Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Pangea


tumbles

Recommended Posts

47 minutes ago, The60ftOctopus said:

I think the base structure might be the Earth? The moon will definitely be hanging from the crane. 

It shouldn't be a hazard if it spins very slowly and doesn't carry heavy goods? The year off has done Glastonbury wonders for this year.

You generally don't allow people to stand/work underneath a suspended load so the area below will have to be cordoned off, I'd imagine that would be quite a large area if the crane were to move during the performance. 

 

Would help with the crowd though I guess, to stop people bunching up around on side 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Homer said:

I'm oblivious - still looks like... a crane to me. Looking forward to seeing it in action on Friday night.

Yeah I'm struggling to work out whats going on. I have a feeling it might be utterly mindblowing or completely shit. 

All that talk of the radome - surely that wee green football on the base of the crane isn't a radome. I thought it would be maybe hung from the crane and enclose the arena bit or something. As I say I'm struggling to work out what might even be possible or planned from the pics. 

The symbol on the map definitely suggests the crane will move around in an orbit but cant see it being allowed over people's heads

Edited by gherkin8r
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If they can get away with three jcb digger arms hanging above the crowd with acrobats swooping down and picking people up out the crowd im sure a crane is fine 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, gherkin8r said:

Yeah I'm struggling to work out whats going on. I have a feeling it might be utterly mindblowing or completely shit. 

All that talk of the radome - surely that wee green football on the base of the crane isn't a radome. I thought it would be maybe hung from the crane and enclose the arena bit or something. As I say I'm struggling to work out what might even be possible or planned from the pics. 

The symbol on the map definitely suggests the crane will move around in an orbit but cant see it being allowed over people's heads

Arcadia said on there facebook page the green football is not the radome. Also confirmed fire etc and that what they do best is 'take over the sky'

They also state visuals by astral projekt. The link shown earlier in this thread looks pretty impressive

I have every faith in them doing something pretty spectacular. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Adam75 said:

Arcadia said on there facebook page the green football is not the radome. Also confirmed fire etc and that what they do best is 'take over the sky'

They also state visuals by astral projekt. The link shown earlier in this thread looks pretty impressive

I have every faith in them doing something pretty spectacular. 

 

This.

Also, they did say that the project would evolve over the coming years, so any judgement shouldn't be based on this first incarnation alone.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Fork_UK said:

This.

Also, they did say that the project would evolve over the coming years, so any judgement shouldn't be based on this first incarnation alone.  

No way, I'm set in judging it before I have seen it or even know what it is. 

Load of shite. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, The60ftOctopus said:

I think the base structure might be the Earth? The moon will definitely be hanging from the crane. 

It shouldn't be a hazard if it spins very slowly and doesn't carry heavy goods? The year off has done Glastonbury wonders for this year.

To me, this makes sense with the 'footprint' given on the map.

Screenshot 2019-06-24 at 15.09.38.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, The60ftOctopus said:

The year off has done Glastonbury wonders for this year.

Absolutely this.

My first Boomtown last year and, acknowledging that the whole build philosophy is very much central to Boomtown's USP, there were times when I found myself thinking that maybe Glastonbury just isn't trying hard enough in some aspects of the festival. Then Pangea is born, I sneak a look at IICON and I think "nicely done GFL. A fallow well spent...".

Ben

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It does look very underwhelming and... ugly to be fair! Do we think they’re gonna cover the structures somehow or just leave it bare as it is? I wouldn’t worry if there was a week left for them to finish it off, but I don’t think 2 days is anywhere near enough time to pimp it up. I hope Im wrong!

Edited by Jay89
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, autoinflate said:

I'm prepared to be convinced this is a good addition....but right now it looks exactly like what it is, a dockyard crane, and a big fkn ugly one at that.

Change my mind Arcadia!

 

Should be ok if there are lasers 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks like the earth/rotating moon is bang on. Quote from Emily on NME:

"“I would say the new structure for Arcadia. It’s called Pangea, and it’s an enormous crane that you can see from pretty much the entire site. It’s quite crazy and hard to describe, but it’s going to carry a moon and circumnavigate the Earth which is at the base of the tower. It’s going to have fire and music. You know, a whole line-up of brilliant music and classic Arcadia pyro as well.”
 

https://www.nme.com/music-interviews/emily-eavis-tells-us-expect-glastonbury-2019-2513488#t0oZpuFeEbj39kxe.99

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, autoinflate said:

"An enormous crane that you can see from pretty much the entire site."

Bit like a building site then? But with lasers...

 

Maybe that why it only starts at 10pm, use the darkness to hide the structure

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Adam75 said:

Maybe that why it only starts at 10pm, use the darkness to hide the structure

I think you’re right. At night, with the moon and earth lit up it will look pretty awesome! In the day time not so much!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...