Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

When will this shit end?


Chrisp1986

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, Punksnotdead said:

Looks like the Christmas truce is well and truly over on here!

Peace on earth and goodwill to all men only lasts about 72 hours these days! 🙂

It’s still ongoing, just because one person went for someone doesn’t change that. Everyone else is being civil and lovely 😃

Edited by Ozanne
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, fraybentos1 said:

I was just waiting for you to show up ...

How would you suggest I more politely bring up the fact the guy is moaning about people being allowed to fly in and out the country while he himself is flying to Europe? There’s no delicate way to say it - the guys a hypocrite plain and simple. 

You could stop doing it? Jamie obviously felt conflicted about that trip all along and has otherwise been entirely consistent. He even deferred his university place a second year to avoid the virus. It doesn't add anything to the discussion to bring up the Germany trip.

Play the ball, not the man, and be kind. There's nothing put on about his anxiety.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, BobWillis said:

Blaming the government for you deciding to go on holiday during a pandemic is a bit of a stretch. 
Just because you’re allowed to do something doesn’t mean you can’t make your own judgments. 

I guess everyone is making judgement calls based on personal circumstances and moments in time .... looking back maybe my judgement to eat out help out once was maybe wrong and a mistake ... we are all learning during this ... Now obviously I and we know more so id make a different call 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, stuartbert two hats said:

You could stop doing it? Jamie obviously felt conflicted about that trip all along and has otherwise been entirely consistent. He even deferred his university place a second year to avoid the virus. It doesn't add anything to the discussion to bring up the Germany trip.

Play the ball, not the man, and be kind. There's nothing put on about his anxiety.

Spot on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, fraybentos1 said:

I was just waiting for you to show up ...

How would you suggest I more politely bring up the fact the guy is moaning about people being allowed to fly in and out the country while he himself is flying to Europe? There’s no delicate way to say it - the guys a hypocrite plain and simple. 

all you do is moan about people moaning.

Prick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Think the Glastonbury spirit is wearing off some people because they haven’t been for so long and it might be a while until they go again.

try and be nice, try to have empathy, you don’t always have to try and highlight people’s mistakes or opinions which don’t match your own. You can keep those thoughts to yourself and try and post positive messages and increase the mood rather than drag it down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, stuartbert two hats said:

You could stop doing it? Jamie obviously felt conflicted about that trip all along and has otherwise been entirely consistent. He even deferred his university place a second year to avoid the virus. It doesn't add anything to the discussion to bring up the Germany trip.

Play the ball, not the man, and be kind. There's nothing put on about his anxiety.

He felt so concerned about the trip that he chose to go on and now he says he’s concerned about the open border policy the gov has? Sorry that is ridiculous and unrealistic.

I’ve not even called out the guy for choosing to go abroad it’s the hypocrisy it’s followed with which is infuriating.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Ozanne said:

Just stop going for people, have a look at your posts nearly all of them are going for people for something they do or don’t do on here. You do it quite frequently and can seem quite personal at times. It’s against the spirit of Glastonbury and simply isn’t very nice.

I’m not going to say anymore and derail the thread but take a look at your posts for a minute and you’ll see most of them are criticising people. 

So you have no issue with someone going abroad during the pandemic then moaning that the government is allowing people to go abroad during the pandemic? 

This forum is insane at times lol. Some of the strictest people I’ve ever heard when it comes to stopping the Spread of the virus but apparently no one has an issue with that.
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, crazyfool1 said:

I guess everyone is making judgement calls based on personal circumstances and moments in time .... looking back maybe my judgement to eat out help out once was maybe wrong and a mistake ... we are all learning during this ... Now obviously I and we know more so id make a different call 

I don’t really have an issue with anyone going abroad, if I could have afforded it I would have gone on holiday this summer too. 
But blaming the government for allowing it is a poor excuse. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, BobWillis said:

I don’t really have an issue with anyone going abroad, if I could have afforded it I would have gone on holiday this summer too. 
But blaming the government for allowing it is a poor excuse. 

so you dont think we have been miss sold anything ? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, fraybentos1 said:

So you have no issue with someone going abroad during the pandemic then moaning that the government is allowing people to go abroad during the pandemic? 

This forum is insane at times lol. Some of the strictest people I’ve ever heard when it comes to stopping the Spread of the virus but apparently no one has an issue with that.
 

I think closing the borders is a dumb idea. But Jamie is clearly just talking through his anxiety. I think its fair to point out that you think he's being hypocritical but people are entitled to their separate opinions on it, and i don't think its massively an issue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, crazyfool1 said:

so you dont think we have been miss sold anything ? 

Meh. People knew travelling abroad during a pandemic is a bad idea. They took the view the individual benefit outweighed the individual risk. Which Is fair enough, but people need to take some personal responsibility for that decision

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, zahidf said:

I think closing the borders is a dumb idea. But Jamie is clearly just talking through his anxiety. I think its fair to point out that you think he's being hypocritical but people are entitled to their separate opinions on it, and i don't think its massively an issue.

It's not an opinion, it's just an outright fact. The only reason it's become an issue is because some of the  usual sensitive folks on this thread get upset by it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, zahidf said:

Meh. People knew travelling abroad during a pandemic is a bad idea. They took the view the individual benefit outweighed the individual risk. Which Is fair enough, but people need to take some personal responsibility for that decision

And then not come on here and say how bad the government allowing foreign travel is after they've been abroad themselves...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, fraybentos1 said:

It's not an opinion, it's just an outright fact. The only reason it's become an issue is because some of the  usual sensitive folks on this thread get upset by it.

Are you ok? You’ve gone for a couple of people in this thread in the last week, I’m concerned you aren’t doing well. If things are getting too much take a step back. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...