Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Headliners 2023


Crazyfool01

Recommended Posts

Just now, Florian Saucer Attack said:

LOL. It's a perfect balance by the end of the evening you will come away thinking exactly the same way about yourself as you did at the start of the evening

It's my Glastonbury in a nutshell.

First 10 minutes "Oo look, a juggler. That's nice".

Last day " Oo look, another fucking juggler. YOU c**t!"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Ayrshire Chris said:

Melissa Reese the guns n roses keyboard player was touted years ago as the next Taylor Swift, and has worked with her in the past. 
not a lotta folk know that. 😉

So you are saying without a doubt that Swift will come on during the GNR set to sing a couple of songs. What a moment that will be

I hope they do civil war and Shake it off

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Hugh Jass II said:

I am not. These are truly the kings of chocolate biscuits…

image.jpeg.b0032dffa36a7f4b6d2b5bf0954d32ad.jpeg

Surely if advertised as more chocolate than biscuit, they count as the former for the purpose of this debate?

If they are biscuit qualifiers, then still wrong, because, Echo above.

(These are some very nice biscuits though.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Martin Ashford said:

I'm pretty sure Neil trusts me. In the same way that I feel a burning resentment that a band I don't care for at all (Arctic Monkeys) are likely to have a Pyramid headline slot for the third time, it must seem quite offensive that a band he clearly doesn't like is having the peak headline slot at the best festival on Earth. A lot of people felt like that about Jay Z in 2008 (turns out he was brilliant). I feel a bit like that about Harry Styles even though I admit I am ideologically opposed to "someone like him" having a Pyramid slot in the first place and the fact that he probably had sex with Taylor Swift countless times (the bastard) but thereby inspiring most of the magnificent 1989 with lines like "he's so tall and handsome as hell". Do I sound jealous? I'm not a big fan of Guns N Roses myself but they are a huge "heritage"  rock act with a massive crossover appeal thanks mainly to Sweet Child Of Mine which is so obiquitous that it's almost laughable these days.

These are fair points, but the difference between Jay-Z headlining and GnR is pretty night and day I'd say. Jay-Z was the very first hip-hop act to headline, and was there based off a run of 10-15 years producing critically and commerically successful albums - people were against it because it was different. People are against GnR because thery're awful live and completely irrelevant.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Florian Saucer Attack said:

Can we please move the biscuit talk to another thread?

Maybe set up a biscuit world cup or something

What, you want this to go back to the way it was?

Think of this as the Christmas 1914 football match. Irrelevant to what was actually happening at the time but a pleasant distraction for all involved.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, JayDiesel said:

These are fair points, but the difference between Jay-Z headlining and GnR is pretty night and day I'd say. Jay-Z was the very first hip-hop act to headline, and was there based off a run of 10-15 years producing critically and commerically successful albums - people were against it because it was different. People are against GnR because thery're awful live and completely irrelevant.

Booking Jay-Z was one of the best decisions GFL has ever made (well done Emily). A lot of the fuss made was due to that idiot with his "hip hop at Glastonbury no way" rant, while spectacularly failing to know that there had been plenty previously, although not headlining The Pyramid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, NorthernSoul52 said:

Alright, alright, back to headliners then.

Given this is headliners for 2023 at a broad canter, any stabs in the dark for Park toppers this year?

I don't know if they're big enough but I'd love it to be Le Tigre. Siouxsie or Sparks would be cool, but again not sure on size.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Martin Ashford said:

I'm pretty sure Neil trusts me. In the same way that I feel a burning resentment that a band I don't care for at all (Arctic Monkeys) are likely to have a Pyramid headline slot for the third time, it must seem quite offensive that a band he clearly doesn't like is having the peak headline slot at the best festival on Earth. A lot of people felt like that about Jay Z in 2008 (turns out he was brilliant). I feel a bit like that about Harry Styles even though I admit I am ideologically opposed to "someone like him" having a Pyramid slot in the first place and the fact that he probably had sex with Taylor Swift countless times (the bastard) but thereby inspiring most of the magnificent 1989 with lines like "he's so tall and handsome as hell". Do I sound jealous? I'm not a big fan of Guns N Roses myself but they are a huge "heritage"  rock act with a massive crossover appeal thanks mainly to Sweet Child Of Mine which is so obiquitous that it's almost laughable these days.

A response to a post from 4th November. 

That fits in perfectly with the same conversation on this thread today.

Brilliant.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Quark said:

What, you want this to go back to the way it was?

Think of this as the Christmas 1914 football match. Irrelevant to what was actually happening at the time but a pleasant distraction for all involved.

No I never want to talk about that person again but surely something as important as biscuits deserves it's own thread!

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm sure there will be a more than acceptable act on one of the the stages, im kinda hoping maybe The Prodigy are on the Other that night. 

Maybe little Nas X on west holts. 

I don't even mind GnR either just think they are passed it, Appetite is a banging album but they fell of a cliff right after, one of the few banks to peak on their debut. 

If there is absolutely nothing else on I will probably go see them. 

Edited by Xeph1995
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...