Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎


Acid_Haze

Recommended Posts

If, and it's a big If, the Roses finally get their arse in gear in the next year, I'd be surprised if it wasn't them. They'd obviously tour any new album, would be looking for exposure from the BBC (unlike the reunion gigs where they weren't pushing anything), and have unfinished business at Glastonbury.

Swear there were rumours early last month that they are back off (although currently unannounced)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 37.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • FloorFiller

    1190

  • Rose-Colored Boy

    1060

  • Matt42

    1040

  • eFestivals

    1008

Tinie Tempah is a rapper (and if it's sarcasm, I just think it would make the best flow)... And I enjoy Tinie Tempah. He's got enjoyable songs and gets a crowd going. I think I'd personally enjoy him more than any of the subs this year tbh.

I was more poking fun at the idea that you have to have a rapper on before a rapper. Bobbins. Seems contrived, and suggests that rap doesn't sit well with other genres. Dizzee played before the Arctics, Amy Winehouse played before Jay Z, the ruddy Wu Tang Clan played straight after Two Door Cinema Club. Obviously I'm not suggesting you go from First Aid Kit to Public Enemy, but rappers don't always have to travel in pairs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd put some money on Noel Gallagher headlining the Other stage next year.

Hmm, I think he'd be more likely to sub the Pyramid if he played. Maybe something like

Muse

Two Door Cinema Club

Fleetwood Mac

Noel Gallagher

Florence + the Machine

The Vaccines

Not really any obvious subs bar Noel for me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

PEARL JAM ......youve had Metalica

FLEETWOOD i hope

DEP MODE ............playing all the favs

Can't see this happening. When was the last time there were three headliners that were this old? 2009 was close but even then Blur were coming back from a long hiatus.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I got my way, with it still being fairly realistic, we'd have:

Friday: Muse, Black Rebel Motorcycle Club

Saturday: AC/DC, Primal Scream

Sunday: Kanye West, Tinie Tempah

The Kinks in the legends slot.

Those subs are a bit wacky. BRMC would struggle to sub John Peel, Tinie would no longer be big enough and Primal Scream only did it last year and are probably pretty scarred by the experience.

Give me:

Foo Fighters subbed by Flo & Machine

Kanye West subbed by The Roots

Fleetwood Mac

...and I'll be happy, although I think The Roots are an incredibly long shot and more likely to headline Other.

They'd be massively unlikely to do either. They were about four down on the Bestival mainstage last year whereas your other subheadliner has headlined it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd love for The Cure to break their mixed relationship with Glastonbury. It could happen next year if they actually bother to release a new album/do more trilogy type shows. They've had a little break from the UK festival seen now after showing everyone what they could do in 2011/12 to universal acclaim

Realistically I think:

Fleetwood Mac
Muse
Someone that will be somewhat surprising like Metallica this year.

There are quite a few artists that are only an album or two away from being close to headlining if Eavis is desperate. Florence, Two Door, Vampire Weekend, Bombay Bicycle Club or even The Vaccines. Are all of these that much smaller than Coldplay were in 2002 or Arctic Monkeys in 2007?

Edited by beau1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

They'd be massively unlikely to do either. They were about four down on the Bestival mainstage last year whereas your other subheadliner has headlined it.

You're probably right, if only in terms of UK recognition. That's a great shame, though. I can't think of any other hip hop band - a proper band - who have as much longevity or credibility as The Roots. Maybe a West Holts headliner?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're probably right, if only in terms of UK recognition. That's a great shame, though. I can't think of any other hip hop band - a proper band - who have as much longevity or credibility as The Roots. Maybe a West Holts headliner?

That'd be a good fit. Surprised it's not happened already actually.

Really? I've always thought BRMC were quite big... Tinie, I'd say would be (provided he keeps featuring on songs), and I guess you could be right about Primals, but didn't they headline Other in 2012, then sub Pyramid in 2013?

Plus, it was just what I'd like, still with it being fairly realistic.

They were but it's been a while now. Over ten years since they were around that level.

Tinie's star seems to be fading now. His arena tour bombed and I think he's already sliding back down festival lineups. If there is a hip hop sub I wouldn't be too surprised by Macklemore & Ryan Lewis. It'd be unbelievably shit but people seem to like that stuff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fleetwood mac (didn't Neil say Arcade fire were the replacement for them this year and they would be on the Friday?)

Noel Gallagher

Radiohead (possibly a live return)

Florence

Kanye

Morrissey (hadn't thought of him good shout)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

*CoughCoughCoughMetallicaCoughCouchCough*

Was waiting for that!

Nah Metallica have a relatively wide range of tunes. A lot of chugging on E granted but for a metal band, they're actually quite diverse.

All AC/DCs tunes - apart from the very odd tune like Ride On or Big Balls - are basically three minutes long with three chords.

Was a big fan until I saw them live and was bored shitless after 7-8 tunes. And that was after being ecstatic for the first half hour having looked forward to the gig for months.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fewer power-ballads in the Dacker repertoire, I'll grant you.

What they probably have in their favour is a wider selection of widely recognised numbers - whereas Metallica only really have Enter Sandman, more of AC/DC's set will be pretty familiar to the casual observer. At least, if they lay off the new material.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fewer power-ballads in the Dacker repertoire, I'll grant you.

What they probably have in their favour is a wider selection of widely recognised numbers - whereas Metallica only really have Enter Sandman, more of AC/DC's set will be pretty familiar to the casual observer. At least, if they lay off the new material.

True. And theyd be a great booking. They have 6 or 7 tunes that would tear the place apart. Theyre great fun. Certainly guaranteed a bigger crowd than Metallica.

Looks like any shows will be without Malcolm though.

Edited by The Nal
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...