Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

OASIS?


Guest daviesjack

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 445
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I have mixed feelings about this. On one hand, I'd quite like to see Oasis, although I'm not even sure why. On the other hand, they really piss me off and from what I've seen/heard are shit live anyway.

Time will tell. In the 3 years I've gone, I've never found myself spending so much time wondering who on earth one of the headliners could be. I quite like it, it's exciting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sod 'em. I'm still waiting for some money back from the time I was at V and they cancelled when they spilt. Never pressed it because it meant James were bumped up the running order and got an extra 20 minutes and they did this with some helium balloons.

Would probably see them if they played though just 'cos I love a singalong and that's lacking with the headliners so far this year

Edited by PaulieV
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sod 'em. I'm still waiting for some money back from the time I was at V and they cancelled when they spilt. Never pressed it because it meant James were bumped up the running order and got an extra 20 minutes and they did this with some helium balloons.

Would probably see them if they played though just 'cos I love a singalong and that's lacking with the headliners so far this year

Edited by Dan R
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kasabian and Oasis at the same festival would be hideous, they'd have to expand the festival to fit in all the massive egos and I can hear people chanting their "anthems" now, aaaaaaaahhhhhhh AHHHHHH NOOOooooOOOO, please GOD nOOOOOoooo!!

"AAAANNNDD BAAABBBY, YOU'RE GONNAAAAA BEEEE THEE ONE THAT SAAAAVVVVEEESS MEEEE..."

Horrible, horrible, horrible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just on the "conspiracy theory"

Yes, No doesn't equal Definitely Maybe. At all.

On Oasis, they were way past their best before they split, and it's way to soon for a nostalgia based reformation (I saw the end of their 2009 show at V, awful). I suppose I am perpetuating the hype by even responding in the thread really but suffice to say, please god noasis for Glastonbury.

Metallica or bust!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kasabian and Oasis at the same festival would be hideous, they'd have to expand the festival to fit in all the massive egos and I can hear people chanting their "anthems" now, aaaaaaaahhhhhhh AHHHHHH NOOOooooOOOO, please GOD nOOOOOoooo!!

"AAAANNNDD BAAABBBY, YOU'RE GONNAAAAA BEEEE THEE ONE THAT SAAAAVVVVEEESS MEEEE..."

Horrible, horrible, horrible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That was probably more entertaining. I was at the site they did play and it was possibly the worst headline set I've ever seen. Never seen a less enthused band, wasn't shocked in the slightest that they haven't played together since. Actually felt sad afterwards.

Also, hasn't LG hinted lots that he wants Oasis to reform, but NG was the one who quit and is doing pretty well for himself solo, can't see why he'd want the money or want to re-join.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The same as many comments here; I am a huge Noel Gallagher fan, Oasis 1994-about 2000. Once Bonehead left and Liam's voice went, they became a bit of a parody of themselves.

Most of the songs sound better when Noel sings them (they're almost all his songs anyway) and I can't be bothered with Liam.

I'd much rather Noel and his Birds did an Other Stage set.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd put money on it not happening, but if it did, it wouldn't be the absolute disaster many here are alluding to it being. Let's not forget, in their prime, away from all the hype and twatty behaviour, they're responsible for some pretty great songs and at least two really good, very influential albums. The only thing that would stop me from being genuinely thrilled would be how volatile the whole thing would be. I'd be nervous that they'd not keep it together and Liam would either act like a right dick or Noel would get all precious, as they both tend to do.

Anyway, not happening either way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They'll reform when Noel wants it, and it will be to do with status rather than money, however I wouldn't overestimate the current status of his solo project. It's mainly been a success by rehashing old Oasis demos and doing Oasis covers (at least Beady Eye made a fist of trying to be a different band before reducing themselves to that) and I suspect that he's never going to headline festivals or play massive concerts. When he gets the urge to do that one more time they'll get back together.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...