Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Gorillaz


gmb1992

Recommended Posts

  • 1 year later...

Posted over in the OS thread but thought might as well put here as well. New track incoming on the 30th of this month featuring Slowthai and Slaves. Not sure if this means they’re gearing up an album and tour again, but if so I think they must be a good contender for one of our missing Other headliners, namely the Sunday. Ten years since they headlined (fits Emily’s comment), and Damon obviously loves the place.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, FloorFiller said:

Posted over in the OS thread but thought might as well put here as well. New track incoming on the 30th of this month featuring Slowthai and Slaves. Not sure if this means they’re gearing up an album and tour again, but if so I think they must be a good contender for one of our missing Other headliners, namely the Sunday. Ten years since they headlined (fits Emily’s comment), and Damon obviously loves the place.

Doesn't one of their headline sets get a lot of shit on here? I thought they were ace at Boomtown in 2018. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Sasperella said:

Doesn't one of their headline sets get a lot of shit on here? I thought they were ace at Boomtown in 2018. 

Yeah, they were a late stand in for U2, and Damon obviously knew he had to put on a real show (especially after having been there with Blur the following year) and packed the set with all the special guests from their newest album, but alas it was all a bit thrown together and that new album wasn’t exactly packed full of bangers. Picked up right at the end when they played their more well known songs, but overall I found it pretty damn underwhelming, as did a lot of people.

Not that that would stop him bringing them back to Glastonbury. In fact I’m sure he’d jump at the chance for a second shot. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, MEGABOWL said:

Their 2010 set went under a bit. It’s excruciating watching Albarn trying to get a singalong going during Pirate Jet. Can’t imagine he would would want to put himself through that again. 

Big difference headlining the Pyramid to headlining Other. Pyramid crowds are packed full of people just there for the hell of it and waiting to be entertained. Other crowds are full of people actually wanting to see the act on stage. Doubt they’d have close to the same problems, plus they’d be considerably more rehearsed and not a late stand in. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Hugh Jass said:

I thought Damon was touring some other project April/May this year? I’d be surprised to see him bounce straight from that into Gorillaz again.

Last time they took to the stage under prepared and under rehearsed...

Looks like he's touring that up until mid June. Would be very tight to go from that to rehearsing and playing with Gorillaz at the end of June but I suppose if anyone's going to do that it's him.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, kingcrawler said:

Looks like he's touring that up until mid June. Would be very tight to go from that to rehearsing and playing with Gorillaz at the end of June but I suppose if anyone's going to do that it's him.

 

I’d say we’re more likely to see this on the farm than Gorillaz.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, MEGABOWL said:

Their 2010 set went under a bit. It’s excruciating watching Albarn trying to get a singalong going during Pirate Jet. Can’t imagine he would would want to put himself through that again. 

He's done lots of successful gigs with the band since, where he didn't try to get a singsong going with a slow track from brand new album. And the crowd will be better at Other anyway.

I loved the 2010 gig, I'd had Plastic Beach on repeat since it came out and Demon Days was my favourite record of that decade. I didn't get about lack of engagement with the crowd, I was there for the music.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, stuartbert two hats said:

He's done lots of successful gigs with the band since, where he didn't try to get a singsong going with a slow track from brand new album. And the crowd will be better at Other anyway.

I loved the 2010 gig, I'd had Plastic Beach on repeat since it came out and Demon Days was my favourite record of that decade. I didn't get about lack of engagement with the crowd, I was there for the music.

I enjoyed watching it on the TV after (was at Flaming Lips) and he threw the kitchen sink at it but it did seem to fall flat with the crowd.  And in terms of being a big headliner you need either crowd interaction or a load of big hits (or both). I agree with you and @FloorFiller, an Other set would suit them better. But when he can play the Big G with so many of his other projects, or if he really wants to, headline again with Blur, he'd really have to be in a 'ripping plasters off' kind of mood to retread that ground.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Comfy Bean said:

To be fair, the Thatcher thing would probably happen 😞 

I'm having a really bad day here, coming home on a recovery vehicle. This doesn't help my cells. I'm worried I'm gonna get home to the news revealing Thatcher has been resurrected. Shit I'm gonna need a drink. 😉

Anyhow the gorrilaz put on a good show at boomtown and I'd be there with bells on. 

If I was going.😥

FFS. I'm definitely going for a pint. 😜

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not like he doesn't know how to engage with a crowd, he was going this kind of austere, art presentation and it didn't connect. The more recent gigs have been nothing like that.

But I agree, it doesn't look likely. It's not like Gorillas are a band like Blur or Radiohead that are halfway to being gig ready by virtue of being in the studio - a Gorillaz tune can just be Damon and a random collaborator on an iPad. They're not coming back this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, dentalplan said:

From that post, I would guess that he's not doing festivals with this project if he's 'celebrating Roskilde Festival' in a theatre in Copenhagen rather than at Roskilde Festival.

Is he “celebrating Roskilde” in all the other places he’s playing?

Given his history and relationship with the festival I find it incomprehensible that he won’t show up somewhere in some capacity. Whether that’s guesting with someone else or bringing a project of his own. Given that he’s touring the Icelandic fountain thing it seems the most likely rather than dusting off Gorillaz or Blur at short notice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Hugh Jass said:

Is he “celebrating Roskilde” in all the other places he’s playing?

Given his history and relationship with the festival I find it incomprehensible that he won’t show up somewhere in some capacity. Whether that’s guesting with someone else or bringing a project of his own. Given that he’s touring the Icelandic fountain thing it seems the most likely rather than dusting off Gorillaz or Blur at short notice.

No, of course he isn't, but he's only playing concert halls with that project so far. And he is 'celebrating' Roskilde - a festival he appears at more often than he does Glastonbury - in Copenhagen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...