Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

When will this shit end?


Chrisp1986

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, steviewevie said:

you can almost forgive the government for fucking up back in March....but to fuck up again and not learn from mistakes?!

They'll get away with it too.

I can’t forgive them for March but yeah I get your point!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DeanoL said:

Or in other words, it was more for the people who were clapping than for those they were supposedly clapping for.

To some extent yes but I don't like your use of the word supposedly - they were doing both. They were clapping to show support for essential workers and particularly the NHS. But they were frightened and isolated and so partaking in a communal event with their neighbours once a week helped them through a difficult time. What they weren't doing was supporting a political agenda.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, steviewevie said:

I know no one gives a shit with everything else that is going on...but I don't think labour should be voting for this brexit deal tomorrow.

Tend to agree. Abstaining would appear to be the obvious answer. I suppose they would prefer to look decisive. Those working classes absolutely love a bit of Brexit don't they?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, stuartbert two hats said:

I've lost track, but if it was defeated - would that mean No Deal?

good question....chaos probably. But it won't be, ERG are supporting it...so why should labour? If they still cared that we would maintain workers and environmental rights then they would not vote for it, as this deal does not guarantee that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Homer said:

Tend to agree. Abstaining would appear to be the obvious answer. I suppose they would prefer to look decisive. Those working classes absolutely love a bit of Brexit don't they?

Haven’t people been moaning at Starmer for being indecisive? He’s now taking a stance which he believes is better than no deal. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, crazyfool1 said:

curfews prevent people going to other peoples houses in the evenings and definitely made a difference in France and Spain ... the fewer people that are mobile  the more obvious the ones that are become  .... schools definitely need to go now unfortunately but other things too ... this is ridiculous now 

 

edit ... see above post and who wears face masks outside amongst their measures 

The French and Spain curfews were just banning mixing after those times though right? You could still go outside for a walk. We already ban household mixing in tier 2 or higher anyway?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Homer said:

Tend to agree. Abstaining would appear to be the obvious answer. I suppose they would prefer to look decisive. Those working classes absolutely love a bit of Brexit don't they?

depends which working classes you talk to....most cities were very much pro remain and apparently they have working class in them too....but those shit holes that have been neglected for decades blamed all their shit on immigrants or whatever else they read in some scummy tory rag.

(had a few drinks, feeling angry).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Ozanne said:

Haven’t people been moaning at Starmer for being indecisive? He’s now taking a stance which he believes is better than no deal. 

What is Starmer's line on all this? 'It's crap but it's better than no deal?' I've been drunk and not watching the news for the past few days (it was really nice!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Ozanne said:

Haven’t people been moaning at Starmer for being indecisive? He’s now taking a stance which he believes is better than no deal. 

well, I think he's wrong...but I guess he wants to convince those brexity red wall voters that he's their man...time to take the majority of labour voters who voted remain for granted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Homer said:

Tend to agree. Abstaining would appear to be the obvious answer. I suppose they would prefer to look decisive. Those working classes absolutely love a bit of Brexit don't they?

if they know it won't be defeated surely the best call would be to oppose it .... and say that they know that it would get voted through and the no deal wouldn't be an option ... but they couldnt support it .... is that to complex ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, DeanoL said:

The French and Spain curfews were just banning mixing after those times though right? You could still go outside for a walk. We already ban household mixing in tier 2 or higher anyway?

Turns out not. Can only go out to walk the dog. Which frankly I think is ridiculous. Like a pets mental health matters more than a person’s ffs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, DeanoL said:

The French and Spain curfews were just banning mixing after those times though right? You could still go outside for a walk. We already ban household mixing in tier 2 or higher anyway?

we do yes .... but like everything no enforcement .... a curfew is more of an obvious deterrent 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, crazyfool1 said:

if they know it won't be defeated surely the best call would be to oppose it .... and say that they know that it would get voted through and the no deal wouldn't be an option ... but they couldnt support it .... is that to complex ?

Might be. Starmer's previous line of 'negotiate the deal then have a vote on it versus remain' was apparently too mindblowing for people to inderstand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, DeanoL said:

Turns out not. Can only go out to walk the dog. Which frankly I think is ridiculous. Like a pets mental health matters more than a person’s ffs.

I think under any lockdown they would still allow exercise outside, it would be frankly inhumane not to, I'm just not sure if they would allow seeing 1 other person as part of the rules 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, DeanoL said:

Turns out not. Can only go out to walk the dog. Which frankly I think is ridiculous. Like a pets mental health matters more than a person’s ffs.

Not saying human mental health isn't important, but it's very crucial for a lot of dog breeds' health to get walked regularly, ideally daily (and sometimes multiple times). It can have physical and mental effects on them a lot more acutely than if a human didn't go out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, DeanoL said:

Turns out not. Can only go out to walk the dog. Which frankly I think is ridiculous. Like a pets mental health matters more than a person’s ffs.

You could only go out  in Spain if you had a reason. My friend in Madrid was having to take her prescriptions with her when she went out for a walk (lives in a flat in Barcelona) in case the police stopped her.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, jannybruck said:

Not saying human mental health isn't important, but it's very crucial for a lot of dog breeds' health to get walked regularly, ideally daily (and sometimes multiple times). It can have physical and mental effects on them a lot more acutely than if a human didn't go out.

I'd quite like for someone to put a lead on me and take me out in the morning for a shit in the park.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, steviewevie said:

I'd quite like for someone to put a lead on me and take me out in the morning for a shit in the park.

Reminds me of a joke:

Why do dogs lick their 'bits'?

Because they can't make a fist.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Found it, it simply is at the toilets. 
    • Alkaline Trio 90 Barrington Levy 80 Basement Jaxx 120 Billy Bragg 100 Billy Ocean 100 The Black Keys 60 Carl Cox 100 Chase & Status 120 Chelsea Wolfe 80 CMAT 135  Confidence Man 150 MAX David Byrne 150 Disclosure 60 Everything Everything 110 Faithless 100 Fatboy Slim 100 Four Tet 130 Garbage 100 GOAT 105 Greentea Peng 120 Happy Mondays 80  Hollie Cook 90 Jorja Smith 100 José González 100 Joy Crookes 120 Judas Priest 70 Kasabian 50 Kneecap 120  Levellers 85 Linkin Park 90 Lorde 120 Madness 75 The Maccabees 105  Neck Deep 135 Nile Rodgers & Chic 100 Overmono 100 Pixies 5 (-10) The Prodigy 140 Pulp 150 MAX RAYE 100 Ren 10 Richard Ashcroft 100 Say She She 75 Scissor Sisters 120 Self Esteem 120 Skunk Anansie 100 Stereolab 120 The Streets 110 Super Furry Animals 110 Thundercat 90 Tom Jones 30  Tyler, the Creator 60 Underworld 115 Wet Leg 90 Wilco 85  The Wombats 80 Wolf Alice 150 MAX
    • I mean she's never going to admit it, but of course she would do a deal...same as Labour would with lib-dems/greens if meant getting into government.
    • They probably do make more from the festival. But take a look at an aerial photo from any year - there's always a few fields that would be viable for festival related use yet are left empty. I guess they just don't want to deal with the associated hassle.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...