Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

2019 Headliners


rzwodezwo

Recommended Posts

I’m staying with mates in Glastonbury. Going to walk the site later, and up the tor. I’ll post some pics.

 

Am fairly confident that the pics should start a debate about how the exact conditions underfoot effect our chances come T-day; mutating eventuallly into a discussion about the odds of The Strokes being announced as a surprise ‘fourth’ headliner.

 

It is almost October after all.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, kalifire said:

AM / Macca / The Cure

Doesn’t work for me. There’s just nobody properly exciting on that list. Macca is definitely the star booking there and would provide the big Glasto moment, but that set of headliners leaves me cold. 

 

Regardless of taste, it’s a strong trio.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

5 hours ago, kalifire said:

AM / Macca / The Cure

Doesn’t work for me. There’s just nobody properly exciting on that list. Macca is definitely the star booking there and would provide the big Glasto moment, but that set of headliners leaves me cold. 

Me neither, I like the option to see one band headline the pyramid stage each time but this year is kinda flat. I was kinda hoping at bit more after a fallow year too. 

I know they other stages will make up for it, two of the best acts ive seen while going were at West holts, Funkadelic/Sly and Eearth Wind and Fire. I can't imagine choosing to see Kanye or cold play over them haha

Edited by Xeph1995
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, kalifire said:

AM / Macca / The Cure

Doesn’t work for me. There’s just nobody properly exciting on that list. Macca is definitely the star booking there and would provide the big Glasto moment, but that set of headliners leaves me cold. 

We don’t know it is that trio. Could be different.

Edited by RarerThanDandyB
Spelling
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, kalifire said:

AM / Macca / The Cure

Doesn’t work for me. There’s just nobody properly exciting on that list. Macca is definitely the star booking there and would provide the big Glasto moment, but that set of headliners leaves me cold. 

I totally agree. I like The Cure, but not convinced them or Macca being announced will get the same excitement in the wider public that they get on here. No wow factor, maybe we've become too accustomed for the bookers to deliver something that incites debate wether someone should headline that makes that trio seem bland.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Xeph1995 said:

Id absloutely love to see QOTSA headline, I really think they are good enough and big enough. They also put on a killer show. I doubt its gunna happen next year but i hope so soon. 

I could absolutely see this being a pyramid stage moment. 

 

 

Definitely agree, great back catalogue, charismatic front man, and (from what I've seen) they put on a quality show!

I'm always surprised R+L haven't given them a proper headlining slot instead of a pointless co-headline

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QOTSA aren't a Glasto headliner in a million years. Have seen them a load of times, 7 or 8, over the last 15 years and sad to say they rarely deliver. They were bang average at Mad Cool in July. Wiped off the face of the earth by Depeche Mode and Nine Inch Nails who played after them. Men and boys. Night and day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/25/2018 at 6:03 PM, ivan said:

Yes but you have to appreciate that the BBC put a few quid into the Glasto pot and they will want decent viewing figures for their input

Obviously the likes of Coldplay , Foo's and Adele will give em that , risking it with Pale Waves won't.

My mate has been saying for years The Pyramid is too BBC audience friendly !

Yeah I understand the risk factor and viewing figures side of things. It's a shame that the BBC audience should hold so much sway over the festival and who appears on the Pyramid etc. Like someone else said on here a few pages ago - and I agree - people at home and new punters are getting used to these absolutely MASSIVE bands and it feels like it's all getting a bit insatiable. Just my opinion tho.
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, Xeph1995 said:

Id absloutely love to see QOTSA headline, I really think they are good enough and big enough. They also put on a killer show. I doubt its gunna happen next year but i hope so soon. 

I could absolutely see this being a pyramid stage moment. 

 

 

Would love this too. For my money, they're better than Foos - although prob not more popular. A solid Friday night headliner on the Pyramid definitely.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, MEGATRONICMEATWAGON said:

Yeah I understand the risk factor and viewing figures side of things. It's a shame that the BBC audience should hold so much sway over the festival and who appears on the Pyramid etc. Like someone else said on here a few pages ago - and I agree - people at home and new punters are getting used to these absolutely MASSIVE bands and it feels like it's all getting a bit insatiable. Just my opinion tho.
 

It's worth pointing out that despite the BBC's massive influence on the headliners being something "everyone knows", there's not that much actual evidence that they have much of a say. It might be something the organisers consider, but I've never heard of any occasions when the beeb has made or vetoed any of the festivals decisions with regards to headliners.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, stuartbert two hats said:

It's worth pointing out that despite the BBC's massive influence on the headliners being something "everyone knows", there's not that much actual evidence that they have much of a say. It might be something the organisers consider, but I've never heard of any occasions when the beeb has made or vetoed any of the festivals decisions with regards to headliners.

Agreed, might have been more relevant years ago but I still think the beeb are still very much second fiddle to what the festival wants to do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...