Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

2025 Headliners


Guest

Recommended Posts

15 hours ago, MEGATRONICMEATWAGON said:

 

Had no idea she pulled out so far down the line for such BS. I mean, she's a single singer, if she can't fit onto that stage for a one off show then her ego is even greater than I thought.

 

 I mean as others have said we will probably not know the complete truth about the breakdown - but it broke in the media late February you would think normally Glastonbury have the headliners locked in way earlier than that - 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, charlierc said:

APE 2022. But if it didn't sell out, it didn't sell out.


I was at that and the rest of the lineup was pants, the sound was terrible, the crowd was sketchy and fortunately I can’t remember a thing of it as I got spiked with suspected GHB (like many others there that day). And it was really expensive. Tame could pull off a glasto headline slot I’m sure. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, nectarofthegods said:

Eminem would be a huge get for the festival. Absolutely one of the biggest hiphop acts there ever has been probably THE biggest, has huge crossover appeal that no other rapper really has. And has a lot of cross generational appeal, gen Z absolutely love him, older people also have more appreciation of him vs basically any other hiphop act, whether thats a good thing or not. 

 

Also he is widely considered one of the most talented rappers by pretty much every other rapper. They’re never going to have Nas on Glastonbury headliner cos he’s just nowhere near big enough so thats a useless argument lol. 
 

Rihanna isn’t on Eminem’s level come on now. She’s big fame wise but talent wise not even close. She’s not creative, she hasn’t transformed a genre. Didn’t write a single word her whole career. You could have swapped in anyone who could hold a tune to sing Umbrella and it wouldn’t make a difference. 
 

If Emily has a shred of wit she would sell her organs to try and secure a Madonna booking no chance her pulling out once would impact things at all

 

I agree, he has more musical credibility, and is superior to Rihana as far as talent goes. But he's just said too much horrible homophobic and sexist sh*t. I wouldn't book anyone like that in this day and age. They're dinosaurs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Spindles said:

Latest tabloid headliner rumour from the Metro, saying Harry Styles:

https://metro.co.uk/2024/09/14/former-one-direction-star-asked-headline-glastonbury-21604991/

could be .... has come from the Scum who were reporting something else a few weeks back .... cant recall what but chucking a name or two out there again and one may at some point be accurate 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Lionator said:


I was at that and the rest of the lineup was pants, the sound was terrible, the crowd was sketchy and fortunately I can’t remember a thing of it as I got spiked with suspected GHB (like many others there that day). And it was really expensive. Tame could pull off a glasto headline slot I’m sure. 

Well that sounds like a thoroughly dreadful afternoon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, WhoOdyssey said:

Billboard reported a few months ago that he’s working on his fourth album, so I wouldn’t be surprised if he’s back performing next year.

I guess next summer will be three years since Harry's House, so maybe new music.  But Love On Tour was a huge undertaking and I dunno if he'll be mounting anything similar after being on the road for 3 years straight.  In the same way I'm not expecting Swizzle to gear up to do anything for 2026.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Harry styles rumour might have some legs, but you would have expected other summer 25 tour dates to be announced already for it to work. 

 

I think it really depends on how ready he is to release his next album and tour. 

 

If the new album came out in late spring then glasto would be part of the massive promotional push then He sells a stadium tour after it maybe he's in Europe and ends up back in the UK in 2026? Dunno, you sort of feel like if he was doing that he'd already be selling Europe 25 tickets. 

 

Also,  lots of the big summer 25 tours have already been announced. 

 

I reckon it will happen one day+ not impossible it'll be next year, name and size works but you would expect a bit more activity in regards to live dates and album release dates. 

He might surprise us. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, WhoOdyssey said:

Billboard reported a few months ago that he’s working on his fourth album, so I wouldn’t be surprised if he’s back performing next year.

 

1 hour ago, CaledonianGonzo said:

I guess next summer will be three years since Harry's House, so maybe new music.  But Love On Tour was a huge undertaking and I dunno if he'll be mounting anything similar after being on the road for 3 years straight.  In the same way I'm not expecting Swizzle to gear up to do anything for 2026.

It could still work tbf if Styles is only doing a couple of shows rather than going all-in on playing gig after gig after gig to a similar scale to the Love on Tour commitments. I don't think it would be that unheard of to just do, say, 5/6 shows to dip a toe back in the water and one being the big slot on El Pointo.

 

Certainly he'll know the demand is there given how many Wembley dates were done in 2022 and 2023.

Edited by charlierc
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Feel like theres a Harry Styles to headline Glastonbury news story by an untrusted news paper most years in recent history.  

I guess if they are going to do it they might aswell do it every year - 

 

https://www.somersetlive.co.uk/news/local-news/glastonbury-festival-2022-harry-styles-6595087

 

https://www.express.co.uk/entertainment/music/1782883/harry-styles-glastonbury-2023-arctic-monkeys-alex-turner-health

 

https://www.somersetcountygazette.co.uk/news/24188870.glastonbury-2024-killers-harry-styles-tipped-secret-sets/

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Ben7amin_ said:

Feel like theres a Harry Styles to headline Glastonbury news story by an untrusted news paper most years in recent history.  

I guess if they are going to do it they might aswell do it every year - 

 

https://www.somersetlive.co.uk/news/local-news/glastonbury-festival-2022-harry-styles-6595087

 

https://www.express.co.uk/entertainment/music/1782883/harry-styles-glastonbury-2023-arctic-monkeys-alex-turner-health

 

https://www.somersetcountygazette.co.uk/news/24188870.glastonbury-2024-killers-harry-styles-tipped-secret-sets/

 

 

They'll get it right at some point .... I reckon he ill do it . Somerset Live can be written as can be written off as some kind of source as they just take from other places and regurgitate and county gazette is a pretty small local newspaper ...id be surprised if they got any exclusives like that ... but fair play if they do 🙂 ... plenty of clickbait 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/14/2024 at 8:39 AM, Suprefan said:


 

yes they do. Madonna doesnt compromise her sh*t. Emily shouldve understood that. She pulled off the whole show outdoors in Brasil back in May. Glasto just didnt want to put the work in to make it happen. I mean Madonna is so batshit she wanted to come down from the ceiling of the stadium when she did the Super Bowl Halftime show. They had to tell her no because she brought it up 2 days before the game during rehearsals. At that point you aint cancelling anything anyway. This year they gave Dua and Coldplay their little mini stage and changed the configuration of the front pit area and such to make it happen. Theyll have to be willing to keep making more changes with productions cause nobody wants to just be on a stage anymore and thats it. Hell, Coldplay does songs in 3 different areas on their solo gigs. 

You’re saying Glastonbury compromised their staging for Coldplay and Dua Lipa but not Madonna? I’m confused. Sorry can’t agree, no sane person pulls out of headlining Glastonbury because of a few minor staging changes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/14/2024 at 8:39 AM, Suprefan said:

yes they do. Madonna doesnt compromise her sh*t. Emily shouldve understood that. She pulled off the whole show outdoors in Brasil back in May. Glasto just didnt want to put the work in to make it happen.

 

They had a week to set that gig up. They'd have 90 minutes to do it at Glasto.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/13/2024 at 11:45 PM, Ben7amin_ said:

I was at an age when Eminem came out it, he was the cool artists to listen to -  and certainly his first two albums were "all the rage".  However I lost interest very quickly on the 3rd album onwards - not a fan of that stuff - and now looking back ive kind of not got the same love i had for the first two albums that i first had. 


Did you misspeak and meant to say the fourth album, or do you actually think The Eminem Show (not even counting Infinite) was bad?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/14/2024 at 4:43 AM, CaledonianGonzo said:

Very little chance of Emily reaching out to Madonna again after Madge drive up to the farm and started doing donuts on the front lawn whilst flicking the Vs.

I dunno. Get the feeling Madonna is a “boil” that Emily wants to “lance”. Last great 80s/90s living superstar never to have played.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Of course - just that this year genuinely felt like the best opportunity for it to happen, what with the Greatest Hits tour and so on. Never say never, but 2024 really seemed like it was our window and I'm betting it wasn't cos the festival didn't do their utmost to seal the deal.

 

That said, I assume that the G weren't alone in trying to reel her in, and I seem to recall a rumour that BST were after her as well which obviously didn't pan out. One Copacabana concert doesn't prove much one way or another.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...