Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

When will this shit end?


Chrisp1986

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, crazyfool1 said:

Boris can’t be the leaker ... he didn’t even make the cobra meeting !!  Must have had another more pressing need !! 

It was always between Gove and Cummings (He's still in the mix just behind the scenes until mid Dec)

It's bloody obvious but we can't finger point.. they know what they are doing :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Chapple12345 said:

They've essentially given hope to low infection areas and then pulled the rug right from underneath them.

Just imagine how happy we are here in Midlothian, when last week we were told we were going down a tier, only to be told "na, jokes" less than a day before the move was due to come into effect. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Feel some sympathy for Sturgeon. She knows this whole Christmas thing is a bonkers decision but that going solo against rUK would be a bad look. I think she should've been stronger though, polls show her concerns are in line with the majority of the public mood.

Edited by SwedgeAntilles
Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, mcshed said:

Just imagine how happy we are here in Midlothian, when last week we were told we were going down a tier, only to be told "na, jokes" less than a day before the move was due to come into effect. 

I feel for you! I'm in Norfolk which has been faring okay since the start and was in tier 1 till before lockdown so I can see there being some resistance if we were placed under the tougher restrictions, I get it would be for the greater good but much like the aforementioned Cornwall I don't think placing us in the same tier as somewhere like Liverpool which has much higher rates would be a popular decision 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, FestivalJamie said:

The issue is if your area is tier 1 and surrounding areas are tier 2, there’s a risk of massive influx of people from surrounding areas bringing in and spreading higher levels of the virus and bringing rates up in Colchester too.

The Tier 2 policy does say to 'avoid travelling outside your area', so we can only hope that people follow that instruction.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, parsonjack said:

Tiers haven't been announced yet obvs but do we know how frequently they will be reviewed so as to move areas into higher/lower etc.  Is it possible that we could start off in Tier 2, but be in Tier 1 before Christmas?

It's possible, but maybe unlikely as they will want to keep the numbers down as much as poss before the 5 day christmas thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Homer said:

I've got to say, sodding off abroad somewhere quiet with the wife for a week or so really is starting to seem like the sensible option! We can always go to Bristol for Easter or whenever.

Exactly my thoughts. Tier 2 effectively shuts all of the proper boozers in my little town and leaves us with Spoons for the Christmas period. 

What a pisstake that that absolute shit bucket can stay open but all the local pubs have to close. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, FestivalJamie said:

Apologies @kingbadgerI’ve just taken a further look and the rate In Colchester is actually 54.7/100,000 over a 7 day incidence.

This I believe is genuinely low enough to justify tier 1 restrictions, so we will see what happens.

The issue is if your area is tier 1 and surrounding areas are tier 2, there’s a risk of massive influx of people from surrounding areas bringing in and spreading higher levels of the virus and bringing rates up in Colchester too.

Isn't that sort of the point of doing it regionally rather than just at the Local Level? And the reason that things like gigs aren't allowed irrespective of your level? You might get a handful of people who can't be bothered to go to the effort of traveling to different areas but it's not like one tier is normal and the rest aren't. They are all fairly limiting. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TheFullShaboo said:

Exactly my thoughts. Tier 2 effectively shuts all of the proper boozers in my little town and leaves us with Spoons for the Christmas period. 

What a pisstake that that absolute shit bucket can stay open but all the local pubs have to close. 

 

Is that right? How have they swung that? Because they serve food? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Homer said:

Is that right? How have they swung that? Because they serve food? 

Im making assumptions, but yeah, there isn't a single pub in my town that serves 'substantial meals' bar the Wetherspoons.

(There may be a couple but they're not what i would refer to as the 'proper pubs') 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Homer said:

Is that right? How have they swung that? Because they serve food? 

Think of them and any other pub that serves food as a restaurant for the purposes of this - you cant got and order a bowl of chips and 15 pints.

Edited by RobertProsineckisLighter
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, RobertProsineckisLighter said:

Think of them and any other pub that serves food as a restaurant for the purposes of this - you can go and order a bowl of chips and 15 pints.

That's my Xmas Day present to the wife sorted then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, RobertProsineckisLighter said:

Isn't that sort of the point of doing it regionally rather than just at the Local Level? And the reason that things like gigs aren't allowed irrespective of your level? You might get a handful of people who can't be bothered to go to the effort of traveling to different areas but it's not like one tier is normal and the rest aren't. They are all fairly limiting. 

Gigs are allowed in Tier 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, SwedgeAntilles said:

Feel some sympathy for Sturgeon. She knows this whole Christmas thing is a bonkers decision but that going solo against rUK would be a bad look. I think she should've been stronger though, polls show her concerns are in line with the majority of the public mood.

This was my point last night in a way, but I think if she had those valid concerns then she could’ve put a block in Scotland doing it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Ozanne said:

This was my point last night in a way, but I think if she had those valid concerns then she could’ve put a block in Scotland doing it?

She certainly could have, but that would have meant going it alone, and until now the devolved nations have done a pretty good job of staying aligned even when England has decided to do it's own thing. Even if it's against her better judgement it would be a difficult message to give to Scotland that everyone else in the UK will be doing something different for Christmas but they just need to suck it up.

That being said, my close family back home is exactly three households (my parents, 1 set of aunt and uncle and 1 more aunt) who always usually spend Christmas together. They're were all pretty vocal on Facebook last night that they think the whole idea is mental and will be continuing to isolate as normal despite the easing of restrictions. If my aunt who lives alone is so strong in taking that view it's difficult to see who this benefits.

Edited by SwedgeAntilles
autocorrect
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin
6 hours ago, shoptildrop said:

Also with this everyone is in Tier 2 or 3 my opinion this is to show success when they move any area into Tier 1 so they can shout about it

Easy wins for places with low numbers and makes gov look good... yes I'm cynical 😑

yeah, you've about nailed it.

And in theory everywhere will eventually move to tier one as the vaccine gets rolled out - which will also probably be used for ending restrictions, too.

Don't get too hung up on the infection rates in an area tho, as what tier will depend on hospital demand as well as infection rate - and because of the vaccine in a month or two we might see infection rates going up while hospital demand is falling.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Surely the main reason they won't put anyone in tier 1 is because of this Christmas stuff? They're trying to keep infections down as much as possible to allow for that five days. If people want to do that then there has to be some sacrifices (I know not everybody does and would rather be in a lower tier instead, but to me everything done in the run-up is being done with Christmas mitigation in mind). 

I actually thought there was a strong possibility they might just extend the current lockdown until Christmas, so if anything I'm surprised they're going as light as they are.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, parsonjack said:

They're not saying so but is Boris taking a gamble that infection rates and consequent admissions and deaths due to greater mixing at Christmas will be offset by a lot of the most vulnerable being vaccinated by then?

I still think the most vulnerable need to make their own decisions on gatherings, and weigh up the risk vs reward for their own personal situation. Whilst they may now be permitted to mix, it doesn’t mean it is  safe to do so. 
If you have a medical condition or are over 70 then in my opinion you should probably have Christmas at home this year regardless.

 

Edited by st dan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does anyone else's parent's literally not give a s**t about the virus or taking precautions?

Not to say my parents are going mental and breaking all the rules as to be honest even in "normal" times their life's wouldn't be doing so but they just have a general disregard to the dangers the virus could pose them (both mid 60's)

Last Saturday they turned up at our house and let themselves in for instance without batting an eyelid. I literally had to tell them to leave. We eventually settled on speaking to them as they stood in our back garden and we stood at the entrance to our back doors (yes breaking the rule but better than them being in the house)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...