rather than our politics.  

As a species we have always had a need for communal acts, from the stone age gatherings at stone circles through to modern day sporting events, meeting up with your mates in a pub/club and ,yes, music festivals. This of course goes against the individualistic philosophy of many on the right of Politics who base this on the writings of Ayn Rand (whilst completely ignoring her atheism and belief in pro-choice) and elevate individuals above community - "there's no such thing as society" and regard communal enterprise such as the NHS, BBC and unions as an anathema. Unfortunately during this current crisis this government's natural individualistic tendency as stopped it taking the communal measures need until it was too late and too many members of society have been unable to put their belief in self before others to one side.

So, and back to the point, the clap was not a meaningless gesture but an expression of our need to come together which the government failed to build on. And yes, all those workers which we suddenly found out that we couldn't do without need to be rewarded but as we all know the rewards will end up in the hands of MDs, hedge fund mangers and friends of the government etc - in fact all those who nobody would ever clap for.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Losing my hair said:

The clap was not a Political (with a big P) gesture as many interpreted it to be. It was more of a small p political expression of people's innate desire to act in a communal manner when under threat as was the support for Capt. Tom with people coming together to support a communal enterprise. Another example would be the way that the Manchester community came together after the Arena bombing with the adoption of the Bee. These are all expressions of our humanity rather than our politics.  

As a species we have always had a need for communal acts, from the stone age gatherings at stone circles through to modern day sporting events, meeting up with your mates in a pub/club and ,yes, music festivals. This of course goes against the individualistic philosophy of many on the right of Politics who base this on the writings of Ayn Rand (whilst completely ignoring her atheism and belief in pro-choice) and elevate individuals above community - "there's no such thing as society" and regard communal enterprise such as the NHS, BBC and unions as an anathema. Unfortunately during this current crisis this government's natural individualistic tendency as stopped it taking the communal measures need until it was too late and too many members of society have been unable to put their belief in self before others to one side.

So, and back to the point, the clap was not a meaningless gesture but an expression of our need to come together which the government failed to build on. And yes, all those workers which we suddenly found out that we couldn't do without need to be rewarded but as we all know the rewards will end up in the hands of MDs, hedge fund mangers and friends of the government etc - in fact all those who nobody would ever clap for.

I agree with all those points and I think it’s a lovely thing to have happened as it appeared to bring people together and show support for key workers. However the area where I feel it falls short is when months later those key workers in the public sector are getting a pay freeze and most people that I saw publicising their clapping earlier on, now were quiet. It annoyed me as that’s when it appeared to be a feel good thing to upload to social media when it looked good (joining in with everyone on doorsteps clapping), but when it’s about the less glamorous Chancellors statement inflicting pay freezes it’s not something people wanted to talk about.

Those areas you mention are really good examples of people coming together to generate good outcomes from hardship however in this case I feel they started it then didn’t really carry it on when it was needed again. Admittedly some could have written to their MP but I’m not sure that was the case.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, crazyfool1 said:

It actually makes me think that all we (me )  are doing is guessing on the approval date and people genuinely have no idea when it might be ....despite hints from sources to the contrary ... 

Have you ha a test result yet? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, crazyfool1 said:

It actually makes me think that all we (me )  are doing is guessing on the approval date and people genuinely have no idea when it might be ....despite hints from sources to the contrary ... 

Its from reliable people that its this week. But its taking its bloody time. We need some good news and FAST

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, crazyfool1 said:

It actually makes me think that all we (me )  are doing is guessing on the approval date and people genuinely have no idea when it might be ....despite hints from sources to the contrary ... 

You’ve made a good point, people are thinking up their own dates (sometimes based on comments in the press) and are then disappointed when that date isn’t hit. It’s probably a good idea to not expect it on a certain date but have it in the back of yours minds that it is coming soon. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...